Their name came from Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, a Roman general made famous for his use of guerrilla warfare to slowly wear down superior forces instead of fighting in quick, large-scale battles.
And therein lies the methodology behind the current socialist push for cultural Marxism, open borders, and other radical progressive ideologies and policies.
Lightswitch is black gold just as blackcrack is the housing issue.
Control the debt you control the conflict.
Manchin Slams Dem Spending Plan As "Definition Of Fiscal Insanity", Will Not "Reengineer Social Fabric" With 'Vengeful' Taxation. WED SEP 29, AT 5:20 PM
I still think Americans are idiots unable to awake.
Millions lost everything. We do not even have a inflated number for the homeless even locally now.
Mindless addicts from the open border human trafficking and Alinsky cults.
Catastrophe covers it with lie cheat steal.
search.php?keywords=Quintus+&t=2&sf=msgonly
Your confused on transitory.
We still recommend toe tags at dawn in conflict zones that need to be encapsulated.
Racism is a crayon chewers NGO rhetical device as the offshore POA in effects of and in the paradise and panama papers few even read.
What is your solution other than capital accumulation as we are to fund what is important first.
Your future is being delivered.
Fri Aug 02, 2019 7:06 am
http://ecofascism.com/article34.html#corporatism
Three elements determine a fair wage: The worker's family responsibilities, the economic condition of the enterprise and the economy as a whole. The family has an innate right to development, but this is only possible within the framework of a functioning economy and sound enterprises.
Unlike Leo XIII, who addressed the condition of workers, Pius XI discusses the ethical implications of the social and economic order.
If they are not interested in fair trade and terms it is clear what is served of any order.
Today they worship the no border Stat-ist and as we have seen they wiped you out with MMT and UBI semantics.
We have persisted in charity of the infirm and widowed and very young.
It is obvious who was not paying attention.
I called Vanguard in August.
They are educated retards and with Blackrock just got wiped out of 250 million.
I do not think the gap will be filled on spx and we all know the xyear rate and blackgold.
I sold all strawberry's and in cash.
Lumber futures have carved an apparent bottom for yea it is transitory.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/mich ... vaccinated
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-yiHpShP8s
thread: amos, wasting, 936
Search found 2 matches: Quintus
Searched query: quintus
- Wed Sep 29, 2021 7:42 pm
- Forum: Finance and Investments
- Topic: Financial topics
- Replies: 29822
- Views: 16825894
- Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:27 pm
- Forum: Finance and Investments
- Topic: Financial topics
- Replies: 29822
- Views: 16825894
Re: Financial topics
Dimon said Europe was the worst problem for the banking sector. "But the EU and euro are solid even if the states will have to be financially responsible and do all they can to develop common social policies," he said."
Business leaders are starting to brisle up. These bankers are smarter than the market Higg since it is not there money.
Note the geopolitical fruitcakes ecalations in this affair we posted as Quintus Fabius Maxim. The Leviathon is loose
and cannot be contained. Mere spectators, to the inane affairs of wisdom and humanity of the day we mentioned
pages back. I was having a focused conversation with my wife who had issue with a observation. It sumed to this.
"Man and person were not equivalent terms. A slave was not a person, but a thing; a person was a human being endowed with civil status."
We covered no man status already. When we slave to desire we are subject to consequences to a few. They will learn from
travail of lessons that cannot be tought. They consider trillions a solution as bricks into the tower of modern babel IMO.
It is no difference than this time reference:
Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:25 pm
“In the real world, banks extend credit, creating deposits in the process, and look for reserves later”.
We see who paid for that.
Their empirical conclusion was just the opposite: rather than fiat money being created first and credit money following with a lag, the sequence was reversed: credit money was created first, and fiat money was then created about a year later:
Having failed to understand the mechanism of money creation in a credit money world, and failed to understand how that mechanism goes into reverse during a financial crisis, neoclassical economics may end up doing what by accident what Marx failed to achieve by deliberate action, and bring capitalism to its knees.
Academic economics responded to these empirical challenges to its accepted theory in the time-honoured way: it ignored them.
Well, the so-called “mainstream” did—the school of thought known as “Neoclassical economics”. A rival school of thought, known as Post Keynesian economics, took these problems seriously, and developed a different theory of how money is created that is more consistent with the data.
The standard money multiplier model’s assumption that banks wait passively for deposits before starting to lend is false. Rather than bankers sitting back passively, waiting for depositors to give them excess reserves that they can then on-lend.
Interferes in actual production in a most dangerous manner since it is impossible to mark and measure moral hazard malinvestments from a premise of credit collapse with out marked to market seeking stabilization.
Basil Moore 1983, “Unpacking the post Keynesian black box: bank lending and the money supply”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1983, Vol. 4 pp. 537-556; here Moore was quoting a Federal Reserve economist from a 1969 conference in which the endogeneity of the money supply was being debated.
Consumption of fixed capital
2005 1612.0 billion
2006 1623.9 billion
2007 1720.5 billion
2008 2032.3 billion
So, they print more and more will never be enough since there is no market signal to refer to.
is this true or false to date: http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/s ... ords=romer
This is in direct context to multiplier.
Romers work for the administration's theory of money multiplier was based on Fishers observations and it is in the forums from the 1930's.
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2&p=3891&hilit=romer#p3891
How to generate severe stagflation in the years 2010 through 2019 right on que thanks Washington provided below.
The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a new Measure of Fiscal Shocks, by Christina D. and David H. Romer (March 2007). (Christina Romer now chairs the president's Council of Economic Advisors). This study found that the tax multiplier is 3, meaning that each dollar rise in taxes will reduce private spending by $3."
In the same vein: This is from Professor Fisher's book entitled 100% Money, revised edition
published by The Adelphi Company (1936)
There is a growing opinion among specialists in this field that the per capita money income is approximately equal to three times the per capita
money in circulation. Should this opinion be confirmed - that money and money income maintain an approximately constant ratio or even that this
would be true in the absence of great booms and depressions - we would reach the rather startling conclusion that to maintain the dollar as a
fixed fraction of per capita income would amount to the same thing as fixing the per capita supply of money and that the only statistics needed
by the Currency Commission would be those of population. We cannot, as yet, be sure that the two criteria - a fixed per capita quantity of money
and a dollar as a fixed fraction of the per capita income - are so nearly the same; but we can at least be sure that the per capita quantity plan
would not be a bad solution of the money problem. To note, this calculation exists.
We are right on target to what we already know. Also Fisher dies bankrupt and under his Family's dominion.
http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/v ... omer#p3608
Business leaders are starting to brisle up. These bankers are smarter than the market Higg since it is not there money.
Note the geopolitical fruitcakes ecalations in this affair we posted as Quintus Fabius Maxim. The Leviathon is loose
and cannot be contained. Mere spectators, to the inane affairs of wisdom and humanity of the day we mentioned
pages back. I was having a focused conversation with my wife who had issue with a observation. It sumed to this.
"Man and person were not equivalent terms. A slave was not a person, but a thing; a person was a human being endowed with civil status."
We covered no man status already. When we slave to desire we are subject to consequences to a few. They will learn from
travail of lessons that cannot be tought. They consider trillions a solution as bricks into the tower of modern babel IMO.
It is no difference than this time reference:
Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:25 pm
“In the real world, banks extend credit, creating deposits in the process, and look for reserves later”.
We see who paid for that.
Their empirical conclusion was just the opposite: rather than fiat money being created first and credit money following with a lag, the sequence was reversed: credit money was created first, and fiat money was then created about a year later:
Having failed to understand the mechanism of money creation in a credit money world, and failed to understand how that mechanism goes into reverse during a financial crisis, neoclassical economics may end up doing what by accident what Marx failed to achieve by deliberate action, and bring capitalism to its knees.
Academic economics responded to these empirical challenges to its accepted theory in the time-honoured way: it ignored them.
Well, the so-called “mainstream” did—the school of thought known as “Neoclassical economics”. A rival school of thought, known as Post Keynesian economics, took these problems seriously, and developed a different theory of how money is created that is more consistent with the data.
The standard money multiplier model’s assumption that banks wait passively for deposits before starting to lend is false. Rather than bankers sitting back passively, waiting for depositors to give them excess reserves that they can then on-lend.
Interferes in actual production in a most dangerous manner since it is impossible to mark and measure moral hazard malinvestments from a premise of credit collapse with out marked to market seeking stabilization.
Basil Moore 1983, “Unpacking the post Keynesian black box: bank lending and the money supply”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1983, Vol. 4 pp. 537-556; here Moore was quoting a Federal Reserve economist from a 1969 conference in which the endogeneity of the money supply was being debated.
Consumption of fixed capital
2005 1612.0 billion
2006 1623.9 billion
2007 1720.5 billion
2008 2032.3 billion
So, they print more and more will never be enough since there is no market signal to refer to.
is this true or false to date: http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/s ... ords=romer
This is in direct context to multiplier.
Romers work for the administration's theory of money multiplier was based on Fishers observations and it is in the forums from the 1930's.
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2&p=3891&hilit=romer#p3891
How to generate severe stagflation in the years 2010 through 2019 right on que thanks Washington provided below.
The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a new Measure of Fiscal Shocks, by Christina D. and David H. Romer (March 2007). (Christina Romer now chairs the president's Council of Economic Advisors). This study found that the tax multiplier is 3, meaning that each dollar rise in taxes will reduce private spending by $3."
In the same vein: This is from Professor Fisher's book entitled 100% Money, revised edition
published by The Adelphi Company (1936)
There is a growing opinion among specialists in this field that the per capita money income is approximately equal to three times the per capita
money in circulation. Should this opinion be confirmed - that money and money income maintain an approximately constant ratio or even that this
would be true in the absence of great booms and depressions - we would reach the rather startling conclusion that to maintain the dollar as a
fixed fraction of per capita income would amount to the same thing as fixing the per capita supply of money and that the only statistics needed
by the Currency Commission would be those of population. We cannot, as yet, be sure that the two criteria - a fixed per capita quantity of money
and a dollar as a fixed fraction of the per capita income - are so nearly the same; but we can at least be sure that the per capita quantity plan
would not be a bad solution of the money problem. To note, this calculation exists.
We are right on target to what we already know. Also Fisher dies bankrupt and under his Family's dominion.
http://generationaldynamics.com/forum/v ... omer#p3608