Search found 106 matches: Unraveling

Searched query: unraveling

by Cool Breeze
Sat Apr 15, 2023 11:51 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

richard5za wrote: Sat Apr 15, 2023 9:07 am
Cool Breeze wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:43 pm
Things are unraveling as we speak. The news items talking about USD losing reserve status is also either predictive programming, or "told you so" news.
I am not clear on what you are saying about USD? Two years ago the value of USD against a basket of glogal currencies was 90 (approx) and on Friday close it was over 101; thats not a currency about to fall over. World debt is I understand over USD 340 trillion. Do you know how long it would take to find replacements for the world's reserve currency?
Our next crisis in my opinion is unsustainable debt; a debt crisis; everyone and every currency will suffer but it will be the lesser currencies that take the worst knocks. In this event I am bullish on gold (5 thousand year history)
Yes, recall that basically DXY is USD vs Euro and Yen. Haha, great shakes there, USD is sooooo strong. That's why the yuan AND ruble beat it up since the Russian invasion - wonder why they don't tell you that. Oh yeah, why would you need to see it, peon, we tell you what's good for you

Either way, gold will do fine, I own some of it. But BTC will destroy it all, as it has already done this year, again. But don't listen to CB, who has some sort of knack about this stuff

Math doesn't lie
by richard5za
Sat Apr 15, 2023 9:07 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

Cool Breeze wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:43 pm
Things are unraveling as we speak. The news items talking about USD losing reserve status is also either predictive programming, or "told you so" news.
I am not clear on what you are saying about USD? Two years ago the value of USD against a basket of glogal currencies was 90 (approx) and on Friday close it was over 101; thats not a currency about to fall over. World debt is I understand over USD 340 trillion. Do you know how long it would take to find replacements for the world's reserve currency?
Our next crisis in my opinion is unsustainable debt; a debt crisis; everyone and every currency will suffer but it will be the lesser currencies that take the worst knocks. In this event I am bullish on gold (5 thousand year history)
by Cool Breeze
Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:43 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

John wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:41 pm
Cool Breeze wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:06 pm
ojavaid wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:22 pm Great article

https://www.wsj.com/articles/black-swan ... 1675177877
Do you have a summary, or what you took away?
I asked Bing AI to summarize the article. Here's what came back:

The article you provided is about Mark Spitznagel, the founder of hedge fund Universa Investments, who believes that the financial system is poised for a crisis1234. He warns that the economy has too much debt and that it could have consequences similar to the Great Depression4. He calls it a “Tinderbox-Timebomb” which will be even worse than the 1929 stock market crash5.


the numbers 12345 are all links to other articles.
Things are unraveling as we speak. The news items talking about USD losing reserve status is also either predictive programming, or "told you so" news. I think they know it's coming. I am on record saying that in the next 2-6 months markets drop (yes that means BTC to some extent too, maybe pretty big) over 20% and possibly 50+%

There's something big brewing. FedNow is slated for its arrival in July.

The Fed could have saved SVB, but decided not to. Why? You know why, they don't like BTC or crypto. But the cat's out the bag.

Your take, John?
by Cool Breeze
Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:06 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

John wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:38 pm ** 27-Jan-2022 World View: The Deep State on Ukraine
vincecate wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:57 am > John, what is really going on with Russia and Ukraine?
John wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 9:31 am > ** 27-Jan-2022 World View: Russia and Ukraine [Corrected]

> See my post yesterday afternoon in the news thread:
> viewtopic.php?p=67953#p67953
Cool Breeze wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:26 pm > Did you consider my question about how much the swamp wants a war?
> I'm curious as to how bellicose you think the US authorities,
> bureaucrats and military are currently (regarding any
>
war).
Well, my post was intended to answer this and similar questions,
when I wrote that the question is irrelevant, since only Putin
can decide whether there will be a war.

Do I believe that "the swamp wants a war"? I really don't, in the
sense that I think you mean. That is, I don't believe that there's
any significant effort by policymakers to force the issue and lead to
a war. I'm sure there are some individuals in that category, but most
people in the swamp are motivated by money and power, and starting a
war will not bring much money or power to a low-level functionary. A
military general who already has a lot of power would know that the
blood and horrors of war would not bring him more power.

But if you move this discussion out of the "swamp" into the general
public, it's a lot more complicated. During a generational Unraveling
era (the 1990s), the public is generally opposed to war and in favor
of compromise. As the Crisis era begins (2003) and continues, the
public becomes more belligerent and nationalistic. This is
particularly evident in the Chinese press (Global Times), which
frequently advocates an invasion of Taiwan.

However, as I referenced in my last post to DaKardii, there's a split.
Some people are highly isolationist (favoring appeasement), and some
people are nationalistic (favoring military action). Both sides are
delusional. The isolationists are deluded because they think that the
country can remain isolationist. The belligerent nationalists are
delusional because the swift military victory that they imagine won't
happen.
Nice response, thanks.

Why can't the US be/remain isolationist? What would they lose? Would it really matter?
by John
Thu Jan 27, 2022 6:38 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

** 27-Jan-2022 World View: The Deep State on Ukraine
vincecate wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 8:57 am > John, what is really going on with Russia and Ukraine?
John wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 9:31 am > ** 27-Jan-2022 World View: Russia and Ukraine [Corrected]

> See my post yesterday afternoon in the news thread:
> viewtopic.php?p=67953#p67953
Cool Breeze wrote: Thu Jan 27, 2022 12:26 pm > Did you consider my question about how much the swamp wants a war?
> I'm curious as to how bellicose you think the US authorities,
> bureaucrats and military are currently (regarding any
>
war).
Well, my post was intended to answer this and similar questions,
when I wrote that the question is irrelevant, since only Putin
can decide whether there will be a war.

Do I believe that "the swamp wants a war"? I really don't, in the
sense that I think you mean. That is, I don't believe that there's
any significant effort by policymakers to force the issue and lead to
a war. I'm sure there are some individuals in that category, but most
people in the swamp are motivated by money and power, and starting a
war will not bring much money or power to a low-level functionary. A
military general who already has a lot of power would know that the
blood and horrors of war would not bring him more power.

But if you move this discussion out of the "swamp" into the general
public, it's a lot more complicated. During a generational Unraveling
era (the 1990s), the public is generally opposed to war and in favor
of compromise. As the Crisis era begins (2003) and continues, the
public becomes more belligerent and nationalistic. This is
particularly evident in the Chinese press (Global Times), which
frequently advocates an invasion of Taiwan.

However, as I referenced in my last post to DaKardii, there's a split.
Some people are highly isolationist (favoring appeasement), and some
people are nationalistic (favoring military action). Both sides are
delusional. The isolationists are deluded because they think that the
country can remain isolationist. The belligerent nationalists are
delusional because the swift military victory that they imagine won't
happen.
by John
Thu Dec 09, 2021 7:34 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

** 09-Dec-2021 World View: Scarcity-based Inflation
vincecate wrote: Thu Dec 09, 2021 6:41 pm > I would also argue that before WW2 the US dollar came very close
> to hyperinflation. The Fed was supposed to have gold backing USD
> but did not really have enough. As people converted back to gold
> and withdrew gold eventually the paper money would have had
> hyperinflation. The way the US prevented this was by making it
> illegal for US citizens to own gold.

> Anyway, so hyperinflation was nearly 3 crisis out of 3 in the US.

> https://howfiatdies.blogspot.com/2010/1 ... ndard.html
Here is my table of historical CPI data from 1914 to the present:

http://www.generationaldynamics.com/pg/ww2010.i.cpi.htm

This table shows that there was disinflation during the Great
Depression, prior to WW II, but increased late in 1941 and in 1942.

So let's see if we can be a little more nuanced. Let's say that there
are two different kinds of inflation -- debt-based inflation and
scarcity-based inflation.

Debt-based inflation occurs during Awakening/Unraveling eras, when
people are willing go into debt to make purchases, pushing up prices.

Scarcity-based inflation can occur any time, but especially during a
Crisis era, when goods become scarce.

A Crisis era really has two parts, peace time and war, separated by
the Regeneracy events. So when the war actually begins, there will
typically be scarcity-based inflation, sometimes combined with
rationing.

So debt-based inflation can't occur during a Crisis era, but
scarcity-based inflation does occur, and the inflation worsens as the
scarcity worsens.
by vincecate
Thu Dec 09, 2021 2:52 pm
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

John wrote: Thu Dec 09, 2021 12:27 pm The first thing to point out is that the Weimar, Venezuela and
Zimbabwe hyperinflations, as well as the high inflation in 1970s US,
all occurred during generational Awakening-Unraveling eras. This is
the key to understanding what's going on. The US today is in a
generational Crisis era.
In the US Revolutionary war crisis era they had hyperinflation. The expression "not worth a Continental" lasted long after that money was replaced. It is why the US constitution says "No State shall [...]; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts". The people who went through hyperinflation wanted to make sure it did not happen again.

In the US Civil War crisis era the South had hyperinflation. In war the losing side often has hyperinflation.

To me it seems 2 of the last 3 crisis eras in America had hyperinflation. So I don't understand why you think crisis eras don't have to worry about hyperinflation. To me it seems a high probability event during an American crisis era.
by John
Wed Dec 08, 2021 10:19 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

** 08-Dec-2021 World View: Friday's CPI report
vincecate wrote: Wed Dec 08, 2021 12:00 am > "Traders of derivatives-like instruments known as “fixings” are
> betting that the headline, year-over-year CPI reading for November
> will rise by 6.9%, which would be the highest inflation level in
> almost four decades. That’s a bit above the 6.7% median estimate
> of economists polled by the Wall Street Journal."

> https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trade ... 1638625318
richard5za wrote: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:06 am > The lack of concern by the market which roared up again yesterday
> is something I am not understanding at all. It makes me think that
> I must have misunderstood or missed something. How can everyone
> not see the obvious trigger to a market bear?
The lack of concern in the market is that investors, like me, do not
believe the hysterical claims of hyperinflationary cpi, matching the
levels of the 1970s, that the so-called experts in the media keep
claiming. The historical examples of high inflation (Weimar,
Zimbabwe, Venezuela, America 1970s) all occurred during generational
Awakening-Unraveling eras, when people are willing to go into debt and
spend recklessly. America today is in a generational Crisis debt,
when people are already loaded with debt, and avoid further debt, and
spend cautiously.

How was that figure of 6.9% arrived at? I guess it's possible, though
it's certainly a lot higher than I expect. Did the "experts" actually
do some analysis that leads to that figure, or did they just make a
knee-jerk forecast based on their fading memories of the 1970s?

The core reason for inflation this year has been scarcity of popular
consumer products, and that was caused by supply chain issues
following the pandemic lockdowns and paying people not to work.

But I've been hearing news reports that the supply chain backups have
been easing significantly. There are only 20 ships waiting offshore
in California, while there were 89 ships a couple of months ago. The
number of containers onshore that haven't been picked up by truckers
has been reduced. And the payments to people not to work have been
ending.

As I'm typing this, I'm hearing a report that oil crude prices are
falling, where analysts had been predicting they'd rise.

As I'm typing this, another report says that hotels are having to pay
higher wages to get back workers who were laid off during the
pandemic.

The so-called "experts" keep making the same mistake. They keep
saying that "those high prices will never come back down." Whether
that's true or not is irrelevant to the cpi. Last month's rate was
6.3%. If those high prices merely remain the same, that's 0%
inflation. In order to achieve 6.9%, then you'd have to have 200
ships waiting offshore in California, or you'd have to have some other
problem. Maybe there's something I haven't heard of, but I'm not
aware of something big enough to cause inflation to explode higher.

In the "Societal Collapse" thread, tankbuilder and FullMoon pointed
out a story on a shortage of nitrogen fertilizer that affect crop and
food prices next year.

https://www.producer.com/crops/nitrogen ... worldwide/

Whether or not the nitrogen fertilizer shortage will affect food
prices is uncertain, but even if it does, it won't affect the cpi for
many months to come.

So my point is that investors are not reacting to the predictions of
very high inflation because investors do not believe those
predictions.

In fact, you have predictions all over the map. I cannot recall a
time when there was so much confusion. And with the rise of the
omicron variant, the confusion is turning to desperation, as
government officials try to figure out how to prevent the spread of
covid, and have no clue how to do it. Different countries and
different states have different rules regarding vaccinations,
mandates, masking, isolation, quarantines and lockdowns. It's
impossible to take a vacation without having to go crazy trying to
figure out what the rules will be wherever you're going and how you
get there.

Vince points out that there are lots of "momentum traders" who have no
clue what's going on in the stock market and will sell as soon as it
starts to go down. Others are saying that "you cannot time the market

An announcement just now from Pfizer: three doses of their vaccine
neutralizes the omicron variant, and they're working on an
omicron-specific vaccine. That just adds to the confusion and
desperation, since government officials have no idea how it changes
their policies.

I don't really believe that "experts" trying to predict the cpi have
any reason but their "feelings." So we'll see on Friday whether
they're right, and the cpi reaches 6.9%.
by richard5za
Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:49 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

John wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:55 am ** 03-Dec-2021 World View: Gold prices vs inflation
richard5za wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:33 am > The Gold Observer article is making a different point. Its saying
> that the gold price is an accurate predictor of inflation. It is
> saying when gold price is charted against USA inflation for the
> period 1968 through to 2021, when the gold price goes up then, at
> a lag, the inflation increases. To get the full sense of the point
> being made you need to read the article; my summary here is
> inadequate to full sense
richard5za wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:49 am > Here's the link for the chart described above:

> https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_ ... 3x4136.png
Being a totally suspicious person, I question why that graph stops at
the year 1994, and covers only the generational Awakening and
Unraveling eras. Nothing that happened during that period can be
assumed to be the same as would happen today, in a generational Crisis
era.

Actually, stopping a graph at 1994, and not extending it to 2021, is
such an egregious error that I really can't think of any benign reason
for the error.

Maybe gold prices and inflation are still correlated, but maybe not.
If the graph continued to 2021, then we could make that judgment.
John, the point that I previously made was that you do need to read the full article, which does have graphs through to the current date. I simply extracted the main point of the article that the gold price is a predicter of future inflation.
by John
Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:55 am
Forum: Finance and Investments
Topic: Financial topics
Replies: 29822
Views: 16848287

Re: Financial topics

** 03-Dec-2021 World View: Gold prices vs inflation
richard5za wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 6:33 am > The Gold Observer article is making a different point. Its saying
> that the gold price is an accurate predictor of inflation. It is
> saying when gold price is charted against USA inflation for the
> period 1968 through to 2021, when the gold price goes up then, at
> a lag, the inflation increases. To get the full sense of the point
> being made you need to read the article; my summary here is
> inadequate to full sense
richard5za wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:49 am > Here's the link for the chart described above:

> https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/f_ ... 3x4136.png
Being a totally suspicious person, I question why that graph stops at
the year 1994, and covers only the generational Awakening and
Unraveling eras. Nothing that happened during that period can be
assumed to be the same as would happen today, in a generational Crisis
era.

Actually, stopping a graph at 1994, and not extending it to 2021, is
such an egregious error that I really can't think of any benign reason
for the error.

Maybe gold prices and inflation are still correlated, but maybe not.
If the graph continued to 2021, then we could make that judgment.