While many relegate the PC debate to the so-called culture wars, it is clear that what lies at the bottom of it, is the plain old struggle for power.
Those in power strive to impose a particular narrative, a particular way of looking at things that keeps rulers feeling useful and noble, and the ruled ones either hopeful and grateful, or hateful and paranoid, which in both cases distracts them from the comprehensive analysis of their exploitation and abuse. Political correctness, however, does not present itself as an enforced censorship on behalf of the powerful. And herein lies its ingenuity. Since imposing the limits on conversation is clearly a manifestation of power, nobody should doubt that PC is the instrument that the ruling class uses to protect itself only.
The Democrats have become a cultural marxist flesh pit of political pagan correctness now for decades, and one reason they hate Russians it was offered that Russians are not politically correct. From his Twitter feed, his that is not mine, he is getting the feeling that many Republicans are starting to get the impression that they have more in common with Russians than they do with PC Democrats. Russians and Americans share a common Western culture, whereas liberals and Democrats have rejected that culture, with a level of hatred I have not seen since the 1960s.
They will
filter and corrupt any discourse and have since you are already a racists just breathing as a Constitutional Republican as an Independent of free air just as the Russ swam over the river to Vote with no identification anyways. Attempting to critique an argument by questioning the motives of the author is bad practice we are warned clearly, and is specifically known as deconstruction. Science points to the obvious every time, in time all the time as they worship it also so no one will gain traction with the fact of data fragility. As the meme was forwarded when they see a left in and the right foot out the deists cannot fathom any focus and they are correct to a defined point up to a point such as the synoptic books indicate the formation of that point to the one for the age of grace as we are in of the masters discourse to warn us to stay awake. Dietrich was also correct on the actual cost of cheap faith as the warning of running on the damn train in the first place.
Many Republicans got very alienated from Obama's constant talk of "that is not who we are", as if believing that America has a specific culture and traditions makes you a racist and a fascist a few contend. The other arrow in the Marxist quiver is heterozygoisty that only accounted for one percent of the variation in developmental stability assessed via how symmetrical the individuals were directed to a defined narrative anyways.
The missing point also is they are not Democrats as Mr. Truman pointed out long ago with cogent facts the actual direction seen and needed he conveyed.
Anyways,
thread: Those key words we noted, and they did not.
If you listened to the concession speech one thing was clearly not stated and what was.
Let me add "Clinton" : Our constitutional democracy demands our participation, not just every four years, but all the time. So let’s do all we can to keep advancing the causes and values we all hold dear. Making our economy work for everyone, not just those at the top, protecting our country and protecting our planet.
Sun Nov 20, 2016 8:29 am: No it is your constitutional democracy and our Constitutional Republic. If the yazidi or kurds need help the office can decide that since we hired common sense did we not?
And that is why you need to send that dead party to the body farm to fathom our work is just starting. You simple minded educated debt serfed assholes can
pay for your own procedures we find ghastly.
Although National Right to Life had existed since 1968 in affiliation with the Catholic Church, the 1973 meeting made it an independent organization. It quickly founded affiliates in every state in the country.
Over the next decade, the anti-choice movement began to draw in evangelical Protestants, who until that point had largely been uninterested in the issue or in favor of at least limited abortion rights. In 1976, the Republican Party added an anti-abortion plank to its platform in what was seen by many at the time as — in the words of historian Daniel K. Williams — a “temporary political ploy” to win over Catholic Democrats; by 1980 Ronald Reagan had fully embraced “pro-life” rhetoric and influential evangelicals...
We understand the issues and since you contend why did you not say something then you are past the resolve of civil discourse as was the case then also.
As a moderate we know trends
https://ibankcoin.com/zeropointnow/file ... ecuted.jpg
https://off-guardian.org/2016/12/26/fro ... rrectness/ even this view cannot link what is linking back together again. Walid sees it also developing again.