Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

It is all happening again isn't it?

Given the facts. Yes.

Freud also read Nietzsche as a student and analogies between their work were pointed out almost as soon as he developed a "cult" following.
Freud and Nietzsche had a common acquaintance in Lou Andreas-Salomé, a Russian-born psychoanalyst and author.

John did narrow it down for a few.
Also we know many will not keep up. Not an issue just constraints and real long term effects already seen.

I wish I could promise a better response tomorrow, but don't count on it.
Anyway, thanks for providing an environment where I can come and discuss things - it is appreciated.
More than few.... we do read...

Debt is the mechanism of control and will never ever be forgiven.
UBI would prolong the lives of the Untermensch that the WEF wants gone.
The United States is in game it cannot win with this level of depravity and evil.
The Senate and the rope burn warning is way past clear now.
As we have noted the velvet rope did lead to the obvious.

Tulips could not be plugged in either but they lust after digital bitcoins as mad men with urine streming down there trousers
just as Freud did wanting to in analysis of Jung.
The insanity of the masses is not unique. Ask any program that works what happens.
It is in the Human Action Scholar's edition.

Herr Commissioner Oettinger,
Please note that Hillary's insulting of the "deplorables" didn't work very well for her.
If the Italians harbored any doubts that these unelected European elites don't give a fuck about them or their future,
it is gone now.

Earlier you had Anarchist physician Raphael Friedeberg moved to Ascona in 1904, attracting many other anarchists to the area. Artists and other famous people attracted to this hill included Hermann Hesse, Carl Jung, Erich Maria Remarque, Hugo Ball, Else Lasker-Schüler, Stefan George, Isadora Duncan, Carl Eugen Keel, Paul Klee, Carlo Mense, Arnold Ehret, Rudolf Steiner, Mary Wigman, Max Picard, Ernst Toller, Henry van de Velde, Fanny zu Reventlow, Rudolf von Laban, Frieda and Else von Richthofen, Otto Gross, Erich Mühsam, Karl Wilhelm Diefenbach, Walter Segal, Max Weber, Gustav Stresemann, and Gustav Nagel.

H you know what is coming and they have one motive only as what they wish to inflict on us.

Notes:
For students of official propaganda, manipulation of public opinion, psychological conditioning, and emotional coercion, it doesn’t get much better than this. As Trump and his army of Goldman Sachs guys, corporate CEOs, and Christian zealots slouch toward inauguration day, we are being treated to a master class in coordinated media manipulation that is making Goebbels look like an amateur. This may not be immediately apparent,
Nope clear as broken clock right twice a day since maff is for liberals to balance.
Slouch as a VERB: stand, move, or sit in a lazy, drooping way:
synonyms: slump • hunch • loll • droop • sag • stoop
Dated. bend one side of the brim of (a hat) downwards.
"a travelling hat slouched over his eyes"
Noun. a lazy, drooping posture or movement:
"his stance was a round-shouldered slouch"
Informal, an incompetent person:
Hmm projection kinda fits that structure
See Bella V. Dodd on effects

Chief among the common misconceptions about the way official propaganda works is the notion that its goal is to deceive the public into believing things that are not “the truth” (that Trump is a Russian agent, for example, or that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, or that the terrorists hate us for our freedom, et cetera). However….
How they preserve a current Foundation in mores and motives since second or third derivatives do not exist either, ok we be writing option warrants then …. Shall we convey his attributes?
The primary aim of official propaganda is to generate an “official narrative” that can be mindlessly repeated by the ruling classes and those who support and identify with them. This official narrative does not have to make sense, or to stand up to any sort of serious scrutiny. Its factualness is not the point. The point is to draw a Maginot line, a defensive ideological boundary, between “the truth” as defined by the ruling classes and any other “truth” that contradicts their narrative.
This as Father put it, a bent of mind as Umberto Terracini : At the age of 16 he joined the Socialist Youth League (FGS), an unusual choice for a young student of the “Liceo classico”, and distinguished himself in the propaganda against the Libyan war. He soon became secretary of the Piedmontese branch of FGS and in 1914 vigorously campaigned against Italy’s intervention in World War I. Two years later he was arrested for the first time for anti-war activities. Shortly afterwards was called up for the military service and sent to the front. Demobilized in 1919, he completed his law degree at Turin University. Along with Gramsci, Togliatti and Tasca, he was one of the founders of “L’Ordine Nuovo”, a left socialist journal whose programme Lenin would acknowledge in early 1920 to be the closest to that of the Third International.
Classic utilitiarian texts; defending utilitarianism from its critics; its relation with collectivism and hedonism to the ultimate aim of utilitarianism.
They concluded both should be destroyed.
Antonio Gramsci and George Lukacs carried the torch and created a strategy for destroying both Christian influence and the Western culture itself.
Instead of calling for a communist revolution, as they had in Russia, they decided they should seize political power last, after what they called "A Long March Through The Institutions" of the West.

social pathogens

narratives : After the first crude bloodletting they always move to the Social dialectic route as we noted the Neo-Marxist strategies of Antonio Gramsci an Italian Communist relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process rather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci's transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed today. Also after reading Tolstoy's, The Kingdom of God is Within You, it convinced Gandhi to avoid violence and espouse nonviolent resistance. Tolstoy also seen the rise and fall of it before it even existed, it leveled me when I first read it. These people today will never be able to allow others to be left alone in peace.
As Richard Pipes has pointed out [in 'Survival is Not Enough', Simon and Schuster, New York, 1984, page 80], 'such mastery is secured, in the first place, by control of the organs of information'. The objective is 'to control thought at the source - that is, in the mind that absorbs and processes the information - and the best way of accomplishing this is by shaping words and phrases in the desired manner'.
The problem is not just a handful of government villains, the problem is US, the weak and complicit electorate we've become. As we also know when the people find they can vote themselves money that will herald the end of the republic Franklin warned since also we know that no thought of recompense other than the goodwill of the community can sustain prosperity and freedom.
http://biography.yourdictionary.com/saul-david-alinsky
1. Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people
2. Poverty - Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3. Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4. Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5. Welfare - Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)
6. Education - Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school
7. Religion - Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8. Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take Tax the wealthy with the support of the poor.

The last thing Political Correctness wants is for people to figure out it’s a form of Marxism. So instead they decide to name it the Institute for Social Research. Economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation.

Basis is simple. Taxpayers are idiots to support it. Adjectives are just messengers being shot.

Imagine this Maginot line as a circular wall surrounded by inhospitable territory. Inside the wall is “normal” society, gainful employment, career advancement, and all the other considerable benefits of cooperating with the ruling classes. Outside the wall is poverty, anxiety, social and professional stigmatization, and various other forms of suffering. Which side of the wall do you want to be on? Every day, in countless ways, each of us are asked and have to answer this question. Conform, and there’s a place for you inside. Refuse, and … well, good luck out there. In openly despotic societies, the stakes involved in making this choice (to conform or dissent) are often life and death. In our relatively liberal Western societies (for those of us who are not militant guerillas), the consequences of not conforming to the official narrative are usually subtler. Despite that, the pressure is still intense. Conforming to the consensus “reality” generated by these official narratives is price of admission to the inner sanctum, where the jobs, money, professional prestige, and the other rewards of Capitalism are. Conforming does not require belief. It requires allegiance and rote obedience. What one actually believes is completely irrelevant, as long as one parrots the official narrative.
https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2014/c ... s/honduras

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/chap4.pdf Laddie
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

Self-licking ice cream cones are everywhere.
As it was said before to keeping Your Feathers Numbered, few can fathom the silent weapons of the actual silent war. Our view, would suffice to say the seal in the forehead. Even less can understand as Churchill forwarded as unleashed upon them in a later relenting tone for simplicity’s sake.
According to Golitsyn, after the United States military is eliminated as a strategic threat to Russia, the long-range strategic Russian plan is to pursue Lenin’s goal of replacing nation states with collectivist model of regional governments as a stepping-stone to global governance. Isn’t that exactly what we see with the European Union, the North American Union and the emerging African Union? In order to achieve their final goal, Golitsyn stated that Russia, after lulling America to sleep, will join with China in order to attack the United States from both the outside and inside as he detailed that “In each of these the scissors strategy will play its part; probably, as the final stroke, the scissors blades will close. The element of apparent duality in Soviet and Chinese policies will disappear. The hitherto concealed coordination between them will become visible and predominant. The Soviets and the Chinese will be officially reconciled. Thus the scissors strategy will develop logically into the strategy of one clenched fist to provide the foundation and driving force of a world communist federation…before long, the communist strategists might be persuaded that the balance had swung irreversibly in their favor. In that event they might well decide on a Sino-Soviet ‘reconciliation.’
The scissors strategy would give way to the strategy of “one clenched fist.” The enemies now are gathered from within. At that point the shift in the political and military balance will be plain for all to see. This is includes the compromising of key American politicians who will be used to further the communist takeover agenda.
Putin as eye for eye, bone for bone is logic even Independents understand. I like the Democrats spending as much as the Duma spending gazprom into oblivion as Blackrocks Ishares fineprint warned of as sheep pens. In other words, 80% of the companies that make up the IBB are either "adjusted" or outright excluded from P/E calculation so as we asked define beta. If you look at the policies from even FDR day it is an overlay to the unintended consequences from Benn Steil's account then as to connect the dots today seen very clearly again. As Stalin before him, time will allow themselves to kill the political impediments of a region.
Communism was a creation of International Finance. Churchill was correct it was going to end badly. For a possible explanation, one should perhaps start with the trauma of the Bolshevik Revolution. “Bolshevism is not a policy; it is a disease,” Churchill said in the House of Commons on 29 May 1919, adding, “it is not a creed; it is a pestilence,” thus starting a long series of highly offensive medical metaphors in his attacks on the Bolsheviks. In June, he described them with the suggestion of mental illness as a “league of failures, the criminals, the morbid, the deranged and the distraught.” A variant was “the vampire which sucks the blood from his victims,” used in the House of Commons in March. Later in the year, on 6 November, he took up again his extreme vocabulary of insidious epidemics in his description of Lenin’s journey back from Switzerland in the House of Commons:

Lenin was sent into Russia by the Germans in the same way that you might send a phial containing a culture of typhoid or cholera to be poured into the water supply of a great city, and it worked with amazing accuracy. May 8th in 1887, a young revolutionary went to the gallows with four other comrades for an attempt on the life of Tsar Alexander III.
Alexander (or Aleksandr) Ilyich Ulyanov was among 15 members of Narodnaya Volya, the terroristic revolutionary organization, nabbed (in an “amateurish” scheme) trying to blow up the monarch on the anniversary of his Father’s assassination. The five of these who refused to plead for mercy paid for their principles with their necks. Lenins brother.
“The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences…” – Winston Churchill

The point of all this propaganda is to delegitimize Donald Trump, and to prophylactically reassert the neoliberal ruling classes’ monopoly on power, “reality,” and “truth.” In case this wasn’t already abundantly clear, the neoliberal ruling classes have no intention of giving up control of the global capitalist pseudo-empire they’ve been working to establish these last sixty years. They’re going to delegitimize and stigmatize Trump (and any other symbol of nationalist backlash or resistance to transnational Capitalism), bide their time for the next four years, and then install another of their loyal servants … after which life will go back to “normal,” and liberals will do their best to forget this unfortunate period where they pretended to believe this insipid neo-McCarthyite nonsense.

Our sole duty is to avoid kulturkampf

In connection with the so-called Kulturkampf, the struggle between the state and the Roman Catholic Church, the school law of 1872 reasserted the absolute right of the state alone to the supervision of the schools.

she smiles the whole time
"thanks for having me, Anderson"

Any thoughts on 2 Ice Floes? Nice guy with a particular bent of mind as Father Malachi wrote off

It would infer what Freud worshiped some contend as Topographical models of Personality. Id, Ego, Superego.
Discussion can avoid misnomers of Democrats today having SSRIs control.

http://www.schillerinstitute.org/conf-i ... icino.html

You see, what Freud did, was take the blind, mechanical forces of biology described by Darwin, and show that they operated on the mind. For instance, some people get the idea that they can help the whole human race; but, Freud told everybody that this was an illusion, like religion.

Origins of the Frankfurt School is we are all affected by the people we interact with, many of whom we don’t even know personally. Our social environments play a significant role in how we view ourselves, and conversely, how we see ourselves impacts our view of the world.

The effects to the dialectic root scripted from even the basic model of social democratist, communal socialist or as FDR knew there are no accidents to the synthesis to control metrics.

http://www.conspiracyschool.com/blog/ho ... d-kabbalah

Of these the most influential is what is called "education." Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part.... It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class.

Freud also read Nietzsche as a student and analogies between their work were pointed out almost as soon as he developed a following. Freud and Nietzsche had a common acquaintance in Lou Andreas-Salomé, a Russian-born psychoanalyst and author.

We know what happed on both sides of the wall. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gulag+archpel ... a&ia=about
http://reformed-theology.org/html/books ... ter_02.htm

As we read last week the reds are still pissed we eliminated the flash CMOS when it was still uncool on the weekend hairpin sand box antics to return to sender. Ping, Thar she blows time fer the new board she will not boot captain.
Thing have changed as we have recently have seen and I do not regret given the affairs seen unfolding.

What we see today is the margin clusters and those who stayed in the bolt on application mindsets in MBA cargo cult ethics scaled up as we see.
FBI gets flees from the foundation principle as we already knew coming.

The change, of change.

Shaw was a Fabian Socialist. If you want the worst, up front, from an unbiased source, we have Stanley Weintraub’s “GBS and the Despots” in the August 22, 2011, Times Literary Supplement. Weintraub is a distinguished Shaw scholar, and editor of Bernard Shaw: The Diaries 1885–1897. In 1927 Shaw published in the London Daily News a letter titled “Bernard Shaw on Mussolini: A Defence.” He came under sharp attack for this by both socialists and liberals, but persisted in his admiration of Mussolini throughout the 1930s. While sharply condemning Hitler’s anti-Semitism, he spoke positively about the Nazis for renouncing the Versailles Treaty, which Shaw had opposed, and for their supposed economic reforms, writing in 1935, “The Nazi movement is in many respects one which has my warmest sympathy.” As late as 1944, deep into World War II, when he was strongly supporting the British war effort against Germany, he still in print had something positive to say about Hitler’s Mein Kampf. He claimed that he was a National Socialist before Hitler was. He was well-disposed toward Oswald Mosley, Britain’s home-grown fascist demagogue, declaring Mosley “the only striking personality in British politics.” He turned against the German Nazis and Italian fascists during World War II, but never wavered from his adulation for the Soviet Union, first under Lenin, and then, undiminished, under Stalin.
As it happens, George Orwell in his 1946 pamphlet James Burnham and the Managerial Revolution does shed light on some claim’s that Shaw’s dual embrace of communism and fascism was broadly typical of Fabians or other sorts of socialists:
“English writers who consider Communism and Fascism to be the same thing invariably hold that both are monstrous evils which must be fought to the death; on the other hand, any Englishman who believes Communism and Fascism to be opposites will feel that he ought to side with one or the other. The only exception I am able to think of is Bernard Shaw, who, for some years at any rate, declared Communism and Fascism to be much the same thing, and was in favor of both of them.”
The warning of not being hot or cold brings its own rewards.
Sympathy for Italian fascism, and even German Nazism, was widespread after the bloody debacle of World War I and the Great Depression, and far more so on the right than on the left, Shaw being an outlier here.
The very idea that there is such a thing as social change dates mainly from the Industrial Revolution, when it became obvious in daily life. Much of philosophy, social theorizing, and political organizing since has aimed to figure out to what degree we can have effective input into our own future, to guide the unfolding changes rather than simply submit to them. Many paths forward have been embraced only to prove disastrous later. Communism and fascism are the textbook examples. Darwin showed that there was biological change as well as political and economic change. Eugenics was an attempt to take charge of human evolution, which was ultimately found to be far more difficult and to involve a far greater potential for evil than its first advocates imagined.

His views written are condensed as such here "These, however, are merely expedients of transition. The Russian proletariat is now growing its own professional and organizing class; and the ex-bourgeois is dying out, after seeing his children receive a sound Communist education and being lectured by them on his old fashioned prejudices. And the planners of the Soviet State have no time to bother about moribund questions; for they are confronted with the new and overwhelming necessity for exterminating the peasants, who still exist in formidable numbers. The notion that a civilized State can be made out of any sort of human material is one of our old Radical delusions."
As we are today it has announced its principal effect, as simply another delusionary and subsidized death tissue merchants on the taxpayers. Science cannot only be considered for what it is, but as it does. The inability to create dirt in a garden of consequences over times already written in better books.

The Spiral of Silence Theory is a political science and mass communication theory proposed by the German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, which stipulates that individuals have a fear of isolation, which results from the idea that a social group or the society in general might isolate, neglect, or exclude members due to the members' opinions. This fear of isolation consequently leads to remaining silent instead of voicing opinions. Media is an important factor that relates to both the dominant idea and people's perception of the dominant idea. The assessment of one's social environment may not always correlate with reality.

Edward Bernays, Sigmund Freud’s nephew, changed that as his proudest accomplishment was the creation of a nation of female tobacco addicts in the 1920s. Bernays, who was well-connected in the media, asked photographer friends to take photos of slim, pretty women smoking. He also paid physicians to go on record stating that cigarettes were an important part of a meal because the smoke “disinfects the mouth and soothes the nerves.”
The quote above comes from the book Made by Hand by Mark Frauenfelder, editor of Make magazine. He goes on to explain other things Bernays did such as persuading restaurants to add cigarettes to the desert menu and staging public events to make it look like women smoked openly.
The campaigns was quite effective. By the end of 1928, American Tobacco’s annual revenue increased by $32 million (about $400 million in today’s money, adjusted for inflation) over the previous year.

Nothing new under the Sun on His footstool.

Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory.

The last thing Political Correctness wants is for people to figure out it’s a form of Marxism. So instead they decide to name it the Institute for Social Research.

Economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation.

Basis is simple. Taxpayers are idiots to support it.

Adjectives are just messengers being shot. 1861 Internecine Slaughter, not a civil war.....

"Hear, you people’’ (all of them, so the margin reads it), "all you that are now within hearing, and all others that hear it at second hand.’’ It is an unusual construction; but those words with which Micah begins his prophecy are the very same in the original with those wherewith Micaiah ended his, 1 Ki. 22:28 . The earth is called upon, with all that therein is, to hear what the prophet has to say: Hearken, O earth! The earth shall be made to shake under the stroke and weight of the judgments coming; sooner will the earth hear than this stupid senseless people; but God will be heard when he pleads. If the church, and those in it, will not hear, the earth, and those in it, shall, and shame them. God himself is appealed to, and his omniscience, power, and justice, are vouched in testimony against this people: "Let the Lord God be witness against you, a witness that you had fair warning given you, that your prophets did their duty faithfully as watchmen, but you would not take the warning.


A 20th-century conspiracy theory regards the Frankfurt School as the origin of a contemporary movement in the political left to destroy western culture, referred to as "Cultural Marxism" by theory proponents.[50][51] It advocates the idea that multiculturalism and political correctness are products of critical theory, which originated with the Frankfurt School. The theory is associated with American religious paleoconservatives such as William Lind, Pat Buchanan and Paul Weyrich, and has received support from the Free Congress Foundation.[52][53][54][55]

Although it became more widespread in the late 1990s and 2000s, the modern iteration of the theory originated within Michael Minnicino's 1992 essay "New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness'", published in Fidelio Magazine by the Schiller Institute.[56][57][58] The Schiller Institute, a branch of the LaRouche movement, further promoted the idea in 1994.[59] The Minnicino article charges that the Frankfurt School promoted Modernism in the arts as a form of Cultural pessimism, and played a role in shaping the 1960s counterculture.[56] In 1999 Lind led the creation of an hour-long program, Political Correctness: The Frankfurt School.[57] The documentary

"... spawned a number of condensed textual versions, which were reproduced on a number of radical right-wing sites. These in turn led to a welter of new videos now available on YouTube, which feature an odd cast of pseudo-experts regurgitating exactly the same line. The message is numbingly simplistic: all the ills of modern American culture, from feminism, affirmative action, sexual liberation and gay rights to the decay of traditional education and even environmentalism are ultimately attributable to the insidious influence of the members of the Institute for Social Research who came to America in the 1930's."[57]

Dr. Heidi Beirich likewise claims the concept is used to demonize various conservative "bêtes noires" including "feminists, homosexuals, secular humanists, multiculturalist, sex educators, environmentalist, immigrants, and black nationalists."[60]

According to Chip Berlet, who specializes in the study of extreme right-wing movements, the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory found fertile ground within the Tea Party movement of 2009, with contributions published in the American Thinker and WorldNetDaily highlighted by some Tea Party websites.[61][62]

More recently, the Norwegian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik included the term in his self-authored document "2083: A European Declaration of Independence", which along with the Free Congress Foundation's "Political Correctness: A Short History of an Ideology" was e-mailed to 1,003 addresses about 90 minutes before the 2011 bomb blast in Oslo for which Breivik was responsible.[63][64][65]

Philosopher and political science lecturer Jérôme Jamin has stated that "Next to the global dimension of the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, there is its innovative and original dimension, which lets its authors avoid racist discourses and pretend to be defenders of democracy".[52] Professor and Oxford Fellow Matthew Feldman has traced the terminology back to the pre-war German concept of Cultural Bolshevism locating it as part of the degeneration discourse that aided in Hitler's rise to power.[66] William S. Lind confirms this as his period of interest, claiming that "It [Cultural Marxism] is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I."[67]

^ Lind, William S. "What is Cultural Marxism?". Maryland Thursday Meeting. Retrieved 9 April 2015.
52.^ Jump up to: a b Jamin, Jérôme (2014). "Cultural Marxism and the Radical Right". In Shekhovtsov, A.; Jackson, P. The Post-War Anglo-American Far Right: A Special Relationship of Hate. The Post-War Anglo-American Far Right: A Special Relationship of Hate (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan). pp. 84–103. doi:10.1057/9781137396211.0009. ISBN 978-1-137-39619-8. Retrieved 18 January 2015.
53.Jump up ^ Richardson, John E. "‘Cultural-Marxism’ and the British National Party: a transnational discourse". In Copsey, Nigel; Richardson, John E. Cultures of Post-War British Fascism.
54.Jump up ^ Wodak, ed. by Ruth; KhosraviNik, Majid; Mral, Brigitte (2012). Right wing populism in Europe : politics and discourse (1st. publ. 2013. ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 96,97. ISBN 978-1780932453. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
55.Jump up ^ Weyrich, Paul. "Letter to Conservatives by Paul M. Weyrich". Conservative Think Tank: "The National Center for Public Policy Research". Retrieved 30 November 2015.
56.^ Jump up to: a b "New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and 'Political Correctness'", Schiller Institute
57.^ Jump up to: a b c Jay, Martin (2010), "Dialectic of Counter-Enlightenment: The Frankfurt School as Scapegoat of the Lunatic Fringe". Salmagundi (Fall 2010-Winter 2011, 168–169): 30–40.
58.Jump up ^ Jay (2010) notes that Daniel Estulin's book cites this essay and that the Free Congress Foundation's program was inspired by it.
59.Jump up ^ Michael Minnicino (1994), Freud and the Frankfurt School (Schiller Institute 1994), part of "Solving the Paradox of Current World History", a conference report published in Executive Intelligence Review
60.Jump up ^ Perry, Barbara (ed.); Beirich, Heidi (2009). Hate crimes [vol.5]. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers. p. 119. ISBN 0275995690. Retrieved 30 November 2015.
61.Jump up ^ Berlet, Chip (July 2012). "Collectivists, Communists, Labor Bosses, and Treason: The Tea Parties as Right-Wing Populist Counter-Subversion Panic". Critical Sociology 38 (4): 565–587. doi:10.1177/0896920511434750.
62.Jump up ^ Truman, David. "What is Cultural Marxism?". Australian Tea Party. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
63.Jump up ^ "'Breivik manifesto' details chilling attack preparation". BBC News. 24 July 2011. Retrieved 2 August 2015.
64.Jump up ^ Trilling, Daniel (18 April 2012). "Who are Breivik’s fellow travellers?". New Statesman. Retrieved 18 July 2015.
65.Jump up ^ Buruma, Ian. "Breivik's Call to Arms". Qantara. German Federal Agency for Civic Education & Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 25 July 2015.
66.Jump up ^ Matthew, Feldman; Griffin, Roger (editor) (2003). Fascism: Fascism and culture (1. publ. ed.). New York: Routledge. p. 343. ISBN 978-0415290180. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
67.Jump up ^ Lind, William S. "The Origins of Political Correctness". Accuracy in Academia. Accuracy in Academia/Daniel J. Flynn. Retrieved 8 November 2015.

http://www.robertboynton.com/articleDis ... ticle_id=9

New Age, collective unconscious, synchronicity, anima, the two dimensions of personality
(extroverted, introverted), man's four basic functions (thinking, feeling, sensation and intuition)

Freud got so pissed at Jung he pissed his pants and stated I will analyze you.
His cocaine addition haunted him until his grave.
The result is a more academic....
Rest in peace little brother. http://www.freep.com/article/20140328/N ... d-Detroit-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sg_1Z0V ... D4D62161BD

http://oilprice.com/Finance/the-Economy ... eness.html With the stroke of a pen, the government creates fiat money, thus increasing the quantity of money and credit. After a few years, the people, the workers, even the unions, began to understand what was going on. They came to realize that currency devaluation had reduced their real wages. And Keynes said, in effect, "Certainly mass unemployment prolonged year after year, is a very unsatisfactory condition." But instead of suggesting that wage rates could and should be adjusted to market conditions, he said, in effect, "If one devalues the currency and the workers are not clever enough to realize it, they will not offer resistance against a drop in real wage rates, as long as nominal wage rates remain the same." In other words, Lord Keynes was saying that if a man gets the same amount of sterling today as he got before the currency was devalued, he will not realize that he is, in fact, now getting less.

How is the migrant imports effecting quality and energy margins in the EU zone and who built a plant here just for that reason? Vlad was special when he said we have our very own Detroit now.
Point being they can only be subsidized to function and must have oil over over $80.00 as not to implode and it appears $110.00 here not to decimate the already wasting vanilla market here.
As we noted real estate locally has just had a record tax property sale.

http://www.freep.com/article/20130908/N ... il-s-Night Young push it into critical mass with uncontrolled spending
attitude and it continued for decades. Now they want to make the whole and all areas detroit. Point is they are insane drunken spenders on out very unborn now.

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... ght#p18159 is and ought for the total effect

http://falkenblog.blogspot.com/2013/09/ ... index.html not all animals are equal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbuLuHsxxlM Reference: Pluralism was never Jung's (or Freud's) strong suit. Bair occasionally goes too far, as when she insists that the man -- so canny and manipulative in every other dimension of his life -- was naïve in his dealings with the Nazis. In this respect, Jung's case resembles that of another charismatic intellectual, the philosopher Martin Heidegger, who was much more of a collaborator than Jung. These ambitious men were not naïve; they were overconfident about their ability to manipulate the Nazis and were hopelessly outplayed. The Hegelian dialectic as forwarded in the forums is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution. If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. When we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box. Hegel's dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship. If you properly discern Sismondi’s Nouveaux principes d’ economie politique you will see influence by both Smith and Rousseau and Marx who included it into his work and the Political reality. It will fail since darkness can never exist in the light. Sat Jan 12, 2013 7:52 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=en ... nHmwg&NR=1 Lossen up G we are getting there so buy GE and go back to sleep.

http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ ... ull#ref-28

POMO recycle and PD has induced confusion as they worship and forward technicals as we have seen and listed before. They will wish to adhere and cleve to the January effect but we know better. I was expecting a exhaustion drift on my part alone and the basket offsets have kept me up and beyond even to date on acount (a) and no we never abandoned counts or other indicators on (b) either. The Market will speak when it is ready and I will just have to acept a lower beta risk ladder for now. The when, or if actual traction commences from the vaunted transitory they press who knows since you have seen the transition we noted. As we know from the last massacre when consolidations and mergers ended the actual value at the margin merged into the nightmare we have witnessed in timeless cycles that was created for the induced cartels. FDR made it plain clear no accidents just intent. If you think blue or red you are an idiot. http://reformed-theology.org/html/books ... index.html

Evidence from public opinion polls and corporate bond markets shows that FDR’s policies prevented a robust recovery of long-term private investment by significantly reducing investors’ confidence in the durability of private property rights. Not until the New Deal/war economy ended and resources became available for peacetime production did private investment—and the nation’s economic health—fully recover. I plan on this caution as before since fact is
due diligence. The Carlyle Group Purchases 55% Stake in Commodities Investment Manager Vermillion Asset Management and they said you are this, and that when we seen the kill switches. http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/108 ... r?page=0,1
We posted well and way over 20,000 workers decimated to seal that vein for PAC. The 2012 election Price Tag was $8 Billion, assholes as people starve.
Now the election is over and they got the memo that the power cord you plugged in the wall is still coal fired so they relaxed on the coal or the nation goes black out. Also, Karzi is the thought on them to wait for so long since our back teeth have been floating Washington on getting our people home who
served. You did not honor us, or them for the time you insisted as needed and ours fullfilled there service and listened to the elders and have retired.
Rubbish on your team. http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/v ... ain#p16628
Keynes also made the following clear and unequivocal declarations:
I believe the future lies with,
1.State trading for commodities;
2.International cartels for necessary manufactures; and
3.Quantitive import restrictions for nonessential manufactures.
Yet all these future instrumentalities for orderly economic life in the future you seek to outlaw.
Everybody know's what is going on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbuLuHsxxlM
port side view today
Reference: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cost+of+2012+ ... n+campaign
Reference: Pluralism was never Jung's (or Freud's) strong suit. Bair occasionally goes too far, as when she insists that the man -- so canny and manipulative in every other dimension of his life -- was naïve in his dealings with the Nazis. In this respect, Jung's case resembles that of another charismatic intellectual, the philosopher Martin Heidegger, who was much more of a collaborator than Jung. These ambitious men were not naïve; they were overconfident about their ability to manipulate the Nazis and were hopelessly outplayed. The Hegelian dialectic as forwarded in the forums is the framework for guiding our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution. If we do not understand how the Hegelian dialectic shapes our perceptions of the world, then we do not know how we are helping to implement the vision. When we remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box. Hegel's dialectic is the tool which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship. If you properly discern Sismondi’s Nouveaux principes d’ economie politique you will see influence by both Smith and Rousseau and Marx who included it into his work and the Political reality. It will fail since darkness can never exist in the light.