EBIT will prevail. Nothing else matter's.
Net working capital as a percent of total assets
is the seed money to projects underway. CFO's
are under intense pressure to get the sheet in order
in peer review to even get a contract to customer's
order's. Last edited by aedens on Mon Apr 13, 2009
http://www.zerohedge.com/node/11791 David Rosenberg, former chief economist for Merrill Lynch, one of the few mainstream analysts who got it right (now with Gluskin Sheff in Toronto)
"One can only admire the dexterity with which the oil companies - who stand to make $trillions from carbon fixing, carbon trading and carbon taxes - have positioned themselves both as the 'enemy' to be paraded against by 'green' campaigns while at the same time arranging themselves to be the principle beneficiaries of the most extreme climate change hype which is used to prepare for massive mad carbon fixing schemes and energy price hikes from which
http://author.heritage.org/Press/ALACha ... 663=312158
they would profit and increase asset values." Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:25 pm
http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/v ... ebit#p2927
Earnings will match reality quicker then they want to in Washington. When they pick winners and losers the taxpayer never wins as you see again. Although the Obama administration's blueprint euphemistically refers to this money as 'climate revenue,' in reality it is an energy tax that would force consumers to pay higher energy prices," Lieberman writes in a paper co-authored with research assistant Nicolas Loris. "The plan may be intended to reduce greenhouse gases, but actually it would kill jobs and devastate the economy." I will not fight the tape "will not have to"and GD covers this area reasonably well. The fed feels they can lead the economy to change which is delusional on there part since when have they created wealth? Given OPEC is a monopoly if tried in the context of Law it would be price fixing and the United States created this if you survey accurate history "Golden Gimmick Truman". Understand Middle Eastern Business margins "ethics" to infidels
Blue Dogs are little more than bought-and-paid-for agents of big business. One corporate lobbyist explained the Blue Dogs' fundraising prowess this way: companies say to themselves, "Blue Dog Democrats are probably going to be more business-friendly, so let's give them more campaign contributions.... You get elected, you join the Blue Dogs...the money comes flowing." Individual fundraising is then amplified by contributions from the Blue Dog PAC, much of it from large corporations like UBS ($10,000), Citigroup ($10,000)
As much as politicians hate to be accused of being influenced by money, the Blue Dogs haven't necessarily gone out of their way to disabuse people of this notion: at last year's Democratic National Convention, the Blue Dog reception (with open bar!) was sponsored and paid for by the telecom industry, which was feeling generous after forty-five of the forty-seven members voted to grant it immunity from civil suits for collusion with unlawful domestic spying.
You got what you voted for and GD forums have provided timely information and I thank you all. Blue Dogs have no shame and have Bitten the hand that voted them in. Remember well citizens, remember well. Who are the
real Blue Dogs? The question irks leaders of the fiscally conservative coalition of House Democrats, which made solid gains in 2008 and now includes 49 members. Every one of them is sincerely committed to reducing the federal deficit, they say. Of the 49, however, only six of them voted against President Obama’s $789 billion economic stimulus package despite their stated, laser-like focus on balancing the budget. Obama’s plan, by his own acknowledgment, will increase the deficit in the short term by roughly $200 billion. (Another five Blue Dogs who had opposed Obama’s original plan switched to “yes” votes on the final version)
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/80xx/doc8027 ... _Trade.pdf
Revenue Nuetral Effects will harm the lower wage earners. The Spiral earnings will continue. "Strategies that reduced net economic costs would often disproportionately benefit higher-income households, whereas the costs of the cap would tend to fall disproportionately on lower-income households."
All they have done is choke more money off to the working class. The Cap and Trade Bill HR 2454 was voted on last Friday. Proponents claim this bill will help the environment, but what it really does is put another nail in the economy’s coffin. They do not care at all and ignore the facts. The events on Capitol Hill last week just demonstrate Washington’s audacity in manufacturing problems just so they can expand government power to solve them.
This is the tipping point IMO