Generational Dynamics World View News

Discussion of Web Log and Analysis topics from the Generational Dynamics web site.
FishbellykanakaDude
Posts: 1313
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:07 pm

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by FishbellykanakaDude »

John wrote:** 21-May-2019 Making war illegal

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

...Republican SenatorHiram Johnson of California, "War may be banished from the earth more nearly by disarmament than by any other agency or in any other manner."...

As a footnote to all this, in 1929 the US led the world in signing the Kellogg-Briand Pact, which outlawed war and made war illegal. Frank Kellogg earned the Nobel Peace Prize in 1929 for his work on the Peace Pact.

Feel free to supply your own jokes.
"Outlaw war",.. why not? Well, idiot, because there are no "laws" in the international domain. There are only marketing pamphlets.

"Peace Through Kill-Me-Please!" -- a wonderful slogan, don'tcha think!?

CH86
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:51 am

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by CH86 »

You globalists have sought since the days of President Wilson to "de-asianize" Asia. Same with policy toward Japan back then. According to your own theory there was no danger to allowing Japan to surrender without an occupation in 1945 as Japan would have been forced to ally with us anyway after the CCP unified China in 1949.

John
Posts: 11479
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by John »

** 21-May-2019 Foreseeing the future

CH86 wrote: > You globalists have sought since the days of President Wilson to
> "de-asianize" Asia. Same with policy toward Japan back
> then. According to your own theory there was no danger to allowing
> Japan to surrender without an occupation in 1945 as Japan would
> have been forced to ally with us anyway after the CCP unified
> China in 1949.
As usual, you've written total gibberish, but I do have one question.
How did we know in 1945 that the CCP would unify China in 1949?

CH86
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:51 am

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by CH86 »

John wrote:** 21-May-2019 Foreseeing the future

CH86 wrote: > You globalists have sought since the days of President Wilson to
> "de-asianize" Asia. Same with policy toward Japan back
> then. According to your own theory there was no danger to allowing
> Japan to surrender without an occupation in 1945 as Japan would
> have been forced to ally with us anyway after the CCP unified
> China in 1949.
As usual, you've written total gibberish, but I do have one question.
How did we know in 1945 that the CCP would unify China in 1949?
Again the globalist obsession with regime change becomes obvious. By 1945 the CCP was stronger than the KMT, and controlled numerous base areas behind the Japanese Lines; the Chinese factions increasingly ignored the Japanese because it was increasingly obvious that the Japanese would be gone but the civil war still hadn't been resolved Yet. Japan wouldn't have been able to have good relations with any Chinese government for obvious reason, I don't need to explain it because a picture says a thousand words.

https://external-preview.redd.it/H8r8Bw ... 27f3f1b84c

John
Posts: 11479
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by John »

** 21-May-2019 Rape of Nanking

CH86 wrote: > Again the globalist obsession with regime change becomes
> obvious. By 1945 the CCP was stronger than the KMT, and controlled
> numerous base areas behind the Japanese Lines; the Chinese
> factions increasingly ignored the Japanese because it was
> increasingly obvious that the Japanese would be gone but the civil
> war still hadn't been resolved Yet. Japan wouldn't have been able
> to have good relations with any Chinese government for obvious
> reason, I don't need to explain it because a picture says a
> thousand words.

> https://external-preview.redd.it/H8r8Bw ... 27f3f1b84c
Nice try, but that picture is allegedly from the Rape of Nanking 1937.
It has nothing to do with the unification of China. You have no clue
what you're talking about.

Image

CH86
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:51 am

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by CH86 »

John wrote:** 21-May-2019 Rape of Nanking

CH86 wrote: > Again the globalist obsession with regime change becomes
> obvious. By 1945 the CCP was stronger than the KMT, and controlled
> numerous base areas behind the Japanese Lines; the Chinese
> factions increasingly ignored the Japanese because it was
> increasingly obvious that the Japanese would be gone but the civil
> war still hadn't been resolved Yet. Japan wouldn't have been able
> to have good relations with any Chinese government for obvious
> reason, I don't need to explain it because a picture says a
> thousand words.

> https://external-preview.redd.it/H8r8Bw ... 27f3f1b84c
Nice try, but that picture is allegedly from the Rape of Nanking 1937.
It has nothing to do with the unification of China. You have no clue
what you're talking about.

Image
I'm Astonished that you've been so dense to have missed the entire point of my paragraph. The point is that a Japanese-Soviet or Japanese-CCP alliance was impossible and would have been impossible post-1945. I used that particular picture to symbolize what went down between Chinese and Japanese during the war. For that reason there was no danger of allowing Japan to surrender without an occupation because japan would not be a threat to the US from the moment the shooting in the war had stopped. Japan would have had no choice other to be a US ally and this conundrum would have existed without unconditional surrender or with it, it would have made no real difference in the context of the postwar world.

FishbellykanakaDude
Posts: 1313
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:07 pm

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by FishbellykanakaDude »

CH86 wrote:...

I'm Astonished that...
So,.. DID you tend to play "Lawful/Evil" or "Lawful/Amoral" characters in D&D (or AD&D) back in the day, or what? Just gotta keep going for an answer to this question cuz it's really interesting.

..you're just so incredibly "lawful", 'though your "good-evil" dimensional position seems altogether mysterious.

John
Posts: 11479
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:10 pm
Location: Cambridge, MA USA
Contact:

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by John »

** 21-May-2019 Japan-CCP Alliance
CH86 wrote: > I'm Astonished that you've been so dense to have missed the entire
> point of my paragraph. The point is that a Japanese-Soviet or
> Japanese-CCP alliance was impossible and would have been
> impossible post-1945. I used that particular picture to symbolize
> what went down between Chinese and Japanese during the war. For
> that reason there was no danger of allowing Japan to surrender
> without an occupation because japan would not be a threat to the
> US from the moment the shooting in the war had stopped. Japan
> would have had no choice other to be a US ally and this conundrum
> would have existed without unconditional surrender or with it, it
> would have made no real difference in the context of the postwar
> world.

This is still complete gibberish in multiple ways:
  • A Japanese CCP alliance was never a possibility because of any
    number of humiliations that Japan inflicted on the Chinese in the
    previous 50 years: the First Sino-Japanese war (1894-95), Twenty-One
    Demands (May 9, 1915 - China's National Humiliation Day), Versailles
    Betrayal (1919), the Mukden incident (1931) and invasion of
    Manchuria, to name a few.
  • So that silly picture is completely irrelevant.
  • The Americans DID occupy Japan after the war. US General Douglas
    MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of Allied Powers, led the occupation
    of Japan by American forces, and enacted widespread military,
    political, economic, and social reforms.
  • Beyond that, what you've written is completely incoherent.
Sorry to have "Astonished" you. I hope you recover. Or not.

User avatar
Tom Mazanec
Posts: 4180
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:13 pm

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by Tom Mazanec »

Weather all over the world is threatening a global food crisis:
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archiv ... -be-coming
This is likely a result of global warming...if you put more energy into a chaotic system like the atmosphere it goes bonkers. Global Warming is a crisi right now, not in 2100 or something.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, Those Who Remain

CH86
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:51 am

Re: Generational Dynamics World View News

Post by CH86 »

John wrote:** 21-May-2019 Japan-CCP Alliance
CH86 wrote: > I'm Astonished that you've been so dense to have missed the entire
> point of my paragraph. The point is that a Japanese-Soviet or
> Japanese-CCP alliance was impossible and would have been
> impossible post-1945. I used that particular picture to symbolize
> what went down between Chinese and Japanese during the war. For
> that reason there was no danger of allowing Japan to surrender
> without an occupation because japan would not be a threat to the
> US from the moment the shooting in the war had stopped. Japan
> would have had no choice other to be a US ally and this conundrum
> would have existed without unconditional surrender or with it, it
> would have made no real difference in the context of the postwar
> world.

This is still complete gibberish in multiple ways:
  • A Japanese CCP alliance was never a possibility because of any
    number of humiliations that Japan inflicted on the Chinese in the
    previous 50 years: the First Sino-Japanese war (1894-95), Twenty-One
    Demands (May 9, 1915 - China's National Humiliation Day), Versailles
    Betrayal (1919), the Mukden incident (1931) and invasion of
    Manchuria, to name a few.
  • So that silly picture is completely irrelevant.
  • The Americans DID occupy Japan after the war. US General Douglas
    MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of Allied Powers, led the occupation
    of Japan by American forces, and enacted widespread military,
    political, economic, and social reforms.
  • Beyond that, what you've written is completely incoherent.
Sorry to have "Astonished" you. I hope you recover. Or not.
The reforms were unnecessary and irrelevant to winning the war, the whole point of war is to get the enemy to sue for peace/surrender Not reforming the enemy nation's culture. This is something Wilsonians and globalists simply don't understand. The Occupation was therefore unnecessary.

Globalist ideologues have consistently refused to respect the law or international law, particularly during cases whenever there is a "Jews in Nazi Germany" situation. Or whenever there was a major war or regional war. Silents and Interventionist boomers (those boomers who never accepted the boomer awakening) never take into account how such policies and intervention poisons America's relations with the authorities of those countries from which the refugees generally are fleeing from. The Postwar generations (awakened boomers during the 2T and everyone after them) care deeply about respecting the law and other countries rights, as well as demanding proper representation within the law rather than allowing their rights and prerogatives to be usurped by "refugees" and "hypothetical jews" (a term for various groups of political and ethnic refugees, Not actual ww2-era jews).

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests