Generational Dynamics World View News

[Tom Mazanec]

Pity those thousands of readers don’t buy your books.
I did.

[shoshin]

AS your editir, I feel compelled to point out that you are overusing the word "sleaze."

[John]

** 26-Sep-2019 Sleaziness

> AS your editor, I feel compelled to point out that you are
> overusing the word "sleaze."

The number of uses or occurrences of the word "sleaze" or a derivative
of the word "sleaze" is proportional to the sleaziness of whatever
sleazy person or object is being described.

P.S.: As I type this, I'm watching the sleazy Adam Schiff on tv lie
again.

[mps92]

John, if you can, I hope you stick around at least until the 2020 election just to see Trump win again. Maybe then you'll be able to go in peace, at least knowing that our govt will be run by someone competent for the next four years.

I already can't wait for the election even though it's more than a year away. My university is super liberal - everyone's gonna lose their minds. The tears streaming down the faces of all the young women and the effeminate young men... it'll be a sight to behold.

It looks like it's going to be Trump vs Warren. Joe's support is steadily eroding, while Warren is steadily gaining. The betting markets have Warren at over a 40% chance to win the nomination.

I think a lot of Republicans are hoping that the Democrats go as far left as possible, because that means it'll be easier for Republicans to win in the short-term. But the problem is, since the Democrats control the media, and the educational institutions, and Hollywood, and Silicon Valley, as they keep moving to the left their entourage will follow. This is precisely what is happening now. According to polls, somewhere between 35%-40% of people in the US support open borders. A similar number of Americans believe college should be free. Obviously that's not a majority, but that number is still unbelievably high. Not even 5 years ago was that number so high.

And it's because the Democrats know that they can go as far left as they want - the media, the schools, and the celebrities will all follow in lockstep.

[John]

27-Sep-19 World View -- The fraud of France's Jacques Chirac in the Iraq war


Jacques Chirac and Saddam Hussein's Oil-for-Food scam


** 27-Sep-19 World View -- The fraud of France's Jacques Chirac in the Iraq war
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e190927


Contents:
The fraud of France's Jacques Chirac in the Iraq war
Jacques Chirac and Saddam Hussein's Oil-for-Food scam


Keys:
Generational Dynamics, France, Jacques Chirac,
Iraq, Saddam Hussein, Oil-For-Food, Russia

[John]

> John, if you can, I hope you stick around at least until the 2020
> election just to see Trump win again.

It's not up to me. It depends on when I run out of money.

[JCP]

Joe Biden at the Council on Foreign Relations:

"So I said to Poroshenko (Ukrainian President) & Yatsenuk (Ukr PM): If you don't fire the prosecutor investigating my son, we're going to withhold the $1 billion in aid."

https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/stat ... 3569538048

Watch the video...

[JCP]

BREAKING: A large cache of confidential foreign documents have just been leaked implicating Joe Biden, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Joseph Misfud's collusion and possible criminal activity in Ukraine.

Download and start digging!
https://www.scribd.com/user/259237201/JohnSolomon …

[John]

** 27-Sep-2019 World View: Climate science

> John, you may have a strong foreign policy background, but your
> knowledge of basic science is almost zero. Apparently, Greta is
> far more versed than you, so simple insults seem more than a
> little foolish, if you ask me.

> If we stop adding more CO2 to the atmosphere starting today, the
> temperature will continue to rise for the next two
> centuries. That's the effect of hysteresis. So yes, she has every
> right to be pissed-off, and not because someone told her to
> be. The last time the levels got this high, the temperature was
> about 3.6-5.4 degrees warmer and the seas 50-80 feet
> higher. Preventing that involves decades of CO2 extraction. Adding
> more just makes the task more daunting.

> When virtually everyone in the know agrees with her, maybe you
> need to reconsider your POV.

So here are some things that I know:

• Anyone whose strongest argument is that 14 year old teenage girl
  aspiring actress knows more about science than I do is completely full
  of crap and knows that he's completely full of crap. Furthermore, if
  you ever watched anything but the crazy nutcases on CNN and MSNBC,
  you would know that there are a lot of people "in the know" who don't
  agree with the teenage girl.
• Anyone who denies the climate change religion is shunned by the
  mainstream media, or is called a racist or misogynist or white
  supremist.
• There are many scientists and web sites that deny the climate
  change religion. Here's one that presents plenty of evidence that
  climate change claims are wrong:
  
  (https://realclimatescience.com/)
  
  I particularly like the article entitled "Another Wildly Fraudulent
  Data Set From NOAA":
  
  (https://realclimatescience.com/2019/09/another-wildly-fraudulent-data-set-from-noaa/)
• Even if you assume that climate scientists have always been
  correct about the past, it turns out they've almost always been
  wrong about predicting the future. Here are a couple of sites
  to look at:
  
  (https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions)
  
  (http://www.aei.org/publication/18-spectacularly-wrong-predictions-made-around-the-time-of-first-earth-day-in-1970-expect-more-this-year-3/)
  
  These are subjects that MUST NOT be uttered. It's forbidden to
  mention these things in the mainstream media, and it may even be
  punishable by death by people from the loony left.
• Climate scientists assume a static, unchanging world, with one and
  only one thing changing in the next century, carbon emissions.
  Climate scientists run scared when you talk about a dynamic world.
• Particular issue that makes climate scientists run scared: The
  certainty of one or two world wars in this century, plus massive
  regional nuclear and ground wars, killing hundreds of millions or
  billions of people when combined with disease, famine and suicide.
  The population reduction will substantially reduce carbon emissions.
• Another issue that makes climate scientists run scared: The
  Singularity, nanotechnology, biotechnology, and other technological
  advances that drive so-called scientists crazy.
• Another issue that makes climate scientists run scared: Showing
  how their predictions have been consistently disastrously wrong, which
  means that it's the climate activists are the true "climate
  deniers."

And so, I do believe that I know more about science that the 14 year
old teenage girl aspiring actress. However, I doubt very much that
you do.

[John]

** 27-Sep-2019 World View: Get ready to burn

> John -- Without replying line-by-line, let's agree that your
> sources and mine are very different. Your climate sources are, to
> be frank, a bunch of hacks funded by the fossil fuel industry
> (yes, I did my research). It's impossible to respond to their
> nonsense, because it's a lot easier to create than rebut -- a
> feature Trump uses every day and every way. Your argument that we
> shouldn't listen to a 16 (not 14) year old has more merit. I
> would never cite her as an expert source or even a spokesperson
> for an expert source. She's an activist, who happens to be more
> right than wrong. Her role, like that of any activist, is to
> rabble-rouse. That she's' doing extremely well. Since using logic
> and empirical data haven't worked, maybe a little emotion and a
> touching narrative might be in order.

So your sources are phony left-wing ideological hacks who present
evidence selectively and make phony, delusional predictions of a
dystopian future in order get funding for their governments or
themselves. And like every other activist, you completely ignored the
two points about war and technology, both of which destroy the climate
activists' arguments.

This whole thing is a joke and a hoax anyway. Nobody is reducing
carbon emissions except the United States, and China is aggressively
pursuing new coal-fired power plants. Even if everything you say were
right, it would make no difference in carbon emissions. So if you
really believe all the crap that you're referencing, then just lean
back and enjoy your last 11 years on earth, because nothing is going
to stop you from turning into a charred piece of flesh.