by FishbellykanakaDude » Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:44 am
guest wrote:FishbellykanakaDude wrote:Guest wrote:
'I think'. You think? You don't know anything about Japanese society. You are just making things up. Why do you have to comment on everything? You know little about anything. It's always the dumbest people who shout the loudest.
Then you're free to enlighten me as to my errors! I love receiving enlightenment.
I'm conjecturing on what I see, and if my conjecture is wrong, let me know where I'm wrong.
Y U no help?
I'll comment on what I wish to comment on, as that is why this forum is here. Why are you commenting on my commentation, if commenting on commentation is wrong?
Y U no wrong 2?
(I do realize that "commentation" is an "obsolete" word, but I like it, so I'll use it.)
Everyone's opinions (their "knowing about stuff) are valuable, so why should I be selfish and not contribute mine?
Y U wan me B greedy?
I'm not shouting. I'm typing. And not in ALL CAPS, either. You're perfectly free to, though apparently incapable of, not reading and not responding to things that other's say.
Y U so mean...!?
<chuckle!>
You don't have the balls to talk to an Asian like this to their face.
Of course not! You're quite right.
That would be ludicrously rude, in that context.
There are many contexts that people operate within. This forum is one of them. "Face to face" is another one. There are reasons that more than one context exists. Different contexts are needed for different objectives of "conversation".
Your rather poor conversational skills (in the "forum" context) whereby you don't deal with working on clarifying matters under discussion, but rather focus on imagined personal affronts, are most likely due to the fact that you are simply inexperienced in working within multiple contexts, and assume that "conversational rules" are a universal rule set, which they aren't.
Your "affront taking" is also an EXCELLENT tactic to avoid having to engage in constructive conversation by simply being "OUTRAGED",.. which the snowybunny crowd, such as yourself (perhaps?), loves to use, as "work" in this arena is a bit difficult for them,.. or at least, difficult for you (regardless of your affiliation with said snowybunny contingent).
Versatility is a virtue. Loosen up, my fluffy white alpine leporidae! Surf the present context, whatever it may be,.. you'll do fine,.. people are quite forgiving.
[quote="guest"][quote="FishbellykanakaDude"][quote="Guest"]
'I think'. You think? You don't know anything about Japanese society. You are just making things up. Why do you have to comment on everything? You know little about anything. It's always the dumbest people who shout the loudest.[/quote]
Then you're free to enlighten me as to my errors! I love receiving enlightenment. :)
I'm conjecturing on what I see, and if my conjecture is wrong, let me know where I'm wrong.
Y U no help?
I'll comment on what I wish to comment on, as that is why this forum is here. Why are you commenting on my commentation, if commenting on commentation is wrong?
Y U no wrong 2?
(I do realize that "commentation" is an "obsolete" word, but I like it, so I'll use it.)
Everyone's opinions (their "knowing about stuff) are valuable, so why should I be selfish and not contribute mine?
Y U wan me B greedy?
I'm not shouting. I'm typing. And not in ALL CAPS, either. You're perfectly free to, though apparently incapable of, not reading and not responding to things that other's say.
Y U so mean...!?
<chuckle!>[/quote]
You don't have the balls to talk to an Asian like this to their face.[/quote]
Of course not! You're quite right. :) That would be ludicrously rude, in that context.
There are many contexts that people operate within. This forum is one of them. "Face to face" is another one. There are reasons that more than one context exists. Different contexts are needed for different objectives of "conversation".
Your rather poor conversational skills (in the "forum" context) whereby you don't deal with working on clarifying matters under discussion, but rather focus on imagined personal affronts, are most likely due to the fact that you are simply inexperienced in working within multiple contexts, and assume that "conversational rules" are a universal rule set, which they aren't.
Your "affront taking" is also an EXCELLENT tactic to avoid having to engage in constructive conversation by simply being "OUTRAGED",.. which the snowybunny crowd, such as yourself (perhaps?), loves to use, as "work" in this arena is a bit difficult for them,.. or at least, difficult for you (regardless of your affiliation with said snowybunny contingent).
Versatility is a virtue. Loosen up, my fluffy white alpine leporidae! Surf the present context, whatever it may be,.. you'll do fine,.. people are quite forgiving. :)