by Higgenbotham » Sat Sep 05, 2026 1:35 am
aedens wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2026 10:57 pm
Still they cannot comprehend how they do whatever it takes to control as they commit suicide.
The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis: From Natural Selection to Symbolic Selection: Scale, Abstraction, and the Adaptive Pressures of Institutional Gameboards
by Greg Michael Elliott (Author) Format: Paperback
The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis examines how the logic of natural selection changes when human beings begin living inside large-scale symbolic systems.
For most of evolutionary history, human adaptation occurred within environments where consequence was immediate, social life was embodied, and survival depended heavily on reciprocity, trust, cooperation, reputation, and sensitivity to others. But modern societies increasingly operate through abstract systems: corporations, markets, bureaucracies, legal instruments, financial architectures, digital platforms, political institutions, and algorithmic forms of governance. These systems do not merely organize human behavior. They create new selection environments.
This book argues that as societies scale, become anonymous, and operate through symbolic gameboards, the traits most rewarded within them can shift. Cognitive profiles associated with strategic manipulation, emotional detachment, dominance orientation, status sensitivity, risk tolerance, impression management, and low affective inhibition may become increasingly adaptive in environments where success depends less on reciprocal belonging and more on navigating abstraction, exploiting incentives, modeling others, and rewriting rules.
The central claim is not that psychopathy causes civilization, nor that all powerful individuals are psychopaths. Rather, The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis proposes that complex symbolic systems can selectively advantage psychopathic and Dark Triad traits under specific institutional conditions.
https://www.amazon.com/Psychopathic-Sel ... B0H2FR3Q1W
If domination isn't an aberration but a predictable output of the game board we've built, what does that mean for how we try to fix it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVlfwKUssPg
I don't think there's anything here that we haven't already discussed, but this did recently come out and I thought you might be interested. I don't understand why there's always this seemingly obligatory gibberish about "how do we fix it?" The collapse into the new dark age is what fixes it, as it always has, because it's the only way to fix it.
As John said multiple times, there is no solution. Though I should be clear that John was only referring to the problems that beget generational crises.
[quote=aedens post_id=95334 time=1788577077 user_id=182]
Still they cannot comprehend how they do whatever it takes to control as they commit suicide.[/quote]
[quote]The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis: From Natural Selection to Symbolic Selection: Scale, Abstraction, and the Adaptive Pressures of Institutional Gameboards
by Greg Michael Elliott (Author) Format: Paperback
The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis examines how the logic of natural selection changes when human beings begin living inside large-scale symbolic systems.
For most of evolutionary history, human adaptation occurred within environments where consequence was immediate, social life was embodied, and survival depended heavily on reciprocity, trust, cooperation, reputation, and sensitivity to others. But modern societies increasingly operate through abstract systems: corporations, markets, bureaucracies, legal instruments, financial architectures, digital platforms, political institutions, and algorithmic forms of governance. These systems do not merely organize human behavior. They create new selection environments.
This book argues that as societies scale, become anonymous, and operate through symbolic gameboards, the traits most rewarded within them can shift. Cognitive profiles associated with strategic manipulation, emotional detachment, dominance orientation, status sensitivity, risk tolerance, impression management, and low affective inhibition may become increasingly adaptive in environments where success depends less on reciprocal belonging and more on navigating abstraction, exploiting incentives, modeling others, and rewriting rules.
The central claim is not that psychopathy causes civilization, nor that all powerful individuals are psychopaths. Rather, The Psychopathic Selection Hypothesis proposes that complex symbolic systems can selectively advantage psychopathic and Dark Triad traits under specific institutional conditions.[/quote]
https://www.amazon.com/Psychopathic-Selection-Hypothesis-Abstraction-Institutional/dp/B0H2FR3Q1W
[quote]If domination isn't an aberration but a predictable output of the game board we've built, what does that mean for how we try to fix it? [/quote]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVlfwKUssPg
I don't think there's anything here that we haven't already discussed, but this did recently come out and I thought you might be interested. I don't understand why there's always this seemingly obligatory gibberish about "how do we fix it?" The collapse into the new dark age is what fixes it, as it always has, because it's the only way to fix it.
As John said multiple times, there is no solution. Though I should be clear that John was only referring to the problems that beget generational crises.