Generational Dynamics Forum - New Site

https://www.thepublica.com/gay-spanish- ... own-feces/
Vote harder.

Buys call on dcf Companys as the FED annihilates zombie corps as the TV tells you Xiden tells you to just plug into His geniuses.
Why do the idiots allow the Hoeing DEI CEO 33 million to stay stupid until year end as they tell you that you are the obnoxious element.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ne ... S-2018.png

The Californication disease outbreak takes another 90000 workers out.
The political left does not care.

In the 1970s, the devastation occurred in three distinct waves. Each time the trend improved, elites declared victory and the Federal Reserve moved in with rate cuts, thereby causing yet another round. Absolutely no one in charge anticipated the next wave. It came anyway. tyler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrL_LzX5wv4

https://therightscoop.com/breaking-form ... 2020-riot/
Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund reveals to Tucker DC Police were STOPPED from assisting Secret Service as BLM rioters BURNED DOWN White House grounds with Trump inside:
"All charges were dropped... There were Secret Service agents bloodied and battered."

He also revealed the despite how many officers were injured during that riot, all the charges were dropped and no one was prosecuted.
Compare that to what happened on January 6th, when DC prosecutors put Trump supporters in jail for simply trespassing in the Capitol.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region of Lazio

Country of Italy

I, Prof Alfio D’Urso, Advocate/Lawyer, of Via Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, 95131 Italy, do hearby provide the following affidavit of facts as conveyed in several meetings with a high level army security services official:

Arturo D’Elia, former head of the IT Department of Leonardo SpA, has been charged by the public prosecutor of Naples for technology/data manipulation and implantation of viruses in the main computers of Leonardo SpA in December 2020. D’Elia has been deposed by the presiding judge in Naples and in sworn testimony states on 4 November 2020, under instruction and direction of US persons working from the US Embassy in Rome, undertook the operation to switch data from the US elections of 3 November 2020 from significant margin of victory from Donald Trump to Joe Biden in a number of states where Joe Biden was losing the vote totals. Defendant stated he was working in the Pescara facility of Leonardo SpA and utilized military grade cyber warfare encryption capabilities to transmit switched votes via military satellite of Fucino Tower to Frankfurt Germany. The defendant swears that the data in some cases may have been switched to represent more than total voters registered. The defendant has stated he is willing to testify to all individuals and entities involved in the switching of votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden when he shall be in total protection for himself and his family. Defendant states he has secured in an undisclosed location the backup of the original data and data switched upon instruction to provide evidence at court in this matter.

I hereby declare and swear the above stated facts have been stated in my presence.
DATED this 6th day of January 2021 at Rome, Italy.


viewtopic.php?p=56971#p56971
Sat May 19, 2018 6:24 am
Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression..........
You get the picture.....
The success of these techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a mere token opposition party.
His bio was removed from a university in Scotland and another institution in Italy where he previously taught.
They now show '404 Not Found' error pages.

https://attivissimo.blogspot.com/2021/0 ... e-who.html

Do you really think all the election officials are idiots, incapable of noticing a "statistically impossible" event?

Yes.

The evil bastards know exactly what they are doing.

https://www.dagnyintel.com/post/italy-p ... r-leonardo
These are photos at Rome's International Airport of the two alleged individuals involved in building the algorithms for the data manipulation of the 2020 US election. They were being surveilled by members of Italian intelligence after suspiciously entering into the country.

Pope on a popcicle stick hell has no pillows.

Kevin knows this reset was the contingency foreign and domestic warned of since day one with the Founders.
thread: red flair

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn_gY65Okk4
they do not care
period

or listen
period
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrg8t34yXRs The Epidemic That Dare Not Speak Its Name | Stephen J Shaw | EP 338

left loon of week
murder to protect the murder of children
hanoi girl logic

SVB is a holding company containing a broker-dealer and a bank. Only the banking component appears to have failed.
The stakeholders sold. One day you may figure that one out.
FDIC closes the bank, insures all deposits under $250,000 via the taxpayers, and attempts to find a buyer. If a buyer is found, that buyer takes on all the insured deposits. Often, but not always, the buyer will take on a fraction of the uninsured deposits as well. The FDIC attempts to minimize liquidation costs and allows firms to The entire process usually takes less than 72 hours. A bank is closed on a Friday and reopened on a Monday. In some cases, it is reopened on a Saturday.

Read the fine print since the demsheviks did this to you anyways.

"There's not a single, solitary example that" signing the bill to end Glass-Steagall "had anything to do with the financial crash." guess who

Congress passed Glass-Steagall in 1933, in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash that led to the Great Depression. The law kept commercial banks (where customers deposit money and take out loans) separate from investment firms (which hold securities and make investments) -- more colloquially, the law separated Main Street from Wall Street.

Guess who got it in the you know what.
They changed measures when we tossed two banker assholes in the clink with the lawsuit on covenant funds.
You think dodd frank July 21, 2010 update was protection for you? My you're a peach.

In 2018(Sec. 203) The bill amends the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to exempt from the "Volcker Rule" banks with: (1) total assets valued at less than $10 billion, and (2) trading assets and liabilities comprising not more than 5% of total assets. (The Volcker Rule prohibits banking agencies from engaging in proprietary trading or entering into certain relationships with hedge funds and private-equity funds.) Congress passed a new law that rolled back some of Dodd-Frank’s restrictions.

Another loot and scoot operation. Competiton is a sin remember. The dead flopping fish and shark will meet to be spun as cheif big player saved
us a hassle sorting it out. Mostly true at this point.

FDIC is almost certainly scrambling now to find one or two firms interested in buying out SVB. A firm like J.P. Morgan could build considerable goodwill with the Fed and Treasury by doing so, because such a move has the potential save regulators and finance ministry civil servants much headache.

March sweeps.
DCF matters.
Right.

The golden cross of dxy was noted before this meltup as btc, metals safety valve effect and alleged equity as consumer debt charge offs escalate
was seen in financial and risk off will return as warned on the odious legal debt definition in plain sight now. No one here needs the note on debt ceiling. Uniparty has assured an event dressed in white as the looting fools they are.
Zone conditions vary so they will lie cheat steal for "values" as vast majority already understand going into this vortec debt collapse.
We will hear they never seen this effect as before.

The sale-in-error is wiping that zone simply and completely out as they loot what also is failing and will not finacially survive this.
If they have not already ran for their very lives from these fools its already over for them and yes its dated here also.
Special interest rot will blanket and has any effective measures for the rest to survive. Like we said point blank the guys taxes went up 404 percent.
He finished and will be homeless sooner than later and will raise the rent.
No representation exists. Zone is jungle as your on your own as the calvary was not coming anyways.
Apology will be policy if anything is allowed for them to survive whats here. Fill out a survey. Cycles exist.
https://www.cookcountytreasurer.com/ift ... esold.aspx

The whales are not interested in this CO2 idiotic bullshit. They buy gold because they want to dismiss US and Euro as the idiots they became.
Say's law, is the law of markets, is the claim that production of a product creates demand for another product by providing something of value which can be exchanged for that other product. The only adjustment ignored in the new agreement was signed by Trump and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in 2018. Brand On just went to the Border and is allowed only to not fuck it up is the news.
USMCA simply updates the 25-year-old agreement it replaced.
It’s was expected to create 176,000 jobs after six years and increase US GDP by 0.35%.
The rest is partizan uniparty bullshit and legal lottery blame shifting as burn loot murder lie cheat steal in plain sight untouched as the dialectic
retards run unchecked.

Not yours to give.

https://gdxforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=48887#p48887

More later. Smart move H credit issues will be pig in the python Sun Sep 02, 2018 10:09 pm

Investors should remain cautious as the “pig exits the python” over the next several months. The consequence must be that markets adjust to a world with less monetary accommodation. In such an environment, accelerated returns will no longer be possible. TUESDAY, DEC 27, 2022 - 03:29 PM

Dunoyer incorporated Sismondi's theory into the Sayardian conception of political economy in which men have to adapt
their behaviour to the nature of things, or suffer the consequences.

richard5za wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 5:36 am Hi Cool,
on Tue Sep 07, 2021 you replied to Vince:

Vincey baby, notice how I've been shining with my uranium and lithium plays for the last two years? Add BTC to that and few can touch me.

It turns out that I do know what I'm doing.

I am looking at my portfolio and am looking for views on uranium and lithium. Are you still invested? What are forward prospects?

Great question. The uranium plays have been really good since 2018 (some 4x, mostly the average is 2.5x) but lithium I was in more speculative stuff so it didn't do as well, even though the spot price has been up. It's a weird world, that Li, because I think the green stuff is so unpredictable/politically motivated and manipulated.

Soon, I'm going to sell all paper related investments (except BTC/miners since they are so low and I'm bullish long term) and re-evaluate. I'll likely do this in the next 6 weeks to close out the year. I will then wait for the next leg down to get commodities/dividend producers for a long term (5-10 year) hold. Is that specific enough?

Higgenbotham wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:14 pm

Cool Breeze wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:48 am

richard5za wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 12:20 am I doubt that the smart money is buying at present and are probably out. In an unknown and rapidly rising asset such as BTC ...

Spotting the bottom of a down trend is very hard and its always better to wait for a confirmed up trend.

Do you conveniently leave out the fact that it has dipped over 5 times before like this AND gone back? That means what you are saying doesn't apply to this asset. It's pretty weird because it's disingenuous (I'm being nice). Why wouldn't smart money be buying? It just went down 60% in a version of its cycle, and the halving is upcoming again in 2024.

I agree that spotting the bottom is hard, but with the data and history we have, there is far more reason to believe that this goes back up to new ATH than anything you are saying (which you can't support).

It just stays down here forever, just because you say? At least give me a reason. I gave you several, including the history and chart, which you can't argue - thus you don't, you ignore it. I find that odd.

If someone were to start dollar cost averaging into Bitcoin now with a well thought out plan for the next year my guess is there's a 95% probability that investment will be up more than 20% at some point. Maybe 1 percent of funds per month or another 1% each 10 percent down: 20, 18, 16, etc. Bitcoin may not get to a new all time high but it's not going straight to zero either, in my opinion.

One of the reasons for this would be: If the Fed does not relent on the inflation fight, there are a lot of speculative issues in the Nasdaq that will never turn a profit and will be heading for bankruptcy. I said 1-2 years ago that there were 5,000 bubble items and Bitcoin was just another one of them. However, if the Fed does not relent, most of those bubble items will continue losing money or their profits will contract to the point that extrapolation will make it look like they will. At that point, the Fed should be close to reversing course. Even if Bitcoin is going down, once it starts to show relative strength against the Nasdaq, a bottom should be close. That is not happening yet, but Bitcoin is no longer losing relative to the Nasdaq either.

There are things that could change this and maybe my 95% (off the cuff) is too high, but there's still a lot of money out there, a real lot even if it's reduced some, and it has to go somewhere even if it's just a wicked bear market rally in Bitcoin.



Late in 2018 Bitcoin bottomed a few days before the Nasdaq and the relative strength against the Nasdaq shot up as the Nasdaq continued lower. A similar thing happened in March 2020.

Thank you for finally admitting that I was correct in my thesis all along. I'll excuse you for not having enough stones to say it directly.

richard5za wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 3:42 am This chart you posted Higg demonstrates my point. If you draw a line from the November 2021 high to the April 2022 high and extend that you get a trend point at current date of around $ 22500. BTC needs to break up through that to attract smart money buying. If it doesn't do that the high probabilty is that it will drop to the next support level down. $ 7500 is a very clear support level and there may be a support level above. Some traders reckon $ 13000.

The chart I posted is a chart of Bitcoin divided by the Nasdaq. As long as the Nasdaq goes up or down enough all of the levels you are discussing above on the chart I posted could get hit with Bitcoin going no lower than it is now.

The chart shows what has happened the last 2 times Bitcoin has made an important low (in 2018 and 2020). It's reasonable to think that if a similar thing were to happen again, where Bitcoin makes a low and sits there while the Nasdaq flushes further, causing a spike up in the ratio of Bitcoin to the Nasdaq, that has a high probability of being another important low.

Higgenbotham wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:14 pm

Cool Breeze wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:48 am

richard5za wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 12:20 am I doubt that the smart money is buying at present and are probably out. In an unknown and rapidly rising asset such as BTC ...
Spotting the bottom of a down trend is very hard and its always better to wait for a confirmed up trend.

It just stays down here forever, just because you say? At least give me a reason. I gave you several, including the history and chart, which you can't argue - thus you don't, you ignore it. I find that odd.

There are things that could change this and maybe my 95% (off the cuff) is too high, but there's still a lot of money out there, a real lot even if it's reduced some, and it has to go somewhere even if it's just a wicked bear market rally in Bitcoin.



Late in 2018 Bitcoin bottomed a few days before the Nasdaq and the relative strength against the Nasdaq shot up as the Nasdaq continued lower. A similar thing happened in March 2020.

This chart you posted Higg demonstrates my point. If you draw a line from the November 2021 high to the April 2022 high anf extend that you get a trend point at current date of around $ 22500. BTC needs to break up through that to attract smart money buying. If it doesn't do that the high probabilty is that it will drop to the next support level down. $ 7500 is a very clear support level and there may be a support level above. Some traders reckon $ 13000.

Its not going to zero any time soon because its so useful to the bad guys and regulating it will take time. The G20 amongst others is determined to regulate crypto and I have no doubt that this will happen in the long or medium term

BTC is a fascinating subject and I have no doubt that there will be much correspondence on this blog as the drama unfolds

Cool Breeze wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:48 am

richard5za wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 12:20 am I doubt that the smart money is buying at present and are probably out. In an unknown and rapidly rising asset such as BTC ...

Spotting the bottom of a down trend is very hard and its always better to wait for a confirmed up trend.

Do you conveniently leave out the fact that it has dipped over 5 times before like this AND gone back? That means what you are saying doesn't apply to this asset. It's pretty weird because it's disingenuous (I'm being nice). Why wouldn't smart money be buying? It just went down 60% in a version of its cycle, and the halving is upcoming again in 2024.

I agree that spotting the bottom is hard, but with the data and history we have, there is far more reason to believe that this goes back up to new ATH than anything you are saying (which you can't support).

It just stays down here forever, just because you say? At least give me a reason. I gave you several, including the history and chart, which you can't argue - thus you don't, you ignore it. I find that odd.

If someone were to start dollar cost averaging into Bitcoin now with a well thought out plan for the next year my guess is there's a 95% probability that investment will be up more than 20% at some point. Maybe 1 percent of funds per month or another 1% each 10 percent down: 20, 18, 16, etc. Bitcoin may not get to a new all time high but it's not going straight to zero either, in my opinion.

One of the reasons for this would be: If the Fed does not relent on the inflation fight, there are a lot of speculative issues in the Nasdaq that will never turn a profit and will be heading for bankruptcy. I said 1-2 years ago that there were 5,000 bubble items and Bitcoin was just another one of them. However, if the Fed does not relent, most of those bubble items will continue losing money or their profits will contract to the point that extrapolation will make it look like they will. At that point, the Fed should be close to reversing course. Even if Bitcoin is going down, once it starts to show relative strength against the Nasdaq, a bottom should be close. That is not happening yet, but Bitcoin is no longer losing relative to the Nasdaq either.

There are things that could change this and maybe my 95% (off the cuff) is too high, but there's still a lot of money out there, a real lot even if it's reduced some, and it has to go somewhere even if it's just a wicked bear market rally in Bitcoin.



Late in 2018 Bitcoin bottomed a few days before the Nasdaq and the relative strength against the Nasdaq shot up as the Nasdaq continued lower. A similar thing happened in March 2020.