Climate Change

at99sy
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:22 am

Re: Climate Change

Post by at99sy »

The United States is clearly to blame for increased solar impacts upon the Earth. There can be no other explanation and Americans must
enact sweeping legislation and tax incentives to correct this systematic attack on the less fortunate society's. A 70% reduction in energy usage, aggressive taxation on all consumables combined with compassionate re-education programs to teach greedy Americans how to live a lower impact life style will
improve the global community and build bridges to a system of equality for the future of our children.

gerald
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by gerald »

at99sy wrote:The United States is clearly to blame for increased solar impacts upon the Earth. There can be no other explanation and Americans must
enact sweeping legislation and tax incentives to correct this systematic attack on the less fortunate society's. A 70% reduction in energy usage, aggressive taxation on all consumables combined with compassionate re-education programs to teach greedy Americans how to live a lower impact life style will
improve the global community and build bridges to a system of equality for the future of our children.
Logical --
However, there are numerous indications that this problem could be solved if "suppressed" knowledge was released, but of course TPTB would not approve.

We must move forward - not backward.

“How can we get money from the electricity which Tesla is supplying to every part of the world.” J.P. Morgan. ---- Morgan purposefully scuttled any future ways Tesla could raise money. http://thegoodword.me/free-energy-destr ... e-it-back/

psCargile
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by psCargile »

Logical?

The quoted statement makes the absurd claim that the US is controlling the output of the sun!

gerald
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by gerald »

psCargile wrote:Logical?

The quoted statement makes the absurd claim that the US is controlling the output of the sun!
as in "policitally " logical - sorry

at99sy
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:22 am

Re: Climate Change

Post by at99sy »

psCargile wrote:Logical?

The quoted statement makes the absurd claim that the US is controlling the output of the sun!

Cargile- the absurdity was intentional. To point out the obvious reactions of the USA haters. Anyone who has ever traveled to Chile, Brazil or China would recognize that the air and water quality in North America is pristine in comparison. The blame game has nothing to do with a cleaner environment but to take wealth from the USA and send it elsewhere.

gerald
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by gerald »

Oh -- this is nice --NOT --

According to the media activists or money grabbers and power mongers Golbal warming is apparently the only major important golbal contaminate ,- However as an example --- due to Fukushima -

http://readersupportednews.org/news-sec ... -radiation

"Some cesium was found in 16 of these 22 species in November, the last full month for which data were available.

Cesium was especially prevalent in certain of the species:

• 73 per cent of mackerel tested

• 91 per cent of the halibut

• 92 per cent of the sardines

• 93 per cent of the tuna and eel

• 94 per cent of the cod and anchovies

• 100 per cent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish

Some of the fish were caught in Japanese coastal waters. Other catches were made hundreds of kilometres away in the open ocean.

There, the fish also can be caught by fishers from dozens of other nations who fish in the waters of the Pacific."

----- Nothing to see here, But lets talk about restricting CO2 --- a plant food.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-plant-food.htm

CO2 is plant food

Earth's current atmospheric CO2 concentration is almost 390 parts per million (ppm). Adding another 300 ppm of CO2 to the air has been shown by literally thousands of experiments to greatly increase the growth or biomass production of nearly all plants. This growth stimulation occurs because CO2 is one of the two raw materials (the other being water) that are required for photosynthesis. Hence, CO2 is actually the "food" that sustains essentially all plants on the face of the earth, as well as those in the sea. And the more CO2 they "eat" (absorb from the air or water), the bigger and better they grow. (source: Plants Need CO2)

gerald
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by gerald »

As per John's current China post, a REAL BIG ISSUE is potable water. But that issue a little harder to scam.

gerald
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by gerald »

Is the Earth's weather and climate influenced by the sun's solar electric circuit, it appears to be.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/daily-tpod/

Apr 08, 2013

"External electric flux influences Earth’s climate"

"It was in September of 2006 that a major premise of Electric Universe theory was confirmed: Earth weather is electrically connected to the ionosphere. Since electricity always flows in a circuit, if the ionosphere connects to Earth’s magnetosphere then it connects to the circuits of the Solar System, as well.

The ionosphere is connected to the Sun by twisting filaments of electric current, so the lower levels of the atmosphere must also experience the Sun’s influence because of the additional circuit node that connects them with the ionosphere. Could these electric circuits linking the atmosphere with the Sun have anything to do with Earth’s climate in either the short or long term?"

gerald
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by gerald »

Co2 ( a plant food ) is not the problem , --- pollution is ---

A Map of China’s Cancer Villages

http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2009/05/a- ... -villages/

gerald
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:34 pm

Re: Climate Change

Post by gerald »

interesting post from http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/20 ... euro-swine

nmewn

Completely OT but hilarious. Todays Earth Day, a look back at predictions from Earth Day...1970.

“We have about five more years at the outside to do something.”
• Kenneth Watt, ecologist

“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
• George Wald, Harvard Biologist

“We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.”
• Barry Commoner, Washington University biologist

“Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”
• New York Times editorial, the day after the first Earth Day

My two personal favorites from that rabid eco-idiot who has been wrong his entire tenured life...Paul Ehrlich...

“Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist

“By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist

“It is already too late to avoid mass starvation.”
• Denis Hayes, chief organizer for Earth Day

“Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”
• Peter Gunter, professor, North Texas State University



“Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
• Life Magazine, January 1970

“At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”
• Kenneth Watt, Ecologist



“Air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.”
• Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist...



“We are prospecting for the very last of our resources and using up the nonrenewable things many times faster than we are finding new ones.”
• Martin Litton, Sierra Club director

“By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’”
• Kenneth Watt, Ecologist

“Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
• Sen. Gaylord Nelson

“The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”
• Kenneth Watt, Ecologist
------------------------------------------------

And WE are suppose to believe "experts? Really?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests