Search found 10 matches: squid

Searched query: squid

by Higgenbotham
Wed Aug 24, 2022 5:21 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

vincecate wrote: Wed Aug 24, 2022 9:14 am
Higgenbotham wrote: Wed Aug 24, 2022 8:43 am Here is my best aeden for this morning.

Replication is not correlation. A bond salesman from the squid twisted the knife in deeper and the anointed await his word from the Hole while the victims are clueless as Hayek warned in '74.

How did I do?
You have the style/content right but the volume aeden generates is far far greater.
Auto redact is on auto pilot. For 40 years bonds were man's best friend. Soon they'll wish they'd kept their dog and we'll all wish the squid had kept theirs. Rates rise for months and only now do they see the end of the tunnel has no light. A 1-2% reaction rally remains the base case into the Hole and should be par for the course if the squid's dog can find his. Flyover country sees what is coming next as demshevik evil comes home to roost.

I gave it my best but I just can't generate the volume.
by vincecate
Wed Aug 24, 2022 9:14 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

Higgenbotham wrote: Wed Aug 24, 2022 8:43 am Here is my best aeden for this morning.

Replication is not correlation. A bond salesman from the squid twisted the knife in deeper and the anointed await his word from the Hole while the victims are clueless as Hayek warned in '74.

How did I do?
You have the style/content right but the volume aeden generates is far far greater.
by Higgenbotham
Wed Aug 24, 2022 8:43 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

Here is my best aeden for this morning.

Replication is not correlation. A bond salesman from the squid twisted the knife in deeper and the anointed await his word from the Hole while the victims are clueless as Hayek warned in '74.

How did I do?
by aeden
Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:09 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-1 ... lders-etfs ty/t

I was reminded a fork in it helps it when its squeezed and the rest of the analogy was when it turns to dust
we are done with them as before. A hose will be needed from the basement up since that's why
the rest of structure has that sickly aroma. Looking back now, indeed 1991 was the inception date of that specific operation
from the 1983 notes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDhkFHC8tO4 leo noted they are confused

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-1 ... urs?page=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkN7KPcr1Xg capital T

"slowly, and then suddenly" famous dead guy we all know here
by aeden
Thu Mar 16, 2017 2:24 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

If we mention lighter fluid you are accused of being repressed.

You’re on your own snowflake as no one has your my back but the local Sheriff if he is on time and the Calvary indeed is not coming, we guessed on pattern recon for that specific again.
Polite was beta bouncers, instead of lighter fluid on the beta bitches seen developing way back cuz.
The main objective of algo trading is not necessarily to maximize profits but rather to control execution costs and market risk. Find the seams it runs in as we warned. Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:12 am
How To Have the Scary Markets Conversation by Carl Richards, Behavior Gap - the critics called it venn diagrams for 8th graders which was verbiage for we did not do our home work either.
Cold, pointless and wrong not to listen to what he did say.
Test the spirits, by spring we shall know.

Sun Feb 21, 2016 7:16 pm
1. Never trust the squid
2. Never venture on water with a zh boat captain

This gist of this article is that, after Hurricane Katrina, the large US insurers with deep pockets pulled out of the gulf coast market, leaving it at the mercy of small undercapitalized insurers who were forced to rely on Bermuda based reinsurance companies. The reinsurance companies charge about $5 per every $1 of actual risk coverage. And now we find out "who" it is once again ripping off the public, none other than the likes of AIG and Goldman Sachs, the Vampire Squid. higg

So you have criminals at Goldman Sachs, Citibank, BoA, etc., who made millions selling CDOs and ARSs, still making millions in bonuses,
still thinking up new financial scams (like "cap and trade" and "universal health care"), still fucking their own customers, and
worrying about PR efforts to stem "conspicuous consumption," so that people won't hate them. This is such debauched, perverted behavior
that it's hard to even describe. John

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-1 ... ful-trader even bears do it
by aedens
Fri Dec 09, 2016 1:27 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

Amazing squid changing color
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OauXCp8l3QI

If we mention lighter fluid you are accused of being repressed.
Your on your own snowflake as no one has your my back but the local Sheriff if is he on time and the Calvary is not coming, we guessed on pattern recon for that specific again.
Polite was beta bouncers, instead of lighter fluid on the beta bitches seen developing way back cuz.
The main objective of algo trading is not necessarily to maximize profits but rather to control execution costs and market risk. Find the seams it runs in as we warned. Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:12 am

How To Have The Scary Markets Conversation by Carl Richards, Behavior Gap - the critics called it venn diagrams for 8th graders which was verbiage for we did not do our home work either. Cold, pointless and wrong not to listen to what he did say.

Test the spirits, by spring we shall know.
by aedens
Sun Feb 21, 2016 7:16 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

1. Never trust the squid
2. Never venture on water with a zh boat captain

We are #timestamping that and we promise to revisit in one year what EPS will be if (and when) oil averages $34 (or less).
02/21/2016 17:48
And while we are amused by Goldman's relentless optimism according to which even a recession will barely impact the US economy, we were truly amazed by the following:

If the US falls into recession and GDP actually declines by 1.0% (300 bp below our baseline forecast) then EPS would equal just $100 per share, a decline of 6% from last year and a 13% drop from the recent EPS peak of $115 in 2014. Coincidentally, the median peak-to-trough fall in EPS around the 13 recessions over the past 80 years equals 12%.

History suggests that these crossovers are rare, but when they happen they have deep and meaningful consequences.... rope burn
The message is clear: This will be a long battle:

Homework.....
Indicators utilized:
Note that the Kansas City Fed has a similar Financial Stress
Index, aka the KCSFI, which is more concise and more focused
on yield spreads.

Interest Rates:
•Effective federal funds rate
•2-year Treasury
•10-year Treasury
•30-year Treasury
•Baa-rated corporate
•Merrill Lynch High-Yield Corporate Master II Index
•Merrill Lynch Asset-Backed Master BBB-rated
Yield Spreads:
•Yield curve: 10-year Treasury minus 3-month Treasury
•Corporate Baa-rated bond minus 10-year Treasury
•Merrill Lynch High-Yield Corporate Master II Index minus
10-year Treasury
•3-month London Interbank Offering Rate–Overnight Index
Swap (LIBOR-OIS) spread
•3-month Treasury-Eurodollar (TED) spread
•3-month commercial paper minus 3-month Treasury bill

Other Indicators:
•J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Plus
•Chicago Board Options Exchange Market Volatility Index (VIX)
•Merrill Lynch Bond Market Volatility Index (1-month)
•10-year nominal Treasury yield minus 10-year Treasury
Inflation Protected Security yield (breakeven inflation rate)
•Vanguard Financials Exchange-Traded Fund (VFH)
by Higgenbotham
Thu May 26, 2011 12:49 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

This gist of this article is that, after Hurricane Katrina, the large US insurers with deep pockets pulled out of the gulf coast market, leaving it at the mercy of small undercapitalized insurers who were forced to rely on Bermuda based reinsurance companies. The reinsurance companies charge about $5 per every $1 of actual risk coverage. And now we find out "who" it is once again ripping off the public, none other than the likes of AIG and Goldman Sachs, the Vampire Squid.
After Hurricane Katrina, some of the highest rollers providing $33 billion to recapitalize the reinsurers of Bermuda included Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs, and private investors recruited by Jeff Greenberg, son of former AIG chairman Hank Greenberg.

These new players demanded paybacks equal to or better than the heady profits rolling off mortgage-backed securities. They sought return percentages from the mid-teens to high 20s, Mike Millete, a managing director of Goldman Sachs, told reinsurance executives during a 2006 industry forum in Bermuda.

In the end, Bermuda reinsurance investors saw a record return on equity, according to a Guy Carpenter analysis. Greenberg had a 26 percent return on Validus Holdings. Lancashire Re gave its New York private equity fund investors a 33 percent return. And in 2009, the largest reinsurer of Florida carriers reported a 38 percent return.

Being in Bermuda, the profits were tax-free.

On the other hand, Florida regulators limit property insurers to a 3.7 percent annual profit on their underwriting activities.

"Putting aside the tremendous human cost of natural catastrophes, as an investment category, cat risk is actually quite wonderful," Greg Richardson, vice president of Harbor Point Re, told his peers at a summit in 2008.

AS INSURERS SPEND more on reinsurance, they have less money to set aside for future storms.
The U.S. hurricanes in 2005, particularly Katrina, left the Bermuda reinsurers that provide most of Florida's hurricane coverage with net losses of $2.1 billion.

Those same reinsurers reported profits of $11.6 billion in 2006 -- a record -- and $11 billion in 2007.
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20 ... ?p=7&tc=pg

State Farm is an investor in a Bermuda reinsurance firm called DaVinci. After State Farm, pulled out of the gulf coast market, DaVinci increased its concentration in that market, with rates of up to 10 times the technical value of the insurance.
A risk assessment done for state regulators shows Northern Capital's coverage from DaVinci had a technical value -- the average annual expected hurricane loss -- of no more than 4 cents per $1 insured.

But DaVinci demanded to be paid 10 times the actual risk. That cost landed on homeowners.

A Herald-Tribune review of scores of reinsurance contracts found similar terms for other companies.

In 2009, Southern Fidelity paid 52 cents for every $1 of protection bought from DaVinci and RenRe. Homeowners Choice paid the two companies 43 cents per $1 of protection. Capitol Preferred also bought high-risk coverage last year at 57 cents on the dollar; Gulfstream paid 32 cents for every $1 of coverage.
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20 ... ?p=7&tc=pg
by MarshAviator
Wed May 26, 2010 12:27 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

Again from ZeroHedge, quoting marketwatch.


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/crash- ... genumber=2
Paul Farrell's latest perspective: "Last March I wrote "6 reasons I'm calling a bottom and a new bull." Today it's time for a new call. We've had a good year. Net gains over 50% in 2009. But now: "Game over, head for the exits." Bears beating bulls. Dow sinking below 6,470...The clock's flashing. Huge point spread. Think bear, think crash, think end of capitalism, think Great Depression II ... This is no buying opportunity, this game's in the refrigerator, call it." So much for Paul's chances of ever getting invited on CNBC.
Now that the MSM is letting a little truth into the articles, we could be in for a real fun time.
Finally now "this time is different" is being seen for what a bunch of BS it is.

And yet of of this writing the DOW (market et al) is up. Fools buying the dip again or robots with low volume algos running amok.
The retail investor would at least get some sympathy from a con artist, none here, GS and the rest really are the "Vampiric squid on the face of humanity".
by John
Thu Aug 06, 2009 8:23 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16827771

Re: Financial topics

Dear Higgie,

It's very kind of you to say that, and I appreciate it. Thank you.

You turned me on to a lot of the detailed stuff, especially what
happened in the 1850s, which is very relevant to what's been
happening in this decade.

But I remember when I started digging into the CDOs, and later the
auction rate securities. I just couldn't believe that such
hare-brained nonsense was now a fundamental part of our financial
system. Up to that point, I thought the housing bubble was just that
-- an ordinary bubble. But anyone with half a brain who looks at CDOs
and ARSs quickly understands that there's massive fraud going on, and
that was apparent years ago.

That's when I really started to get both sick and furious. I still
get sick when I see some of these people. Yesterday I saw Stiglitz
on tv, who is one of the slimiest people around and an architect of
the financial crisis, and watched him as long as I could stand him.
And Krugman is one of the stupidest people on the scene. I'm furious
at these people -- not only because I hold them responsible as the
architects of the current disaster, but because their lives are
now devoted to gaining as much money and publicity from blaming
others for their own crimes. You have Robert Rubin from the Clinton
administration, Henry Paulson from the Bush administration, and Larry
Summers from the Obama administration -- all of them made many
millions of dollars as perpetrators of this massive fraud, and
they're still running things. They don't give a damn about anything
but saving their own asses.

Now that I've gotten started on this rant, we have to remember that
the financial crisis was executed by the people still in charge today
at Citibank, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, etc. On the one hand,
these people are fucking over their own customers by reducing credit
and charging 25-30% interest rates. On the other hand, they're
paying themselves million dollar bonuses.

And why are they paying themselves million dollar bonuses? This is a
point that you never hear mentioned in the mainstream media. Why are
they so afraid of losing these employees? The more I think about
this, the more I keep coming back to the same reason. The employees
they're afraid of losing are the criminals who perpetrated the fraud,
and if one of those employees left, he might cooperate with
authorities in bringing criminal charges against the firm he left. In
other words, the ones who are receiving million dollar bonuses are
self-identifying as the ones should go to jail.

Here's something that's good for a laugh:
> Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein is telling employees of the
> powerful bank to avoid displays of conspicuous consumption, the
> New York Post reports.

> Goldman has faced a spate of bad press of late, including a
> Rolling Stone article casting it as "a great vampire squid wrapped
> around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel
> into anything that smells like money" and a New York magazine
> piece asking if the company is "evil." (See "The Shine Comes Off
> Of Goldman Sachs" for more.)

> Blankfein appears to be trying to stem the tide by convincing
> employees to keep a low profile – and maybe put off buying that
> fancy new mansion until the economy has improved.

> http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/04 ... ?tag=stack
So you have criminals at Goldman Sachs, Citibank, BoA, etc., who made
millions selling CDOs and ARSs, still making millions in bonuses,
still thinking up new financial scams (like "cap and trade" and
"universal health care"), still fucking their own customers, and
worrying about PR efforts to stem "conspicuous consumption," so that
people won't hate them. This is such debauched, perverted behavior
that it's hard to even describe.

I've mentioned in the past that all the anti-bank rhetoric that we're
hearing today is very familiar to me, because I used to hear it from
my parents and my teachers in the 1950s, and now we can really see
why. If Blankfein thinks that a PR effort is going to change
people's attitudes towards Goldman Sachs, then he can take his PR
effort and shove it up his ass.

Whew! That's quite a "stream of consciousness" road I just traveled
-- from a simple discussion of Mike Alexander to expletives about
Goldman Sachs. Hmmmm. How much do I have to tone this down when I
post it on the web log?

John