Search found 941 matches: cycle 24

Searched query: cycle 24

ignored: 24

by aeden
Sat Sep 16, 2023 6:01 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

Pelosi Ambushed By Illegal Immigrants | Ends Event In Pure PANIC

game over - collapse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldHF1RrmaTk

am in Costa Rica I see hundreds of Venezuelans every time I go down to the coastal road. They get maps in Panama as they cross the border. They are panhandling at all the supermarkets. I feel bad for the Ticos who depend on handouts, as these bad actors have invaded the space, and have an attitude like people owe them a free ride. The problem the instigators in the USSA are causing is global. It's gonna blow up in somebody's face pretty soon. There are not resources enough for it down here either. But it just continues all hush hush like. No one is being returned home... they just move them along heading your way.

welfare whitey the serf will go under
Angry New Yorkers Shout-Down AOC & Nadler Over Immigrant Crisis.
When they are ripped to shreds, we can note a start to the woke Alinksy and Gramnsci grifter diseases cure.

"People are scared. They’re afraid to walk on the streets..." Zone after Zone.

The bourgeoisie will remember my carbuncles until their dying day, Marx told Engels in a letter from 1867.
The analysis we utilized is from the 1840 to 1884 intellectual pivot point from the Pari café liberals Sismondi mentioned also.
Marx's birth name name is Chaim Hirschel Mordechai. As Robert Friedman warned us the deracinated facts and the saying 2 plus 2 will never
equal 4 until in their skulls until the totalitarian boot kicks them in the balls.

Our guys in Iowa had been cut down in utter depravity back then. Murdered. Literal school buses of illegals brought in.
Then it happened again. Years later the sticky wage cults are taking you out. Your fools.
Godwin's law will increase.
Reinmann effect increasing.

In military doctrine this has its roots in MindWars, a guide to mass deception, written by Col. Michael Aquino in 1980.
In fifth generation warfare, the military no longer delineates between the state of war and peace. The public becomes the enemy or, at best, collateral damage.
Britain’s head of the Army until Nov 2021, Gen Sir Nick Carter, warned that “political warfare has returned… a strategy that is designed to undermine cohesion, erode economic, political and social resilience.”
Did it escape his notice that The Great Reset ushers in precisely that: a governance system that in which “governancers” are unaccountable, elected leaders are shoved aside and decision making is opaque and corrupted.

Every one from coffee shop grass roots to shelters knows they are going down.
Winter will be brutal in the catastrophic effect of the Kondratiev wave construct since contract was attacked by central planning deviants.
Women will not walk across the street to buy coffee in town.

Meanwhile: Feb 20, 2015 9:05 am
We can underpin it with Klingberg and his cycle of political deviants. Doctor Quigley seen it early just saying.
Impossible to move the ball down the field now. Tactical consolidation as we warned from day one to preserve capital to avoid
the carnage of the FSA consuming fixed capital.
I have not changed my view. Locally try to explain the carnage imposed on us. No way are they sharp enough to have a point we garner.

Yea we read the RAND study review. No winners.

thread: amos, bantu, peleg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z66_AKHYaAA
by aeden
Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:54 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

Cool Breeze wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 12:27 pm Predictions on tomorrow's Powell/FOMC decision? Up .25 or pause?
Yes as the Taylor rule points out Jevons failures as the general Mathematical Theory of Political Economy
to the current Hobsons choice confusion not even listening to Keynes while in the Klingberg political deviants cycle.
Menticide of design.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAKsZIbh-gs
by Cool Breeze
Tue Mar 14, 2023 10:22 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

richard5za wrote: Tue Mar 14, 2023 7:56 am If I had been sold by your passion for BTC and bought in, I would have lost a fortune! Stock markets make fools of us all and if that was not the case with you then you would be happily playing with your billions somewhere else other than this website.
If you had been "sold" on BTC, you're admitting you don't understand it, so of course you shouldn't have, because you don't. The recommendation, I don't know why you guys can't get this through your thick skulls, is to buy and hold. Ironic that you talk about cycles, but for some reason "you would have lost a fortune" - NO - you would have lost something if you SOLD it, which was never the recommendation and shows you aren't reading, listening, or doing your homework. I'm not scared, I have bought in the teens before, and bought at 24 and 45. I'm not worried at all, because I know what this asset is, and I know it also goes through cycles. One is coming up, and as I have predicted, it will cycle to new all time highs. Know what's going to happen when that occurs around here? Crickets. No talk of "tulips" or other dumb stuff most of the people say here, even though BTC is safe and secure (though volatile) for almost 15 years now. Yeah, tulips. What a low level joke analysis that is, said by many people here.

Let's recap:

I described the economic circumstances, laid out over many posts, perfectly. Inflation is out of control, transitory was a lie, and it is. It can cause disinflation because of the government's reaction (raising rates) or by collapsing the economy, but supply will still outstrip demand, and the deflation call of John et al has been wrong for over 2 years now. With that prediction, I made people a lot of money, including myself. Actionable, seeing things as they are, etc. Also, printing will occur again in the future, which will catapult real assets and BTC. If you see clearly, you'll be one of the view who wins this next decade, even though most everyone loses, especially index and bond people last year, who got their asses handed to them.

I was wrong that Russia wouldn't invade at that time (Feb) when I posted. Ok. So what? Meant nothing, big picture, if you understand the reasons why they did. Most here don't. Again, I was wrong, but it didn't matter, like the above econ and markets predictions matters to people lives. If anything the invasion helped and will help what I'm recommending people buy and be in for the next 10+ years.

I've described precisely what's been going on with the corona scamdemic and the hurtful jabs. If you don't think that's huge, when someone like our founder has absolutely no clue about it, you are really dishonest. People have died from this, and will continue to. I can't think of anything MORE important on internet posting/predictions, than that.

Even though I won't get a thank you, you're welcome. If nothing else, I fight through censoring here to deliver the truth. Again, I'm hated for it. I know that it comes with the territory, so I'm happy to suffer foolishness for a single person to get the truth about things. Meanwhile, Bish is disliked, but not censored, voicing the propaganda of the true enemies of the world and its people. Think about that for at least 10 minutes before you respond, please.
by Cool Breeze
Thu Feb 09, 2023 11:41 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

Higgenbotham wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 11:04 am The price pattern in the S&P is potentially set up for a massive collapse, in my opinion.

I've said before that 4200 is a very important level, but that I did not think the market would be able to get over it. Due to that, I thought there might be a serious challenge of that level after it was approached and rejected on February 2. However, the bulls to date have not been able to muster a serious challenge, but 2 weak challenges instead that form a declining series of tops short term from February 2.

Also, I have a possible cycle turn date of February 9 (today). In a strong market it may have been a temporary move over 4200. Instead, it is a lower high, which I interpret as being very bearish. If the market rejects from this level with a fast down move, my interpretation is the market has a good chance of never being up here again.
Higgenbotham wrote: Wed Oct 19, 2022 8:29 pm 4200 and 3500 seem to me to be the important numbers the past 2 months. I'm not too interested in any levels besides those and their fibs. I'd be really surprised if the market could get over 4200 the rest of this year but wouldn't be surprised to see something over 4000.
Higgenbotham wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 10:42 pm It's still my guess that 4200 should cap this market and maybe 4000 will do it.
Yes. That last move was only 15 points down though.

I thought 4080-4100 was really the resistance line before, but it got back up ... however can't muster enough FOMO buying to get over 4200 as you state. I don't buy it either, at all, and the longer this goes on the higher the probability is for something breaking. Right now, it looks like March. Did they start the hiking last March? I think the beginning was an announcement on March 16 of last year that they'd increase 25 bp
by Higgenbotham
Thu Feb 09, 2023 11:04 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

The price pattern in the S&P is potentially set up for a massive collapse, in my opinion.

I've said before that 4200 is a very important level, but that I did not think the market would be able to get over it. Due to that, I thought there might be a serious challenge of that level after it was approached and rejected on February 2. However, the bulls to date have not been able to muster a serious challenge, but 2 weak challenges instead that form a declining series of tops short term from February 2.

Also, I have a possible cycle turn date of February 9 (today). In a strong market it may have been a temporary move over 4200. Instead, it is a lower high, which I interpret as being very bearish. If the market rejects from this level with a fast down move, my interpretation is the market has a good chance of never being up here again.
Higgenbotham wrote: Wed Oct 19, 2022 8:29 pm 4200 and 3500 seem to me to be the important numbers the past 2 months. I'm not too interested in any levels besides those and their fibs. I'd be really surprised if the market could get over 4200 the rest of this year but wouldn't be surprised to see something over 4000.
Higgenbotham wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 10:42 pm It's still my guess that 4200 should cap this market and maybe 4000 will do it.
by aeden
Wed Dec 07, 2022 3:21 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

Cool Breeze wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 10:10 am Looks like I nailed it. I don't mind another head fake bump up today, I'll just short some more. I don' think any buyers are coming to the rescue at this point, but I guess we'll see.
Agree the senate democrat control now will escalate a faster drawdown.

CEO of a company with a history of woke virtue signalling came running to Republicans asking for help in a merger deal that Democrats are seeking to block, Senator Tom Cotton hilariously responded “best of luck.”

Just add a simpe coppock curve also to trend analsys.
Hurst cycle in to M wave with a FIB trend check will keep you within the guard rails.
H and myself take more time on victoms of this FTX contagion.
As noted clearly that even a bot can spot is we will see what billion covers for the lie cheat steal democrat CULT.
Mad Maxine is running cover already for this criminal cult.
I remember when @kroger mandated the COVID jab. I now shop @meijer .

— SmallTownDude🇺🇸🇹🇼🇭🇰 (@Small_Town_Dude) December 6, 2022
As a dear friend of a Texas trucker who distributes inventory for Kroger, I hear plenty of stories about how Kroger management deals poorly with all of its employees.

Guess whats on the short menu.
by aeden
Tue Dec 06, 2022 12:26 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

off 100 ma is the current %target
https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inli ... k=e1zgdbIF
as noted book4 closed monday
hurst M cycle and H long count reference still valid

as we noted here out a day early book4 short
a day late you gave your money away
will monitor the break down to 100 ma dead cat move if/then
expect 2023 lost as insourcing buckets develope

protect the year as santa rally is your problem not those locked in

you could say the summation wave was dumb luck

yes no clue we locked in %gain

rinse and repeat as %gain went to bearx for 2023 for now

capex will be tight and yes we understand the chip act also

consumer is also wasting
by Cool Breeze
Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:49 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

Higgenbotham wrote: Sat Dec 03, 2022 3:46 am
Cool Breeze wrote: Fri Dec 02, 2022 11:37 am I don't get what timesymmetry guy is saying, except that his November panic thing was off (hard call, just saying). The "bear market low", does that suggest a blow off topic is coming? December is going to mark a low, moving higher, or that the next big low is coming after December?

I like Mac10's comment on Berg's tweet the best, that seems far more likely.
Timesymmetry was saying in August to expect a major bear market low on or about December 8. That was based on important bear market lows in April 1942, June 1962, August 1982 and October 2002. The lows 40 and 80 years back were very significant, and it is reasonable to think that the Fed tried to defeat that cycle. I can only guess what timesymmetry would say now, but it would probably be that the major low he predicted based on the 20 year, 2 month cycle is still coming. That seems to be his standard line of reasoning. At this point, it doesn't matter to me what he would say. Though I would say he is an excellent trader in his own right when he is on. He's not one of the 8 I follow at present because this environment is not conducive to his style at present.

My preferred reasoning is that on the pure 20 year cycle, going 20 years back, Greenspan was screwing somewhat with the cycles in that he was trying to prevent a huge Depression and he said so. But what Greenspan was doing was nowhere near the amount of distortion the Fed is currently engaging in to hold off this bear market. Therefore, rather than the move just above the October 2002 low that occurred in March 2003, I am expecting that the October 2022 low will break in the first quarter of 2023 and the bear market low will happen then, or at least there will be a significant and tradeable intermediate term low.
Yes, we are thinking the same way in general. I just think it'll move much lower in January-ish and then the "rallies" will continue to be lower highs, followed by lower lows. The idiots who think they are front running the Fed with the pivot have no idea how long it's going to be until they pivot. That sets up algo and retail panic time coming up. I don't see a pivot until at least June. They want to hurt the whole, fragile system. I'm out and shorting the russell in about 2 weeks or whenever I decide that the quick up here of some of these dumb buyers is done.
by Higgenbotham
Sat Dec 03, 2022 3:46 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

Cool Breeze wrote: Fri Dec 02, 2022 11:37 am I don't get what timesymmetry guy is saying, except that his November panic thing was off (hard call, just saying). The "bear market low", does that suggest a blow off topic is coming? December is going to mark a low, moving higher, or that the next big low is coming after December?

I like Mac10's comment on Berg's tweet the best, that seems far more likely.
Timesymmetry was saying in August to expect a major bear market low on or about December 8. That was based on important bear market lows in April 1942, June 1962, August 1982 and October 2002. The lows 40 and 80 years back were very significant, and it is reasonable to think that the Fed tried to defeat that cycle. I can only guess what timesymmetry would say now, but it would probably be that the major low he predicted based on the 20 year, 2 month cycle is still coming. That seems to be his standard line of reasoning. At this point, it doesn't matter to me what he would say. Though I would say he is an excellent trader in his own right when he is on. He's not one of the 8 I follow at present because this environment is not conducive to his style at present.

My preferred reasoning is that on the pure 20 year cycle, going 20 years back, Greenspan was screwing somewhat with the cycles in that he was trying to prevent a huge Depression and he said so. But what Greenspan was doing was nowhere near the amount of distortion the Fed is currently engaging in to hold off this bear market. Therefore, rather than the move just above the October 2002 low that occurred in March 2003, I am expecting that the October 2022 low will break in the first quarter of 2023 and the bear market low will happen then, or at least there will be a significant and tradeable intermediate term low.
by Cool Breeze
Fri Dec 02, 2022 11:37 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16846014

Re: Financial topics

Higgenbotham wrote: Thu Dec 01, 2022 9:14 pm This link has detail on the 20 year 2 month cycle. The August 20 post is the one to scroll down to.

https://www.timesymmetry.com/daily-comments.htm

...

This is another point of view:

https://twitter.com/BergMilton/status/1 ... 6135008256

I disagree that the down phase of a 90 year cycle can last just 6 months under any circumstances but that's what makes a market, I guess.
I don't get what timesymmetry guy is saying, except that his November panic thing was off (hard call, just saying). The "bear market low", does that suggest a blow off topic is coming? December is going to mark a low, moving higher, or that the next big low is coming after December?

I like Mac10's comment on Berg's tweet the best, that seems far more likely.