Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

Yes H it is.
We never discounted that premise.
Ukraine was the laundromat for the DNC.
https://www.amazon.com/Red-Mafiya-Russi ... 0316294748
Accuse your enemy of what you are doing.
They are not democrats. My wife very busy and conservative
states they crossed the threshold of evil.
The current schadenfreude to what we see is Biblical.

https://www.amazon.com/Gestapo-Chief-In ... WPRPK40D0M
The former Gestapo chief never thought that his private comments would be made public and he wrote about life in official Washington in plain, unvarnished words. The historical and political realities.

As we already knew here and yes noted: All of them knew that this was a fake from the very beginning, because this Guccifer 2.0 character was fabricating it. They were using him plus the Internet Research Agency [IRA] as “supposed trolls of the Russian government”. Well, when they sent their lawyers over to challenge that in a court of law, the government failed to prove they had any connection with the Russian government. They basically were chastised by the judge for fabricating a charge against this company.

To bad more Americans cannot see how far the Apple did not fall from the Tree with Vinmans Handlers also.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/for ... d-evidence

Yes we will Vote for Trump.

http://ponerology.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjMoAf9ld4I

Every option book has exposure to vol of vol (i.e. gamma of gamma or 4th moment)

Fixed income: bootstrapping/ Commodity: cost of carry

red dress allures and lighter fluid what not to like we jest

But they are our Morons

In the aftermath of the fallout from the DNC server internal release, the Democrats have been scrambling how to redirect public anger (especially among Bernie Sanders supporters) from the revelations that not only did the Democratic party try everything in its power to sabotage Bernie Sanders presidential bid, but also colluded with various "impartial" media outlets as well as breach fundraising rules in the process.
And, as of this morning, it appears that the solution they have decided upon is not to explain or even justify the scandalous actions, but to simply blame Russia for the hack.

Moments ago Hillary's campaign manager, Robby Mook, appeared on CNN and as David Axelrod pointed out, suggested that Russians are behind the DNC hacking. Wow, @HillaryClinton manager Mook goes full bore on @realDonaldTrump-Russia tie on @CNNSotu. Suggests Russians behind DNC hacking. — David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) July 24, 2016

Its not hard to alter LBA archives and any retard knows that.

=====================================================================

VIPS (ie Veteran Inteligence Professionals For Sanity).

These are a few of persons involved with VIPS they are not anonymous:

William Binney, former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center

Skip Folden, independent analyst, retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US (Associate VIPS)

Edward Loomis, Jr., former NSA Technical Director for the Office of Signals Processing

David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)

Kirk Wiebe, former Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA

So again, there's certainly every reason to not escalate hostility between the United States and Russia with many details still obfuscated and investigations incomplete.

There have been no forensic investigations of DNC's servers by the US government. FBI has deferred to a group by name of Cloudstrike to examine the servers. Cloudstrike was hired by DNC and it's co-founder Dimiti Alperovitch has ties to the Ukrainian government and is vehemently anti-Russian (conflict of interest?)

Italicized/bold text below was excerpted from the website http://www.consortiumnews.com a report titled:

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Full Disclosure: Over recent decades the ethos of our intelligence profession has eroded in the public mind to the point that agenda-free analysis is deemed well nigh impossible. Thus, we add this disclaimer, which applies to everything we in VIPS say and do: We have no political agenda; our sole purpose is to spread truth around and, when necessary, hold to account our former intelligence colleague

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/i ... -evidence/

Italicize d/bold text below was excerpted from the website http://www.zerohedge.com a report titled:

What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google

Recall that the FBI was denied access to the DNC servers by the DNC itself, and simply agreed to rely on the results provided by CrowdStrike, which as you can see has ties to all sorts of anti-Russia organizations and individuals. I find it absolutely remarkable that James Comey head of the FBI outsourced his job to CrowdStrike.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-2 ... ties-hilla ry-clinton-ukrainian-billionaire-and-g

We now have proven American (FBI, CIA, DIA), British, Australian, Italian and EU interference in the 2016 election.
Someone should tell the DOJ.

The extensive notes support the work of Robert Axelrod that posited AI bias to root payoff.
The flower portion is discarded as seasonal refuse.
The current ploys of signal error to profitability from the Foundation we discussed is only
the next step to Pavlov's observation of consequences they do not fathom.
The point is the actual true nature of it will overwhelm them and claiming to be a liberal
is a deflection to the actual usage of the concept.
What the talking points are is well understood as mutation to adaptive with the drivers
to change the system. You as myself understand the fuse was burning for some time.
This position of deception in the signal error of construct is for the obvious measures
of time they do not have since the consequences are clear.
Sismondi was clear and they also understood that from the Marxist camps.

thread: Dunoyer incorporated Sismondi's theory into the Sayardian conception of political economy in which men have to adapt
their behaviour to the nature of things, or suffer the consequences.

To the thinking today it was Sismondi's work picked apart in the so called French Café intellectual's purview age as the alleged agent's of change soundly ignored in the States until 1963.

Antonio Gramsci and George Lukacs carried the torch and created a strategy for destroying both Christian influence and the Western culture itself.
Instead of calling for a communist revolution, as they had in Russia, they decided they should seize political power last, after what they called "A Long March through the Institutions" of the West.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08- ... ed-america

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09- ... -oppressed

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-0 ... -suspended
Piece of paper not filled out and thoughts as in not caring being lost in the sign of the times while they walk in circles as the people watch
in sublime disbelieve of the fourth step.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

thread cnn flypaper

The top four floors owned by Sandman.

Rumors that the Vegas attack was actually a bungled assassination attempt on Prince Salman by Taleel himself. They claim that Paddock was actually a gun runner (makes sense as you CAN NOT beat Vegas on any consistent timescale, rather he was just using Vegas casinos to launder money). Apparently his room was right beneath Salman's, but when they attempted the assassination, they found the Prince was gone to another casino to play cards, and that the FBI was apparently already on the scene, knowing that there was a plot, but not necessarily knowing that it was an assassination attempt on Salman. Apparently they were cut off from leaving, and decided to fake a terror attack in order to create the chaos needed to escape. Similar with the attempt to blow up the fuel tanks at the airport. Supposedly the FBI covered up Saudi involvement because if this had come out, the public would likely have clamored for war with Saudi. Instead, they have the man responsible, and likely the whole cabal rounded up. tm

http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... 050#p36628

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the ‘high road’ and ‘confess’ with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, ‘just isn’t so.’ Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly ‘call for an end to the nonsense’ because you have already ‘done the right thing.’ Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for ‘coming clean’ and ‘owning up’ to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

Hillary’s e-mail server and the FBI/DOJ cover-up have caused a lot of damage, but there’s another “damage” nobody has even mentioned, yet…
In the Tradecraft, countries used to spend years trying to create fool-proof “legends” for their spies.
Remember the Russian chick, Anna Chapman, who was arrested in New York a few years back and sent back to Russia?
She was barely 19 when she left Russia for London. Soon, she got married, changed her last name, became the UK citizen, worked for Barclay’s, and in 2009 moved to New York.
Less than a year later, before even starting the actual spying, she was betrayed by a Russian “Aldrich Ames”.
Nowadays, everything is way simpler – no one cares about the “legend” anymore and here’s an example…
A Muslim family with a 2-year-old girl moves from the US to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
The father is a teacher/mullah at the local madrassa – the only form of the Wahhabi Sunni radical education allowed in Saudi Arabia.
By the way, all decapitations by ISIS and Saudi Arabia, under the Wahhabi Sharia Law, are just “mandatory sentencing”, but I digress…
The Girl grows up, goes back to the States, drops her burka, and goes to college (George Washington University in DC, one of the most expensive colleges in the US). She doesn’t qualify for Student Aid and her father-mullah doesn’t make enough money in SA to pay for it, but “someone” keeps paying all those bills, in cash!
Soon, with the helping hand of Bandar “28-pages” Bush, she goes interning at the White House and, soon after, is assigned to Hillary as an aide. That girl’s name, yeah – you’ve guessed it, is Huma Bin Laden… I mean… Abedin.
Huma’s family still lives in Jeddah, SA – the same city the San Bernardino’s burka-wearing-female-shooter came from.
Huma is a Saudi spy with full access to all of our Top Secrets, but no one seems to care!
We, as a country, have been whipped by the Saudis for a very long time. Nobody in the government, left or right, dares to say anything about Saudi Arabia. It took more than 3 presidential terms to just publish the freaking 28 pages, for goat’s sake!
Even if there wasn’t enough evidence to prosecute Huma for spying, her being THAT close to the Clinton’s and still having her family living in Saudi Arabia makes her utterly COMPROMISED! I think? Looney

But they are our Morons

In the aftermath of the fallout from the DNC server hack, the Democrats have been scrambling how to redirect public anger (especially among Bernie Sanders supporters) from the revelations that not only did the Democratic party try everything in its power to sabotage Bernie Sanders presidential bid, but also colluded with various "impartial" media outlets as well as breach fundraising rules in the process.
And, as of this morning, it appears that the solution they have decided upon is not to explain or even justify the scandalous actions, but to simply blame Russia for the hack.

Moments ago Hillary's campaign manager, Robby Mook, appeared on CNN and as David Axelrod pointed out, suggested that Russians are behind the DNC hacking.
Wow, @HillaryClinton manager Mook goes full bore on @realDonaldTrump-Russia tie on @CNNSotu. Suggests Russians behind DNC hacking.
— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) July 24, 2016

This is specifically what he said (highlights ours):
"What is disturbing to us is that experts are telling us that Russians broke into the DNC, stole these emails and other experts are now saying that the Russians are now releasing these emails for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump. I don't think it's coincidental that these emails were released on the eve of our convention here and that's disturbing."
The clip in question:
Clinton campaign manager on DNC leak: Experts say "Russians are releasing these emails" to help Trump #CNNSOTU https://t.co/GwJhloosPs
— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) July 24, 2016

Ah yes, the old "Russians are helping Donald Trump" strawman, as confirmed by "experts." The same Donald Trump who the media lambasted in November of last year that he had never actually met Vladimir Putin during a 60 Minutes episode, as he had previously claimed.
Oddly, Mook found nothing "disturbing" about the revelations that Hillary was the DNC's chosen candidate from the start, or the allegations that there was unethical collusion with the media, or that the DNC may have broken fundraising rules to boost Hillary's campaign.
Nothing disturbing about that. What is far more disturbing is that "the Russians" hacked the DNC's server. Perhaps by that logic it is also disturbing that "the Russians" also hacked Hillary's own email server. Of course, they would never be able to hack a personal, home server with no outside protection; but instead it was child's play to penetrate the official, firewalled server of the entire Democratic organization.

Except... there is a problem with this "disturbing", if very amusing, tangent.

As The Hill reported, it wasn't some mysterious, Kremlin-based hacker/operator that provided the emails to Wikileaks. It was the Romanian hacker Guccifer 2.0 (not to be confused with the original Romanian hacker Guccifer, aka Marcel Lazar, who is currently in US custody and whose email revelations over a year ago unleashed the scandal involving Hillary's email server in the first place), well-known for previously leaked hundreds of internal DNC memos on his own website.

It is the same Guccifer 2.0 who, following allegations that he was working for Russia, conducted the following interview with Motherboard where he said the following:

Motherboard: So, first of all, what can you tell me about yourself? Who are you?
Guccifer 2.0: i'm a hacker, manager, philosopher, women lover. I also like Gucci! I bring the light to people. I'm a freedom fighter! So u can choose what u like!
And where are you from?
From Romania.

Do you work with Russia or the Russian government?
No because I don't like Russians and their foreign policy. I hate being attributed to Russia.

Why?
I've already told! Also I made a big deal, why you glorify them?

Tell me about the DNC hack. How did you get in?
I hacked that server through the NGP VAN soft, if u understand what I'm talking about.

So that was your entry point, what happened next?
I used 0-day exploit of NGP VAN soft then I installed shell-code into the DNC server. it allowed me to intrude into DNC network. They have Windows-based domain architecture. then I installed my Trojans on several PCs. I had to go from one PC to another every week so CrowdStrike couldn't catch me for a long time. I know that they have cool intrusion detection system. But my heuristic algorithms are better.

When did you first hack them?
Last summer.
And when did you get kicked out?
June 12, when they rebooted their system.

And why did you hack the DNC in the first place?
DNC isn't my first deal.

Who else have you hacked?
Follow my blog and u'll know! I can't tell u now about all my deals. My safety depends on it.
OK, I understand. But why did u target DNC? why are you interested in them?
Lazar began this deal and I follow him! I think we must fight for freedom of minds, fight for the world without Illuminati

Lazar?
Marcel Laz?r [The original Gufficer]
The interview then continued in Romanian to prove that the alleged hacker indeed spoke the language.
Needless to say, it is a stretch to attribute the actions of a lone, copycat hacker, who "hates" being attributed to Russia and who doesn't like "Russians and their foreign policy."
As for Trump being a secret plant for the KGB, one can make a far more "disturbing" assertion that it is Clinton, not Trump, who is in the Russians' pocket. As the WSJ recalled in late 2015, it was Clinton, not Trump, that was paid $500,000 to make Russian problems go away:
The Russian government was opposed to sanctions. At the time, the Obama administration was attempting to reset relations with Russia. The State Department rebuffed the request from Congress. “We…do not support such a measure at this time,” a department official wrote to one senator.
A few weeks later, Bill Clinton participated in a question-and-answer session at a Renaissance Capital investors conference. He was paid $500,000. After the appearance, Mr. Clinton received a personal thank-you call from Vladimir Putin, then the Russian prime minister, the government news agency TASS reported.
Renaissance Capital is one of Russia's largest investment banks.
We wonder if the press (at least those who do not need DNC pre-clearance what to write about as "per the agreement") will inquire about the factual transcript of what Bill Clinton said, that he got a "personal thank you" from Putin in 2010? We doubt it - far more likely is that instead of focusing on the real implications of the DNC hacking scandal, namely the corruption and collusion revealed inside the Democratic party, a far more important "story" will be what is emerging as a "vast left-wing conspiracy", namely how Putin will annex the US if and when Trump, who "experts" will soon elevate to status of KGB spy to spike the narrative, becomes president.
Because that is what - according to experts - is what is truly "disturbing"

yellowcake http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... ellow+cake

search.php?keywords=axelrod&t=2&sf=msgonly

red diapers:
Several times I’ve written for The American Spectator on the person of David Axelrod, the figure most responsible for giving America two terms of Barack Obama. My first piece was a cover feature for the March 2012 print edition, titled, “David Axelrod, Lefty Lumberjack.” This lengthy profile was followed by an August 2012 piece titled, “All in the (Political) Family.” Then followed still more writings on Axelrod and friends, particularly the new material I reported in my book on Obama’s communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. David Axelrod

These writings got a lot of attention. I discussed the topic a number of times in interviews. People were shocked, and they wanted more. What other skeletons lay in David Axelrod’s political-ideological closet?

I dug into all of the declassified archival documents and old Congressional investigative reports at my disposal. But even then, what I could find was limited by what Axelrod would divulge, and because liberal “journalists” who had profiled Axelrod’s background never dared to raise any red flags from the past of our president’s chief image-maker. Like Obama himself, Obama’s molder and shaper had to be protected by liberal “journalists.”
One crucial opening amid the Axelrod roadblocks came with the death of Axelrod’s mother a little over a year ago, which led to the funeral home posting a bio that finally resolved the remarkably elusive question of the names of her parents and grandparents and other strangely absent information. I reported on this in an April 2014 piece for The American Spectator, titled, “The Quest for David Axelrod’s Leftist Roots.”
Well, now comes another open window: the publication of Axelrod’s memoirs, titled, Believer: My Forty Years in Politics, which contain some things I totally did not expect, namely in the person of Axelrod’s father. Those things prompt me now to write this article.
Before getting to the new things in Believer, here’s a brief summary of what I’ve previously reported on Axelrod’s upbringing:

David Axelrod was born and raised in New York in February 1955 before moving to Chicago in the 1970s to attend college and begin a professional path that would take him into journalism, political campaigns, and eventually the bosom of Barack Hussein Obama. In a very interesting twist of fate in Chicago, Axelrod (like Obama) had his own mentors there — namely, in the Canter family.

The Canters were old hardline pro-Soviet communists, so much so that the senior Canter, Harry Jacob Canter, was actually brought to Moscow during the height of the Stalin period to work for the Soviet government as an official translator of Lenin’s writings. Harry was active in the old Industrial Workers of the World and had been secretary of the Boston Communist Party. He was not shy about his political enthusiasm. In 1930, he ran for governor of Massachusetts on the Communist Party ticket. After that, he sojourned to the Motherland, taking his entire family to Moscow with him, including his son David, who one day would come know David Axelrod.

The Canter family returned to America (Chicago, where the Communist Party was founded in 1919) in the 1940s. In an amazing irony, the Canters actually knew and worked with Obama’s old communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. I even found the Canter names in Davis’s communist newspaper, The Chicago Star. Remarkably, one of the Canters was on the board of a group called the Progressive Publishing Co., which purchased the Star from Davis in 1948, helping grease the skids for Davis’s departure for Hawaii, where he would eventually meet a young Obama.

(For the record, as I’ve noted separately, Davis — again, Obama’s mentor — also knew and worked with Valerie Jarrett’s grandfather and father-in-law in Communist Party/left-wing circles in Chicago in the 1940s.)
The Canter family member who knew David Axelrod best was David Canter. He and another old communist maneuverer from Chicago named Don Rose would mentor David Axelrod and help him secure his first major newspaper jobs at the Hyde Park Herald and then the Chicago Tribune. Axelrod is the first to admit that those jobs launched him.
David Canter and Don Rose did lots of far-left work throughout the 1960s and into the 1970s, associating with all sorts of radical organizations and suspected communist front groups. Rose was so important to Axelrod that even liberal journalists who have profiled Axelrod cannot and do not ignore noting that Rose was a mentor, minus (of course) any inconvenient details about communism.

In short, the Canters and Don Rose were instrumental influences outside of David Axelrod’s family. As for Axelrod’s family, the political-ideological story centers around his mother, Myril, and his father, Joseph.

Politically and ideologically speaking, there has always been more information available on Axelrod’s mother than his father. Myril in the 1940s worked for a prominent left-wing New York daily, PM. The publication was a battleground between non-communist liberals/progressives and closet communists who masqueraded as liberals/progressives. It was heavily penetrated by Communist Party USA members literally sworn to Stalin’s Soviet Union and the Moscow line. The self-proclaimed “liberals/progressives” at PM ranged from Arthur Miller to I. F. Stone, both of whom, we now know, had been communists in the 1930s and perhaps into the 1940s. The famed Arthur Miller was at least a small “c” communist who — as shown by Congress in the 1950s — had applied to join the Communist Party. Miller (we now know) wrote for the Daily Worker and New Masses under pseudonyms. As for Stone, he had been a literal Soviet spy in the late 1930s, though he later came to reject the USSR and became a non-communist leftist of some sort.

Where were Myril’s sympathies? Though I still cannot say with absolute certainly, we did learn only after her death, in her candid obituary posted at the funeral home’s website, that she worked not only as a reporter for PM but as a personal assistant to I. F. Stone on one of his major books on Palestine.
I still don’t know how far to the left Myril stood. I have never encountered any evidence that she was a member of the Communist Party. She was clearly on the left, and no doubt to the left of a Truman-Kennedy Democrat, but how far exactly remains a mystery.
As for David Axelrod’s father, Joseph, he has been portrayed in all of the profiles of David as a lovable, happy-go-lucky psychiatrist who loved baseball, with nary a political bone in his body. I’ve always been skeptical of that, because I know that liberal “journalists” do what they can not to present damning information on the people they need to protect. Nonetheless, I could never find anything of substance on the politics of David’s father.

All of which brings me to David’s new book.

In Believer, you will not find a word from David Axelrod on the Canter family. No surprise. You will find a few words about Don Rose, who Axelrod twice refers to as his “mentor,” but you will not get even a whiff of a suggestion of Rose’s radical politics, let alone the “c” word. Rose is portrayed as a merry progressive fighting for the civil rights of minorities.

As for David’s mom, he mentions PM and even her work for I. F. Stone, but again, the “c” word appears nowhere. In fact — with one curious exception, as we’ll see below — I couldn’t find the word “communist,” let alone “Stalinist,” anywhere in the book. I learned nothing new about Myril Axelrod or her politics in David’s memoirs. David claimed that his mother “wasn’t an ideologue,” but who knows what that means.
But what really surprised me — and prompts this article — is what David divulged about his father’s political affiliation, though he attempted to do so in a light-hearted, dismissive way:
Joseph Axelrod’s family fled Russia along with other Jews during one of the periods of czarist persecution early in the 20th century. (David’s mother’s family were also Jewish immigrants from Russia.) They first landed in Montreal but ended up in the Bronx about the time that Joseph turned 12 years old (circa 1931).

Joseph enrolled in college at John Dewey’s Columbia University, always the most radical college in America, which has easily processed more members of the Communist Party, sympathizers, and even agents than any academic institution. Though David doesn’t given dates, I estimate that Joseph was at Columbia shortly after or around the time that the university turned Thomas Merton and Bella Dodd into communists, and just as one of its earlier graduates, Whittaker Chambers, was spying for the Soviet Union. This would have been around the time Elizabeth Bentley got to Columbia and turned into a communist en route to becoming a Soviet spy, and not long after Margaret Mead got there and turned hard left. Joseph studied philosophy there, where he surely would have encountered the odious Corliss Lamont, one of the worst pro-Marxist dupes of the 20th century, who was there teaching “philosophy” with Professor Dewey and their comrades.

Needless to say, David Axelrod doesn’t get into any of this. He merely says that his father “studied philosophy for a time at Columbia University.”

But then comes a striking item volunteered by David. In the next line, he writes: “In keeping with his bohemian lifestyle, when Dad registered to vote at the height of the Depression, he listed his party affiliation as ‘Communist.’”
Whoa? Really? What’s up with that?
We always had communist suspicions regarding David’s mother, but never his father. The dad was reportedly the non-political one. The mom was the big lefty. Now we’re suddenly cracking open David’s memoirs, thinking we might find information on the politics of the mom, only to learn that the old man was a Red?
This is apparently something that David felt he needed to get out in the open, and dismiss. He tells us in the next sentence, “Years later, when a friend used my dad as a reference for a promotion in the military, Dad’s youthful act of defiance came up.”
I’m sure it did. This tantalizing item must be listed on paper somewhere, apparently prompting David to feel the need to report it before someone found it someday. But David just as quickly, in the very next line, laughs it off, quoting his dad:
“They figured if I had really been a member of the Communist Party, I would have registered as a Republican, to throw everyone off the scent,” my dad told me, recounting the drama. And of course, they were right. Dad wasn’t much of a joiner, unless you count baseball teams.
There you go: back to baseball, out of the communist orbit. With that, David provides no other details. He raises the issue and then shrugs it off with a laugh — thus signaling that any conservative who dares to raise the issue will be at best a laughable buffoon and at worst (more likely, of course) an ugly, vile McCarthyite with no shame, one who vulgarly sees a red under every bed, one chasing down poor David’s father with torches.
Nonetheless, I find this eye-opening. To be sure, it’s limited in what we can take away. An emailer who read the book before I did wrote me excitably announcing that Axelrod’s memoir reveals that his father was “a member of the Communist Party.” No, the memoir does not say that. It says his father once listed “Communist” as his party affiliation but later suggested to his son that he had not been a party member.
David would thus say that we can’t say that his dad was a communist. And indeed, where’s the proof? Well, there’s maybe this hard copy, printed military reference somewhere, but David has just pulled the carpet out from under it — at least to the satisfaction of liberals, who are convinced that America is teeming with hundreds of millions of unregenerate racists and “homophobes” but no communist ever once tread this country’s soil. David’s dismissal will be more than enough for liberals’ complete satisfaction.
The reality is that confirming these things is highly elusive. Finding Communist Party registration rolls is extremely difficult. That said, some such material exists and is scattered and out there. If anyone reading this has access to Communist Party material or registration rolls from the Bronx district in the latter 1930s, take a look for a “Joseph Axelrod.”
Finally, politics aside, I would be callous not to note that David Axelrod’s words on his father in his memoir are quite moving. He offers a gripping, tragic account of his father’s suicide in the spring of 1974 while David was in Chicago. His father hung himself at his New York studio apartment. David was, of course, shocked. “There was no one I loved more,” he wrote. “I hoped he knew that.” It was a very sad end.
It certainly was. One cannot help but be touched by this.
As for the focus here in this piece — the politics — how political was the father? How ideological was he? I grudgingly accepted for a while the narrative that his father was apolitical, but how can I still accept that? I know now that Joseph Axelrod once listed himself as a registered communist. Who does that? My dad never did that. Did yours?
This tells us something — at the very least, something.
In all, we are left with David Axelrod, the man who gave us our first Red-Diaper Baby President, with an upbringing that might have a few red diapers of its own. And as I’ve said often, if you think such backgrounds are totally irrelevant, you’re lying to yourself. No, it doesn’t make Axelrod a secret member of Communist Party USA, or Barack Obama the Manchurian Candidate, but these radical-left pasts had an impact that should never be casually dismissed.
Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College, executive director of The Center for Vision & Values, and New York Times best-selling author of the book, “The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.” His other books include “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism” and “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century.” The original article was posted at American Spectator.

TOPICS: Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: New York
KEYWORDS: chicago; davidaxelrod; obama

I was a democrat long ago and no sane soul should be.

Tribe served as a law clerk to Mathew Tobriner on the California Supreme Court from 1966–67 and as a law clerk to Potter Stewart of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1967–68. He joined the Harvard Law School faculty as an assistant professor in 1968, receiving tenure in 1972. Among his law students and research assistants while on the faculty at Harvard have been President Barack Obama (a research assistant for two years), Chief Justice John Roberts (as a law student in his classes), US Senator Ted Cruz, Chief Judge and Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan (as a research assistant).
Tribe was born in Shanghai, China, the son of Paulina (née Diatlovitsky) and George Israel Tribe. His family was Jewish. His father was from Poland and his mother was born in Harbin, to immigrants from Eastern Europe. He was raised in the French Concession of Shanghai. Tribe attended Abraham Lincoln High School, San Francisco, California. He holds an A.B. in mathematics, summa cum laude from Harvard College (1962), and a J.D., magna cum laude from Harvard Law School (1966), where he was a member of the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau.

The next rendition of a copy of a copy of a copy is being be released upon us.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama ... le/2631266

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-des ... e-sell-out
The answer is yes to socialize the base and capitalize the one percent of the one percent so stop being dullards.
The case for reform is simple, Tribe says. Our country is dedicated to the idea that people who are accused are innocent until proven guilty and deserve a defense.....

Unless they wish to sell body parts out of the birth canal and bill the center of the spectrum called the taxpayers
and commoditize lymphocytes and research tissue from slaughter.

His peers understand clearly money is another god to his bent knee he serves and they forward that Prof. Tribe forfeited any claim he might have had to be a constitutional authority, pre-eminent or otherwise. He is now no more than Mr. Maxine Waters, Professor of Political Expediency.

As we are the democrat red diaper Arabian clean up project as the rus cult meme wears thin and out.

Artemidorus consigns his note to the bottom.

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

Of course, if you ignore that fake Trump 'dossier' that was leaked by DC insiders, and that time acting Attorney General Sally Yates completely defied the new administration based on her own personal political agenda, and all of the damaging intelligence leaks to the media, including transcripts of Trump's calls from the Oval Office, not to mention those wiretapping claims regarding Trump Tower, then we're not really sure what Kelly is talking about....just some crazy alt-right conspiracy theory stuff probably...
"Rep. Kelly delivered his remarks at a private meeting to an audience of fellow Republicans. He was sharing the frustration of everyone in the room over how they believe certain Obama administration holdovers within the federal bureaucracy are attempting to upset President Trump's agenda." t

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... in-office/

Bettylu Saltzman, the only daughter of the super-Tribalist Philip Klutznick, had Rahm Israel Emanuel and David Axelrod train and produce the Obama product. Ayers, the SDS terrorist, and his Jewish wife Bernadine Dohrn, true name Ohrnstein, wrote the "auto-biography" of Obama as well. As Abner Mikva said about Obama, "he is the first Jewish president"
Soros backed Trump son-in-law, Jared Kushner, in real estate venture with $250 million
Kushner is a DEEP agent within the Trump family.

Axelrod On Clinton, TPP: Clinton's Biggest Liability Is "The Sense That She's Inauthentic"
http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... rod#p33880

Tribe was born in Shanghai, China, the son of Paulina (née Diatlovitsky) and George Israel Tribe. Tribe served as a law clerk to Mathew Tobriner on the California Supreme Court from 1966–67 and as a law clerk to Potter Stewart of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1967–68. He joined the Harvard Law School faculty as an assistant professor in 1968, receiving tenure in 1972. Among his law students and research assistants while on the faculty at Harvard have been President Barack Obama (a research assistant for two years),
search.php?keywords=smirky&t=2&sf=msgonly
Chief Justice John Roberts (as a law student in his classes), US Senator Ted Cruz, Chief Judge and Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan (as a research assistant).

To start also, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.
Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.

I'm convinced we are living a savage drama red diaper cartoon.
search.php?keywords=axelrod&t=2&sf=msgonly

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Mooney_Kirk
https://www.scribd.com/document/3375356 ... ting-Trump impossible to stack shit this high since the eco chamber had to eat it. page 17 inclusively

4chan will never support dems meme and all the red pills have to do is not look as simply factional stupid and vapid brains in economically evil as they have done before. Example, Ford insults other truck company's as they need participation trophy's. Does that mean that Ford did not get any money from the government? Hardly. Congress decided that the best alternative for Ford was to get funds from the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which is a government program for auto, student, and other consumer loans. These were very low-cost government loans to the tune of $5.9 billion that helped Ford tip-toe past bankruptcy and overhaul their factories to bring out more fuel-efficient technology.

One and all it insulted taxpayers who had to pay for bailouts and no bids in Sandlandastans debauchery's. This puts a point in the facts that Millar noted about in the Orontes region before.

As Millar indeed noted in "The Roman Near East" after many days of travel the Legati "Legion Command" after being briefed by the Legatus "Importance "Senate" Preafecti "Appointed" and lower administrative notices I left out for simplicity it was then all but over since a knock on the city gate ensued. Present the offenders bound by sunrise, or all that breathes shall cease to exist. Need less to say in that circumstance they where delivered bound to be Judged. I guess the Lixae "camp followers" where the ones who got paid for services rendered. We all know the conditions of the Lixae.

For the usually slow left hypocrites I suggest a safe space is being presented-maintained to those who still are breathing, given at this point they sure as hell deserve it and true support. The Office owns it now and those who serve in it will be sorted effectively. He may be a hard ass but the swamp needs more than the ass kicking also it deserves.

http://www.hri.org/docs/bryce/bryce.htm

We have just picked up fifteen babies. Three are already dead. They were terribly thin and ailing when we found them. Ah! If we could only write all that we see." -- Extract from a letter dated Marash 4th June, 1915, published in "Sonnenaufgang," September,1915.

To do nothing is the crime. The Office has our support in this season of despair.

Unlike some, I wanted Obama to succeed and his "black" people in positions of power to do good early on. To prove to their doubters that African Americans are different from all the statist bastards who came before them. What transpired is more of the same AND worse. Much, much worse. Incompetence in fiscal policies beyond anyone's imagination - 8 trillion dollars worth, lies, tyranny and warmongering worse than Bush to my disbelief, all smothered in the blanket of smooth platitudes and the injustice of labelling anyone who criticized his administration as racists.
What I have found instead in them is the disgusting amalgamation of establishment Zionist thieving bloodthirsty credo mixed with the compulsive infantile lying that is found in 7yr old kids who deny they ate the cake with chocolate smeared around their mouths. They have been an unmitigated disaster, following in the footsteps of Zimbabwean dictators and South African "democracy". What a chance they have wasted in America. The political "outsider" people longed for 8 yrs ago turned out to be the insider wrapped in the facade of bullshit to anyone with eyes.
The narrative is, their suffering under slavery (Or to put it more precisely, the vicarious suffering by proxy of those who were slaves 152 yrs ago) makes them more humane, more wise and worldly. The apparent reality is that in the cases of those who have climbed the ladders of power, it has made them more cunning, more deceitful, more akin to the slave masters than their own ancestors. More cruel, more violent, more greedy, more propagandist more delusional and certainly more evil. It is so disappointing. Perhaps any other race would be equally bad and the nature of power is that corrupts, but the sheer enormity of crimes against the American people and the world by the Obama gang are surely unmatched. I cannot believe he would have the gall to try it again, but then again, I think half the population have the memory retention of goldfish, beguiled by MSM lies 24/7 so he has a good chance  to come back. t

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content ... BIfile.pdf
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/ ... ts-family/

The Canters were old hardline pro-Soviet communists, so much so that the senior Canter, Harry Jacob Canter, was actually brought to Moscow during the height of the Stalin period to work for the Soviet government as an official translator of Lenin’s writings. Harry was active in the old Industrial Workers of the World and had been secretary of the Boston Communist Party. He was not shy about his political enthusiasm. In 1930, he ran for governor of Massachusetts on the Communist Party ticket. After that, he sojourned to the Motherland, taking his entire family to Moscow with him, including his son David, who one day would come know David Axelrod.

The Canter family returned to America (Chicago, where the Communist Party was founded in 1919) in the 1940s. In an amazing irony, the Canters actually knew and worked with Obama’s old communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. I even found the Canter names in Davis’s communist newspaper, The Chicago Star. Remarkably, one of the Canters was on the board of a group called the Progressive Publishing Co., which purchased the Star from Davis in 1948, helping grease the skids for Davis’s departure for Hawaii, where he would eventually meet a young Obama.

(For the record, as I’ve noted separately, Davis — again, Obama’s mentor — also knew and worked with Valerie Jarrett’s grandfather and father-in-law in Communist Party/left-wing circles in Chicago in the 1940s.)
http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content ... BIfile.pdf

The Canter family member who knew David Axelrod best was David Canter. He and another old communist maneuverer from Chicago named Don Rose would mentor David Axelrod and help him secure his first major newspaper jobs at the Hyde Park Herald and then the Chicago Tribune. Axelrod is the first to admit that those jobs launched him.
David Canter and Don Rose did lots of far-left work throughout the 1960s and into the 1970s, associating with all sorts of radical organizations and suspected communist front groups.

The question they still stumble over is whether Democrats have any priorities other than denying power to the left.

self`-liq′uidating asset adj. isis
1. able to be converted into cash quickly. check
2. (esp. of a property) producing income that repays the cost.
3. drumph cuts its funding since chaos theory states Turbulence ensures that two adjacent points in a complex system will eventually
end up in very different positions after some time has elapsed.

jared perez axelrod muslim brotherhood

A stated before precisely aimed darts to assail the enemy. Time and later from the wall....

As if a man did flee from a lion, and a bear met him; or went into the house and leaned his hand on the wall, and a serpent bit him.

As if. They should go from one evil to another.

When God makes a day dark, all the world cannot make it light. Those who are not reformed by the judgments of God, will be pursued by them; if they escape one, another stands ready to seize them. A pretence of piety is double iniquity, and so it will be found

thread: For those who think the EU is just a collection of coincidences such as it is a coincidence that it takes 28,000 words of legislation for one to sell a simple Cabbage – then – good luck – you will need it. For those of us like myself who are of the educated opinion the EU is a Banker/Corporation conspiracy to drive the middle class to extinction and have a new serfdom in Europe – then you will well understand – today it is the Beta test known as Palestine/Israel where the people are organ harvested and treated like sheep.

http://www.volokh.com/posts/1249677415.shtml

Since August 7, 2009 at 4:36pm facts indicate "they open mouth and nothing will ever be true" again.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... tikas.html

We only ponder the Masters true will to the mid terms, as they are carted to the political body farm.


Axelrod On Clinton, TPP: Clinton's Biggest Liability Is "The Sense That She's Inauthentic"

Tribe was born in Shanghai, China, the son of Paulina (née Diatlovitsky) and George Israel Tribe. His family was Jewish.
Tribe served as a law clerk to Mathew Tobriner on the California Supreme Court from 1966–67 and as a law clerk to Potter Stewart of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1967–68. He joined the Harvard Law School faculty as an assistant professor in 1968, receiving tenure in 1972. Among his law students and research assistants while on the faculty at Harvard have been President Barack Obama (a research assistant for two years),
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly
Chief Justice John Roberts (as a law student in his classes), US Senator Ted Cruz, Chief Judge and Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan (as a research assistant).

To start also, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.
Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.

I'm convinced we are living a savage drama red diaper cartoon.
http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

http://articles.extension.org/pages/112 ... -fire-ants Know the difference as they assault the legal system by design.

In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when "the rest of society is afraid of them," Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would "the rest of society" accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven's early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. "Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1971 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
Migrants are the 5th column to bring Western civilization to its knees and all know it.

When America would not let grandfather legally in a century ago since he was white western European, the Canadians did as a legal immigrant
and then later about 5 years or so he came to the States. During that time he went back to Europe as he saved money to get my grandmother out since the climate was already toxic and He feared what was to be. Many died, grandmother was orphaned. He went back for Her.

The labour wars lasted 4 years. In 1922, when the company introduced a one-third reduction in wages, the coal miners responded by restricting output at the pits and reducing production by one-third.

In the end the British Empire Steel Corp was chastised by a royal commission in 1926 for its unenlightened labour policies and subsequently collapsed into bankruptcy.

Coal shortened his life to be blunt as we know and knew that also. In the States he applied his carpenter skills from European apprenticeships.

The Emergency Quota Act, also known as the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921, the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, the Per Centum Law, and the Johnson Quota Act (ch. 8, 42 Stat. 5 of May 19, 1921) restricted immigration into the United States. Although intended as temporary legislation, the Act "proved in the long run the most important turning-point in American immigration policy" because it added two new features to American immigration law: numerical limits on immigration and the use of a quota system for establishing those limits. These limits came to be known as the National Origins Formula.

These asshole know nothing of suffering loss or faith as they that seen. Many perished in the Bankers wars.
Where the vultures circle we are warned. To his name alone we credit all.
The seven sided stone was relayed.

This is what the Lord Almighty says, administer true justice, show mercy and compassion to one another. Do not oppress the widow, or the fatherless, the alien, or the poor. In your hearts do not think evil of one another.

Zech.7:11-14 "But they refused to pay attention" (Is.9:10 the bricks have fallen, but we will build with dressed stones.)

As he knew from the book of Job that was seen. https://www.loc.gov/item/today-in-history/may-24

Hillary’s e-mail server and the FBI/DOJ cover-up have caused a lot of damage, but there’s another “damage” nobody has even mentioned, yet…
In the Tradecraft, countries used to spend years trying to create fool-proof “legends” for their spies.
Remember the Russian chick, Anna Chapman, who was arrested in New York a few years back and sent back to Russia?
She was barely 19 when she left Russia for London. Soon, she got married, changed her last name, became the UK citizen, worked for Barclay’s, and in 2009 moved to New York.
Less than a year later, before even starting the actual spying, she was betrayed by a Russian “Aldrich Ames”.
Nowadays, everything is way simpler – no one cares about the “legend” anymore and here’s an example…
A Muslim family with a 2-year-old girl moves from the US to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
The father is a teacher/mullah at the local madrassa – the only form of the Wahhabi Sunni radical education allowed in Saudi Arabia.
By the way, all decapitations by ISIS and Saudi Arabia, under the Wahhabi Sharia Law, are just “mandatory sentencing”, but I digress…
The Girl grows up, goes back to the States, drops her burka, and goes to college (George Washington University in DC, one of the most expensive colleges in the US). She doesn’t qualify for Student Aid and her father-mullah doesn’t make enough money in SA to pay for it, but “someone” keeps paying all those bills, in cash!
Soon, with the helping hand of Bandar “28-pages” Bush, she goes interning at the White House and, soon after, is assigned to Hillary as an aide. That girl’s name, yeah – you’ve guessed it, is Huma Bin Laden… I mean… Abedin.
Huma’s family still lives in Jeddah, SA – the same city the San Bernardino’s burka-wearing-female-shooter came from.
Huma is a Saudi spy with full access to all of our Top Secrets, but no one seems to care!
We, as a country, have been whipped by the Saudis for a very long time. Nobody in the government, left or right, dares to say anything about Saudi Arabia. It took more than 3 presidential terms to just publish the freaking 28 pages, for goat’s sake!
Even if there wasn’t enough evidence to prosecute Huma for spying, her being THAT close to the Clinton’s and still having her family living in Saudi Arabia makes her utterly COMPROMISED! I think? Looney

But they are our Morons

In the aftermath of the fallout from the DNC server hack, the Democrats have been scrambling how to redirect public anger (especially among Bernie Sanders supporters) from the revelations that not only did the Democratic party try everything in its power to sabotage Bernie Sanders presidential bid, but also colluded with various "impartial" media outlets as well as breach fundraising rules in the process.
And, as of this morning, it appears that the solution they have decided upon is not to explain or even justify the scandalous actions, but to simply blame Russia for the hack.

Moments ago Hillary's campaign manager, Robby Mook, appeared on CNN and as David Axelrod pointed out, suggested that Russians are behind the DNC hacking.
Wow, @HillaryClinton manager Mook goes full bore on @realDonaldTrump-Russia tie on @CNNSotu. Suggests Russians behind DNC hacking.
— David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) July 24, 2016


This is specifically what he said (highlights ours):
"What is disturbing to us is that experts are telling us that Russians broke into the DNC, stole these emails and other experts are now saying that the Russians are now releasing these emails for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump. I don't think it's coincidental that these emails were released on the eve of our convention here and that's disturbing."
The clip in question:
Clinton campaign manager on DNC leak: Experts say "Russians are releasing these emails" to help Trump #CNNSOTU https://t.co/GwJhloosPs
— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) July 24, 2016

Ah yes, the old "Russians are helping Donald Trump" strawman, as confirmed by "experts." The same Donald Trump who the media lambasted in November of last year that he had never actually met Vladimir Putin during a 60 Minutes episode, as he had previously claimed.
Oddly, Mook found nothing "disturbing" about the revelations that Hillary was the DNC's chosen candidate from the start, or the allegations that there was unethical collusion with the media, or that the DNC may have broken fundraising rules to boost Hillary's campaign.
Nothing disturbing about that. What is far more disturbing is that "the Russians" hacked the DNC's server. Perhaps by that logic it is also disturbing that "the Russians" also hacked Hillary's own email server. Of course, they would never be able to hack a personal, home server with no outside protection; but instead it was child's play to penetrate the official, firewalled server of the entire Democratic organization.

Except... there is a problem with this "disturbing", if very amusing, tangent.

As The Hill reported, it wasn't some mysterious, Kremlin-based hacker/operator that provided the emails to Wikileaks. It was the Romanian hacker Guccifer 2.0 (not to be confused with the original Romanian hacker Guccifer, aka Marcel Lazar, who is currently in US custody and whose email revelations over a year ago unleashed the scandal involving Hillary's email server in the first place), well-known for previously leaked hundreds of internal DNC memos on his own website.

It is the same Guccifer 2.0 who, following allegations that he was working for Russia, conducted the following interview with Motherboard where he said the following:

Motherboard: So, first of all, what can you tell me about yourself? Who are you?
Guccifer 2.0: i'm a hacker, manager, philosopher, women lover. I also like Gucci! I bring the light to people. I'm a freedom fighter! So u can choose what u like!
And where are you from?
From Romania.

Do you work with Russia or the Russian government?
No because I don't like Russians and their foreign policy. I hate being attributed to Russia.

Why?
I've already told! Also I made a big deal, why you glorify them?

Tell me about the DNC hack. How did you get in?
I hacked that server through the NGP VAN soft, if u understand what I'm talking about.

So that was your entry point, what happened next?
I used 0-day exploit of NGP VAN soft then I installed shell-code into the DNC server. it allowed me to intrude into DNC network. They have Windows-based domain architecture. then I installed my Trojans on several PCs. I had to go from one PC to another every week so CrowdStrike couldn't catch me for a long time. I know that they have cool intrusion detection system. But my heuristic algorithms are better.

When did you first hack them?
Last summer.
And when did you get kicked out?
June 12, when they rebooted their system.

And why did you hack the DNC in the first place?
DNC isn't my first deal.

Who else have you hacked?
Follow my blog and u'll know! I can't tell u now about all my deals. My safety depends on it.
OK, I understand. But why did u target DNC? why are you interested in them?
Lazar began this deal and I follow him! I think we must fight for freedom of minds, fight for the world without Illuminati

Lazar?
Marcel Laz?r [The original Gufficer]
The interview then continued in Romanian to prove that the alleged hacker indeed spoke the language.
Needless to say, it is a stretch to attribute the actions of a lone, copycat hacker, who "hates" being attributed to Russia and who doesn't like "Russians and their foreign policy."
As for Trump being a secret plant for the KGB, one can make a far more "disturbing" assertion that it is Clinton, not Trump, who is in the Russians' pocket. As the WSJ recalled in late 2015, it was Clinton, not Trump, that was paid $500,000 to make Russian problems go away:
The Russian government was opposed to sanctions. At the time, the Obama administration was attempting to reset relations with Russia. The State Department rebuffed the request from Congress. “We…do not support such a measure at this time,” a department official wrote to one senator.
A few weeks later, Bill Clinton participated in a question-and-answer session at a Renaissance Capital investors conference. He was paid $500,000. After the appearance, Mr. Clinton received a personal thank-you call from Vladimir Putin, then the Russian prime minister, the government news agency TASS reported.
Renaissance Capital is one of Russia's largest investment banks.
We wonder if the press (at least those who do not need DNC pre-clearance what to write about as "per the agreement") will inquire about the factual transcript of what Bill Clinton said, that he got a "personal thank you" from Putin in 2010? We doubt it - far more likely is that instead of focusing on the real implications of the DNC hacking scandal, namely the corruption and collusion revealed inside the Democratic party, a far more important "story" will be what is emerging as a "vast left-wing conspiracy", namely how Putin will annex the US if and when Trump, who "experts" will soon elevate to status of KGB spy to spike the narrative, becomes president.
Because that is what - according to experts - is what is truly "disturbing"

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

red diapers:
Several times I’ve written for The American Spectator on the person of David Axelrod, the figure most responsible for giving America two terms of Barack Obama. My first piece was a cover feature for the March 2012 print edition, titled, “David Axelrod, Lefty Lumberjack.” This lengthy profile was followed by an August 2012 piece titled, “All in the (Political) Family.” Then followed still more writings on Axelrod and friends, particularly the new material I reported in my book on Obama’s communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. David Axelrod

These writings got a lot of attention. I discussed the topic a number of times in interviews. People were shocked, and they wanted more. What other skeletons lay in David Axelrod’s political-ideological closet?

I dug into all of the declassified archival documents and old Congressional investigative reports at my disposal. But even then, what I could find was limited by what Axelrod would divulge, and because liberal “journalists” who had profiled Axelrod’s background never dared to raise any red flags from the past of our president’s chief image-maker. Like Obama himself, Obama’s molder and shaper had to be protected by liberal “journalists.”
One crucial opening amid the Axelrod roadblocks came with the death of Axelrod’s mother a little over a year ago, which led to the funeral home posting a bio that finally resolved the remarkably elusive question of the names of her parents and grandparents and other strangely absent information. I reported on this in an April 2014 piece for The American Spectator, titled, “The Quest for David Axelrod’s Leftist Roots.”
Well, now comes another open window: the publication of Axelrod’s memoirs, titled, Believer: My Forty Years in Politics, which contain some things I totally did not expect, namely in the person of Axelrod’s father. Those things prompt me now to write this article.
Before getting to the new things in Believer, here’s a brief summary of what I’ve previously reported on Axelrod’s upbringing:

David Axelrod was born and raised in New York in February 1955 before moving to Chicago in the 1970s to attend college and begin a professional path that would take him into journalism, political campaigns, and eventually the bosom of Barack Hussein Obama. In a very interesting twist of fate in Chicago, Axelrod (like Obama) had his own mentors there — namely, in the Canter family.

The Canters were old hardline pro-Soviet communists, so much so that the senior Canter, Harry Jacob Canter, was actually brought to Moscow during the height of the Stalin period to work for the Soviet government as an official translator of Lenin’s writings. Harry was active in the old Industrial Workers of the World and had been secretary of the Boston Communist Party. He was not shy about his political enthusiasm. In 1930, he ran for governor of Massachusetts on the Communist Party ticket. After that, he sojourned to the Motherland, taking his entire family to Moscow with him, including his son David, who one day would come know David Axelrod.

The Canter family returned to America (Chicago, where the Communist Party was founded in 1919) in the 1940s. In an amazing irony, the Canters actually knew and worked with Obama’s old communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. I even found the Canter names in Davis’s communist newspaper, The Chicago Star. Remarkably, one of the Canters was on the board of a group called the Progressive Publishing Co., which purchased the Star from Davis in 1948, helping grease the skids for Davis’s departure for Hawaii, where he would eventually meet a young Obama.

(For the record, as I’ve noted separately, Davis — again, Obama’s mentor — also knew and worked with Valerie Jarrett’s grandfather and father-in-law in Communist Party/left-wing circles in Chicago in the 1940s.)
The Canter family member who knew David Axelrod best was David Canter. He and another old communist maneuverer from Chicago named Don Rose would mentor David Axelrod and help him secure his first major newspaper jobs at the Hyde Park Herald and then the Chicago Tribune. Axelrod is the first to admit that those jobs launched him.
David Canter and Don Rose did lots of far-left work throughout the 1960s and into the 1970s, associating with all sorts of radical organizations and suspected communist front groups. Rose was so important to Axelrod that even liberal journalists who have profiled Axelrod cannot and do not ignore noting that Rose was a mentor, minus (of course) any inconvenient details about communism.

In short, the Canters and Don Rose were instrumental influences outside of David Axelrod’s family. As for Axelrod’s family, the political-ideological story centers around his mother, Myril, and his father, Joseph.

Politically and ideologically speaking, there has always been more information available on Axelrod’s mother than his father. Myril in the 1940s worked for a prominent left-wing New York daily, PM. The publication was a battleground between non-communist liberals/progressives and closet communists who masqueraded as liberals/progressives. It was heavily penetrated by Communist Party USA members literally sworn to Stalin’s Soviet Union and the Moscow line. The self-proclaimed “liberals/progressives” at PM ranged from Arthur Miller to I. F. Stone, both of whom, we now know, had been communists in the 1930s and perhaps into the 1940s. The famed Arthur Miller was at least a small “c” communist who — as shown by Congress in the 1950s — had applied to join the Communist Party. Miller (we now know) wrote for the Daily Worker and New Masses under pseudonyms. As for Stone, he had been a literal Soviet spy in the late 1930s, though he later came to reject the USSR and became a non-communist leftist of some sort.

Where were Myril’s sympathies? Though I still cannot say with absolute certainly, we did learn only after her death, in her candid obituary posted at the funeral home’s website, that she worked not only as a reporter for PM but as a personal assistant to I. F. Stone on one of his major books on Palestine.
I still don’t know how far to the left Myril stood. I have never encountered any evidence that she was a member of the Communist Party. She was clearly on the left, and no doubt to the left of a Truman-Kennedy Democrat, but how far exactly remains a mystery.
As for David Axelrod’s father, Joseph, he has been portrayed in all of the profiles of David as a lovable, happy-go-lucky psychiatrist who loved baseball, with nary a political bone in his body. I’ve always been skeptical of that, because I know that liberal “journalists” do what they can not to present damning information on the people they need to protect. Nonetheless, I could never find anything of substance on the politics of David’s father.

All of which brings me to David’s new book.

In Believer, you will not find a word from David Axelrod on the Canter family. No surprise. You will find a few words about Don Rose, who Axelrod twice refers to as his “mentor,” but you will not get even a whiff of a suggestion of Rose’s radical politics, let alone the “c” word. Rose is portrayed as a merry progressive fighting for the civil rights of minorities.

As for David’s mom, he mentions PM and even her work for I. F. Stone, but again, the “c” word appears nowhere. In fact — with one curious exception, as we’ll see below — I couldn’t find the word “communist,” let alone “Stalinist,” anywhere in the book. I learned nothing new about Myril Axelrod or her politics in David’s memoirs. David claimed that his mother “wasn’t an ideologue,” but who knows what that means.
But what really surprised me — and prompts this article — is what David divulged about his father’s political affiliation, though he attempted to do so in a light-hearted, dismissive way:
Joseph Axelrod’s family fled Russia along with other Jews during one of the periods of czarist persecution early in the 20th century. (David’s mother’s family were also Jewish immigrants from Russia.) They first landed in Montreal but ended up in the Bronx about the time that Joseph turned 12 years old (circa 1931).

Joseph enrolled in college at John Dewey’s Columbia University, always the most radical college in America, which has easily processed more members of the Communist Party, sympathizers, and even agents than any academic institution. Though David doesn’t given dates, I estimate that Joseph was at Columbia shortly after or around the time that the university turned Thomas Merton and Bella Dodd into communists, and just as one of its earlier graduates, Whittaker Chambers, was spying for the Soviet Union. This would have been around the time Elizabeth Bentley got to Columbia and turned into a communist en route to becoming a Soviet spy, and not long after Margaret Mead got there and turned hard left. Joseph studied philosophy there, where he surely would have encountered the odious Corliss Lamont, one of the worst pro-Marxist dupes of the 20th century, who was there teaching “philosophy” with Professor Dewey and their comrades.

Needless to say, David Axelrod doesn’t get into any of this. He merely says that his father “studied philosophy for a time at Columbia University.”

But then comes a striking item volunteered by David. In the next line, he writes: “In keeping with his bohemian lifestyle, when Dad registered to vote at the height of the Depression, he listed his party affiliation as ‘Communist.’”
Whoa? Really? What’s up with that?
We always had communist suspicions regarding David’s mother, but never his father. The dad was reportedly the non-political one. The mom was the big lefty. Now we’re suddenly cracking open David’s memoirs, thinking we might find information on the politics of the mom, only to learn that the old man was a Red?
This is apparently something that David felt he needed to get out in the open, and dismiss. He tells us in the next sentence, “Years later, when a friend used my dad as a reference for a promotion in the military, Dad’s youthful act of defiance came up.”
I’m sure it did. This tantalizing item must be listed on paper somewhere, apparently prompting David to feel the need to report it before someone found it someday. But David just as quickly, in the very next line, laughs it off, quoting his dad:
“They figured if I had really been a member of the Communist Party, I would have registered as a Republican, to throw everyone off the scent,” my dad told me, recounting the drama. And of course, they were right. Dad wasn’t much of a joiner, unless you count baseball teams.
There you go: back to baseball, out of the communist orbit. With that, David provides no other details. He raises the issue and then shrugs it off with a laugh — thus signaling that any conservative who dares to raise the issue will be at best a laughable buffoon and at worst (more likely, of course) an ugly, vile McCarthyite with no shame, one who vulgarly sees a red under every bed, one chasing down poor David’s father with torches.
Nonetheless, I find this eye-opening. To be sure, it’s limited in what we can take away. An emailer who read the book before I did wrote me excitably announcing that Axelrod’s memoir reveals that his father was “a member of the Communist Party.” No, the memoir does not say that. It says his father once listed “Communist” as his party affiliation but later suggested to his son that he had not been a party member.
David would thus say that we can’t say that his dad was a communist. And indeed, where’s the proof? Well, there’s maybe this hard copy, printed military reference somewhere, but David has just pulled the carpet out from under it — at least to the satisfaction of liberals, who are convinced that America is teeming with hundreds of millions of unregenerate racists and “homophobes” but no communist ever once tread this country’s soil. David’s dismissal will be more than enough for liberals’ complete satisfaction.
The reality is that confirming these things is highly elusive. Finding Communist Party registration rolls is extremely difficult. That said, some such material exists and is scattered and out there. If anyone reading this has access to Communist Party material or registration rolls from the Bronx district in the latter 1930s, take a look for a “Joseph Axelrod.”
Finally, politics aside, I would be callous not to note that David Axelrod’s words on his father in his memoir are quite moving. He offers a gripping, tragic account of his father’s suicide in the spring of 1974 while David was in Chicago. His father hung himself at his New York studio apartment. David was, of course, shocked. “There was no one I loved more,” he wrote. “I hoped he knew that.” It was a very sad end.
It certainly was. One cannot help but be touched by this.
As for the focus here in this piece — the politics — how political was the father? How ideological was he? I grudgingly accepted for a while the narrative that his father was apolitical, but how can I still accept that? I know now that Joseph Axelrod once listed himself as a registered communist. Who does that? My dad never did that. Did yours?
This tells us something — at the very least, something.
In all, we are left with David Axelrod, the man who gave us our first Red-Diaper Baby President, with an upbringing that might have a few red diapers of its own. And as I’ve said often, if you think such backgrounds are totally irrelevant, you’re lying to yourself. No, it doesn’t make Axelrod a secret member of Communist Party USA, or Barack Obama the Manchurian Candidate, but these radical-left pasts had an impact that should never be casually dismissed.
Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College, executive director of The Center for Vision & Values, and New York Times best-selling author of the book, “The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.” His other books include “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism” and “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century.” The original article was posted at American Spectator.

TOPICS: Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: New York
KEYWORDS: chicago; davidaxelrod; obama

I was a democrat long ago and no sane soul should be.
http://www.stallingsdrivechurchofchrist ... ss/?p=2595

http://nypost.com/2016/05/13/were-runni ... manifesto/ The book, published by the small Mill City Press, is based on years of transcribed private discussions, which the congressman last November gave editor Robert Atkinson.

Stewart sat down to discuss the presidential race and American politics with former Obama senior adviser David Axelrod.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/jon-stewa ... 45677.html
Stewart is smarter than that.

http://gdxforum.com/forum/search.php?ke ... sf=msgonly

Abd al-Malik then issued a decree making it the only currency to be used throughout Umayyad lands. All remaining Byzantine and Arab-Byzantine pieces had to be handed to the treasury, to be melted down and re-struck. Those who did not comply faced the death penalty.

The arms of the sword wielding executioner will be weary as they slaughter the anglo lambs.
The political rot in the west will cease when they breath no more...

They toss the lifeless corpse into the ditches as you ponder gender bathrooms. Peak insanity.

2 Chronicles 7:14 as an often-cited example: "If My people, who are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray and seek My face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.

By the time of the Revolution, ideas of providence and of America's millennial role had been modified, if not secularized, by Enlightenment rationalism. If Benjamin Franklin, the only self-professed deist among the leading founders, could believe in God's general providential plan for the United States, then the ubiquitous references to God's interposing providence tell us little about the influence of distinctive religious thought on the founding generation.
The majority of the founders also believed that religion was necessary for maintaining moral virtue and assumed that the nation would remain culturally Christian.
But people should be cautious about reading too much into the religious rhetoric during the founding period.

Of the freedom left preserved we will organize what can be salvaged for the remaining supply chains functional.
The operating partners understand what is coming. Do you?

Meanwhile, House Armed Services Committee chair Mac Thornberry (R-TX) filed legislation that would slash the size of the National Security Council from its estimated size of 400 staffers, down to 100.

“All of President Obama’s former Defense Secretaries have complained about micromanagement by the NSC. I have personally heard from troops on the frontlines who have received intimidating calls from junior White House staffers,” Thornberry said in a statement.
“The current NSC has grown so large that the White House cannot even give us a clear estimate of how many people actually work for it. Now we hear reports of NSC staffers running misinformation campaigns targeted at Congress and the press,” he added.
In addition to irking Congress, reporters, and foreign policy analysts, Rhodes’ comments drudge up other memories for some experts.
Rhodes “comes off like a real asshole,” Thomas Ricks, a Pulitzer Prize-winning military correspondent, wrote last week.
“Fact check: Obama’s hasn’t been an original foreign policy as much as it has been a politicized foreign policy. And this Rhodes guy reminds me of the Kennedy smart guys who helped get us into the Vietnam War,” he added.

Last time we had sharp elbows like this the damn city was on fire and they sold yellow cake later.

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/20 ... /?mod=sfmw

Any one who has not been over his skis is not worth reading. As for the glass house and rocks bullshit what's coming for your lunch money as no
issues with you as you depart this planet in a slip trench.

Containment and the context does matter over time as we aspire to understand.

http://www.history.ucsb.edu/faculty/mar ... 47gWeb.pdf

http://gray.ftp.clickability.com/wjrtwe ... elease.pdf

The good news is no one can be surprised. I think the Localitys did what was needed. People also need to think. Some took out soldered pipes decades ago who did think.
Already they are circing the Govenor with when and why. I do not consider it valid.
Detroit took decades to feel good and destroy itself, and the issue was yea we already knew that when New York imploded.
Currently the Office wishes to define themselves. Sorry that is not a option now is it since experimental investigations of self-affirmation theory suggest that self-affirmation can help individuals cope with threat or stress and that it might be beneficial for improving academic performance, health, and reducing defensiveness. Basically Axelrod's studies of evolutionary competition in an iterated Prisoners' Dilemma. The teleological adjective as Philosophy of, or relating to teleology, the philosophical doctrine that final causes, design, and purpose exist in nature.
Nero, a confirmed sociopath, ruled from 54 to 68 C.E. and persecuted Christians by wrapping them in garments covered with pitch, fastening them to poles and then setting them on fire to light up his gardens during the evening festivities, thus developing the Roman Candle. At least we knew who he was working for...http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/mom/mom06.htm

Donec ponam inimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-midea ... QR20151026

http://www.businessinsider.com/europes- ... ns-2015-10

http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/judaism ... emid=10842#!

It was conveyed that "Germany’s right-wing Chancellor", Angela Merkel, ---- teh lulz ----
is receiving pressure from a marginal leftist Party, to abandon the American anti-Assad war.
Does it matter?
Does your faith hinge on this knowlege?

https://larouchepac.com/20141206/nuland ... war-russia

here are the other puppet masters:

Rahm Emanuel is the same Israeli who ran the White House under Bill Clinton, although he did not have the chief of staff position. Emanuel has controlled Obama for years.
Rahm Emanuel, who is named after a Lehi (Stern Gang) terrorist named Rahamim Cohen, and David Axelrod have been working together since 1984 when they teamed up to help Paul Simon (Mr. Bowtie) defeat Sen. Charles Percy (R-Ill.).
These two Zionists spearheaded the campaign to put Barack Obama into the White House. Axelrod and Emanuel, however, were being supported by a much higher Zionist -- Bettylu Saltzman, the only daughter of the super-Zionist Philip Klutznick.
Axelrod has been creating and shaping Candidate Obama for more than 16 years. "Axelrod met Obama when the senator was 30 years old and coordinating a voter-registration drive in Chicago and Bettylu Saltzman, a doyenne of progressive politics in Chicago, suggested that the two get to know each other," the New York Times reported in early 2007. "In the 15 years since, Axelrod has worked through Obama's life story again and again, scouring it for usable political material.
Bettylu Saltzman has been supporting and financing Obama's political career since 1992, long before he ran for any office. In 1992, when Obama was 30 years old, Saltzman told Axelrod and others, "He will be our first black president.'' Saltzman then commissioned Axelrod to create Obama, the presidential candidate. 06 November 2008

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/natio ... icago.html
1. Fish heads of the brokered death cult is imploding just as they push the petal to metal on open border to keep
Johnsons axiom alive to "teh" vote enclaves. The shifting tectonics plates of salt water to fresh water economics with pond water
as we consider Greece as is the southern front.
2. Vanguard under attack as they want to parasite the investor owned funds.

As you warranted correctly, " If you think about that one difference between the 1980s and today, then you realize that it's one measure of vast differences in behaviors and attitudes -- attitudes towards crime, attitudes towards money, attitudes toward ethics and morality. It would also affect attitudes toward violence and destroying other people's property, which is directly relevant to the Minerva study referenced above."
The past defines no inclination of a future either we witness. As Old noted as in the affair of August 4, 1692, Mather delivered a sermon warning that the Last Judgment was near at hand. On August 19, Mather was in Salem to witness the execution of ex-minister George Burroughs for witchcraft. When, on Gallows Hill, Burroughs was able to recite the Lord's Prayer perfectly (something that witches were thought incapable of doing) and some in the crowd called for the execution to be stopped, Mather intervened, reminding those gathered that Burroughs had been duly convicted by a jury. No different today at all.

The point is the eastern liberal maniacs that merged with the fresh water camp maniacs as the left coast sinks in dissarray and a nuclear waste land from the thyroid cancer spikes onsets as seen developing. I will check back on the cluster study to our locality in cancer spike. The most disturbing trend is the fact that the higher the monetary claim as noted in the rentiers classes the more they posit it was from birth defects from the previous parents genome and not the current factors that lead to the cutural ignorances of indifference not to see exposures. Not seeing is porportional to income and is just another staggering reality as before. Better for some than others, so we move ahead in faith.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/s/hagel- ... 36456.html
Since 1996 they clearly understood in my opinion only the only secure location is one that even your coworkers will ignore since that makes sense so why bother with seared minds. The facts are clear on that point and how long to recover inertia agan. The only good damn thing right now is anom is going after the black hole hats which indeed was seen before they even had clue since the fiber ring project long ago.

noske http://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php ... ske#p27359

No need to explain the marbles being picked up as the alleged World moves on just as before. The contention rings true
to the legal cartels Hayek and Keynes noted as the only reference to mitigation points of time only.
And the world moved on, since the warning where unheeded from old and in His name to suffer and it will not be found.
They will grind you to dust in percentages of change. Order from chaos demonstrates in mathematical terms that a system
can only become more ordered when the system is acted on by energy more ordered than the system itself.

The lords hand will move what needs to be, and his people will serve his voice to each other.

As for the one who claims Saul is for one and not another Ananias answered, “Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much harm he has done to Your saints in Jerusalem. And here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on Your name.”
But the Lord said to him, “Go, for he is a chosen vessel of Mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel. For I will show him how many things he must suffer for My name’s sake.”
And Ananias went his way and entered the house; and laying his hands on him he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you came, has sent me that you may receive your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.” Immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he received his sight at once; and he arose and was baptized.
So when he had received food, he was strengthened. Then Saul spent some days with the disciples at Damascus.

My fear is simple as we are Damascus will be no more if we do not fear what was said before we where. Simple warning from others is all.