6-Apr-17 World View -- President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians

[John]

6-Apr-17 World View -- President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians

John McCain and Lindsey Graham advocate cruise missiles and safe areas

** 6-Apr-17 World View -- President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e170406


Contents:
President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians
President Trump declares that he's changed his mind about military action
Marco Rubio says Trump's policy emboldened Bashar al-Assad
John McCain and Lindsey Graham advocate cruise missiles and safe areas


Keys:
Generational Dynamics, Donald Trump, Nikki Haley, Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
Russia, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Rex Tillerson,
John McCain, Lindsey Graham

[zzazz]

Why would Bashar Al-Assad want to help Trump? Oh wait, they are both Putin allies. And Trump has been nothing but a buffoon so far--he needs a distraction in the worst way! Maybe this is what that Eric Prince back channel was setting up?

[DaKardii]

6-Apr-17 World View -- President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians

John McCain and Lindsey Graham advocate cruise missiles and safe areas

** 6-Apr-17 World View -- President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians
** http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ ... tm#e170406


Contents:
President Trump plans military action on Syria after horrific nerve gas attack on civilians
President Trump declares that he's changed his mind about military action
Marco Rubio says Trump's policy emboldened Bashar al-Assad
John McCain and Lindsey Graham advocate cruise missiles and safe areas


Keys:
Generational Dynamics, Donald Trump, Nikki Haley, Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
Russia, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Rex Tillerson,
John McCain, Lindsey Graham

If Generational Dynamics is true, a war between the US and Syria will be very short and inconclusive, if it happens at all. Assad is a Shiite and an Iranian/Russian ally, and therefore will be an American ally in the Clash of Civilizations war.

[John]

> If Generational Dynamics is true, a war between the US and Syria
> will be very short and inconclusive, if it happens at all. Assad
> is a Shiite and an Iranian/Russian ally, and therefore will be an
> American ally in the Clash of Civilizations war.

Well, it's a little more nuanced than that. There's a historic fault
line in Syria between the Shia Alawites and the Sunni Arabs and
Turkmens. So in the regional Sunni vs Shia clash, one side will be
our allies and the other not. By that time, Al-Assad himself may be
dead, for all anyone knows.

[Trevor]

I'll believe it when I see it. I've been hearing for years that a strike on Syria is imminent, that we'll be starting a major war, that we'll be blowing up Assad's air force, try to force him out, end up causing more chaos (guess the half a million dead doesn't count) etc. If we haven't done it by now, I doubt we're going to. It's little more than empty words at this point.

If the World War alignment really is what Generational Dynamics predicts, if we do anything, we'll end up supporting Assad. It's essentially what we've been doing for the past couple years anyway, even if unofficially.

[Trevor]

Ok, looks like I was wrong...

[John]

Yeah, you said you'd believe it when you see it, so just turn on the tv.

[FishbellykanakaDude]

I'll believe it when I see it. I've been hearing for years that a strike on Syria is imminent, that we'll be starting a major war, that we'll be blowing up Assad's air force, try to force him out, end up causing more chaos (guess the half a million dead doesn't count) etc. If we haven't done it by now, I doubt we're going to. It's little more than empty words at this point.

If the World War alignment really is what Generational Dynamics predicts, if we do anything, we'll end up supporting Assad. It's essentially what we've been doing for the past couple years anyway, even if unofficially.

(This is composed AFTER the US attack on the one Syrian airbase.)

The Russians will "kick in" with the US to "save Syria for the Syrians" FROM Assad.

Their goal is not to keep Assad,.. it's to acquire air/naval military bases. They now have an excuse to "protect" Syria by occupying bases there, as well as to grab inland bits of land (for bases) in their "extermination" of ISIS.

The "long implied" threat from the US, directed at Russia, is that if you can attack the Ukraine and only receive "US/EU economic sanctions" we (the US) will be willing to take "Russian economic sanctions" (whatever the HELL that means) if we choose to "move on" some target that will "advantage" us at some point.

US sanctions minus (-) Russian sanctions equals (=) end of Syria-under-Assad plus (+) Russian Military Bases plus (+) Russia/US quasi-alliance-against-ISIS(et al) plus (+) Scared Iranians willing to "make a deal" plus (+) Nervous NKorean Generals in the mood to not-die following the orders of an insane snowflake named Un.

..plus (+) China not wanting to lose the "advantage" (in the [game of] Go sense) by losing NKorea plus (+) China's bluff potentially being called in the South China Sea because they're not ready to deal with the US asserting international sea rights.